caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

BTW, I see some post have been deleted. Perhaps BBW was correct…. I think you forgot to delete the post that prompted my response post. Whatever…

---

LOL, LOL. Hey, my response to your name-calling post was deleted as well. Which of these commie mods can we call out and sue for taking away our ability to say whatever, whenever, to whomever? Scoundrels!

I'd save my self-righteous, "woe-as-me being put upon by The Man" whining for when it really mattered? The removal of those two posts seems ok in this case, as neither contributed to the discussion, which was in great part, why do people pick and choose the news sources that they trust.

---

Still there...

Lol, but he's one of those "laughably independent" sources that closely aligns with Cary's views on things, which then makes him "a very smart source". I hate the media as much as anyone, but these "independent" sources are usually preferred my many because of confirmation bias.

He was so non-guilty that he sought and received a presidential pardon. Who knows though, maybe one day he'll find the key to turning over the AZ election

Like Ive said about you Chem, ad hominem attacks provides nothing to the conversation. Perhaps you and I can discuss real issues when you decide to START discussing real issues.

Whatever...

---

None of what I said is an attack on you. An attack on your sources that you are so loyal too...yes, and you are clearly very sensitive about that as your responses to all who questioned your sources showed.

We're all guilty of finding sources that we agree with, to a degree. Its sad that that is where we have landed with news sources, but then, they are just filling a business demand as well, just like other businesses.

As I recall, the only personal attack on a poster was yours. Which got deleted.

hokiewolf said:

---

I'm generally of the mind that we should end the war on drugs but we shouldn't make it easier to do heroin either

NEW YORK (AP) — Justice Department signals it might be willing to allow safe injection sites for people to use heroin and other drugs.

— Zeke Miller (@ZekeJMiller) February 7, 2022

---

"Safe injection sites". Holy mackeral.

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

BTW, I see some post have been deleted. Perhaps BBW was correct…. I think you forgot to delete the post that prompted my response post. Whatever…

---

LOL, LOL. Hey, my response to your name-calling post was deleted as well. Which of these commie mods can we call out and sue for taking away our ability to say whatever, whenever, to whomever? Scoundrels!

I'd save my self-righteous, "woe-as-me being put upon by The Man" whining for when it really mattered? The removal of those two posts seems ok in this case, as neither contributed to the discussion, which was in great part, why do people pick and choose the news sources that they trust.

---

Still there...

Lol, but he's one of those "laughably independent" sources that closely aligns with Cary's views on things, which then makes him "a very smart source". I hate the media as much as anyone, but these "independent" sources are usually preferred my many because of confirmation bias.

He was so non-guilty that he sought and received a presidential pardon. Who knows though, maybe one day he'll find the key to turning over the AZ election

Like Ive said about you Chem, ad hominem attacks provides nothing to the conversation. Perhaps you and I can discuss real issues when you decide to START discussing real issues.

Whatever...

---

None of what I said is an attack on you. An attack on your sources that you are so loyal too...yes, and you are clearly very sensitive about that as your responses to all who questioned your sources showed.

We're all guilty of finding sources that we agree with, to a degree. Its sad that that is where we have landed with news sources, but then, they are just filling a business demand as well, just like other businesses.

As I recall, the only personal attack on a poster was yours. Which got deleted.

---

And… you still haven't opined on the context of the two videos; however, you made time to comment on the sources and not the content.

Chem, you do you…

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

BTW, I see some post have been deleted. Perhaps BBW was correct…. I think you forgot to delete the post that prompted my response post. Whatever…

---

LOL, LOL. Hey, my response to your name-calling post was deleted as well. Which of these commie mods can we call out and sue for taking away our ability to say whatever, whenever, to whomever? Scoundrels!

I'd save my self-righteous, "woe-as-me being put upon by The Man" whining for when it really mattered? The removal of those two posts seems ok in this case, as neither contributed to the discussion, which was in great part, why do people pick and choose the news sources that they trust.

---

Still there...

Lol, but he's one of those "laughably independent" sources that closely aligns with Cary's views on things, which then makes him "a very smart source". I hate the media as much as anyone, but these "independent" sources are usually preferred my many because of confirmation bias.

He was so non-guilty that he sought and received a presidential pardon. Who knows though, maybe one day he'll find the key to turning over the AZ election

Like Ive said about you Chem, ad hominem attacks provides nothing to the conversation. Perhaps you and I can discuss real issues when you decide to START discussing real issues.

Whatever...

---

None of what I said is an attack on you. An attack on your sources that you are so loyal too...yes, and you are clearly very sensitive about that as your responses to all who questioned your sources showed.

We're all guilty of finding sources that we agree with, to a degree. Its sad that that is where we have landed with news sources, but then, they are just filling a business demand as well, just like other businesses.

As I recall, the only personal attack on a poster was yours. Which got deleted.

---

And… you still haven't opined on the context of the two videos; however, you made time to comment on the sources and not the content.

Chem, you do you…

---

I saw one video. Compelling, concerning topic....and instead of asking the expert on what the impact of all that money infusion, we got the standard "host proving he's also an expert". Hey, it was a world better than the last video i watched after you swore it would educate everyone. But that doesn't take away from my opinion that your "independent" sources are hardly independent....though I'm sure they are well-connected enough that they will get good SMEs from time to time

I didn't see a 2nd video

Does evidence support supervised injection sites?

Study on the effects of the Vancouver safe injection sites.

Doesn't look like an abject failure, at least not through this study's lens.

I've never looked into these but will try to read up on them a little.

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

BTW, I see some post have been deleted. Perhaps BBW was correct…. I think you forgot to delete the post that prompted my response post. Whatever…

---

LOL, LOL. Hey, my response to your name-calling post was deleted as well. Which of these commie mods can we call out and sue for taking away our ability to say whatever, whenever, to whomever? Scoundrels!

I'd save my self-righteous, "woe-as-me being put upon by The Man" whining for when it really mattered? The removal of those two posts seems ok in this case, as neither contributed to the discussion, which was in great part, why do people pick and choose the news sources that they trust.

---

Still there...

Lol, but he's one of those "laughably independent" sources that closely aligns with Cary's views on things, which then makes him "a very smart source". I hate the media as much as anyone, but these "independent" sources are usually preferred my many because of confirmation bias.

He was so non-guilty that he sought and received a presidential pardon. Who knows though, maybe one day he'll find the key to turning over the AZ election

Like Ive said about you Chem, ad hominem attacks provides nothing to the conversation. Perhaps you and I can discuss real issues when you decide to START discussing real issues.

Whatever...

---

None of what I said is an attack on you. An attack on your sources that you are so loyal too...yes, and you are clearly very sensitive about that as your responses to all who questioned your sources showed.

We're all guilty of finding sources that we agree with, to a degree. Its sad that that is where we have landed with news sources, but then, they are just filling a business demand as well, just like other businesses.

As I recall, the only personal attack on a poster was yours. Which got deleted.

---

And… you still haven't opined on the context of the two videos; however, you made time to comment on the sources and not the content.

Chem, you do you…

---

I saw one video. Compelling, concerning topic....and instead of asking the expert on what the impact of all that money infusion, we got the standard "host proving he's also an expert". Hey, it was a world better than the last video i watched after you swore it would educate everyone. But that doesn't take away from my opinion that your "independent" sources are hardly independent....though I'm sure they are well-connected enough that they will get good SMEs from time to time

I didn't see a 2nd video

---

Chem, Bannon has been saying the exact same thing forever. He brought on another person, who actually wrote a book on the subject, to give the audience a place to read more on the subject.

Unfortunately, it appears that you don't follow Bannon's show; therefore, I question your understanding and comments about how he conducts his show. That's ok…

I'm happy you found the topic concerning. Now, go back and look at the video I posted, by Russel Brand, and see a supporting commentary on the easy money issue.

We have our posters: GP, werewolf, and it used to be BBW, that are talking about this stuff regarding the "World Economic Forum". These videos are just further dialogue into the whole subject of the real two societies we have.

Based on what I know about you (only from this forum) this subject sounds like it will be enough, for you, to research further…

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

BTW, I see some post have been deleted. Perhaps BBW was correct…. I think you forgot to delete the post that prompted my response post. Whatever…

---

LOL, LOL. Hey, my response to your name-calling post was deleted as well. Which of these commie mods can we call out and sue for taking away our ability to say whatever, whenever, to whomever? Scoundrels!

I'd save my self-righteous, "woe-as-me being put upon by The Man" whining for when it really mattered? The removal of those two posts seems ok in this case, as neither contributed to the discussion, which was in great part, why do people pick and choose the news sources that they trust.

---

Still there...

Lol, but he's one of those "laughably independent" sources that closely aligns with Cary's views on things, which then makes him "a very smart source". I hate the media as much as anyone, but these "independent" sources are usually preferred my many because of confirmation bias.

He was so non-guilty that he sought and received a presidential pardon. Who knows though, maybe one day he'll find the key to turning over the AZ election

Like Ive said about you Chem, ad hominem attacks provides nothing to the conversation. Perhaps you and I can discuss real issues when you decide to START discussing real issues.

Whatever...

---

None of what I said is an attack on you. An attack on your sources that you are so loyal too...yes, and you are clearly very sensitive about that as your responses to all who questioned your sources showed.

We're all guilty of finding sources that we agree with, to a degree. Its sad that that is where we have landed with news sources, but then, they are just filling a business demand as well, just like other businesses.

As I recall, the only personal attack on a poster was yours. Which got deleted.

---

And… you still haven't opined on the context of the two videos; however, you made time to comment on the sources and not the content.

Chem, you do you…

---

I saw one video. Compelling, concerning topic....and instead of asking the expert on what the impact of all that money infusion, we got the standard "host proving he's also an expert". Hey, it was a world better than the last video i watched after you swore it would educate everyone. But that doesn't take away from my opinion that your "independent" sources are hardly independent....though I'm sure they are well-connected enough that they will get good SMEs from time to time

I didn't see a 2nd video

---

Chem, Bannon has been saying the exact same thing forever. He brought on another person, who actually wrote a book on the subject, to give the audience a place to read more on the subject.

Unfortunately, it appears that you don't follow Bannon's show; therefore, I question your understanding and comments about how he conducts his show. That's ok…

I'm happy you found the topic concerning. Now, go back and look at the video I posted, by Russel Brand, and see a supporting commentary on the easy money issue.

We have our posters: GP, werewolf, and it used to be BBW, that are talking about this stuff regarding the "World Economic Forum". These videos are just further dialogue into the whole subject of the real two societies we have.

Based on what I know about you (only from this forum) this subject sounds like it will be enough, for you, to research further…

---

I'm sorry, but if you're trying to justify your choice of news sources by trotting out guys who think Covid is fake, think the world is flat, thinks everyone but a select few right-wing believers is a commie, and has just demonstrated general tin-foil posting....I'm not sure thats really going to work.

It's like you've thrown up the Mount Rushmore of crazy posting on this site to the point I wonder if its a parody post?

---

The best thing for this forum would be if ever you two can learn to just ignore each other and move on to the next post... neither one of you is going to "win over" the other.

---

LOL, I know....and I've done such a good job of just staying out of teh fray for the past few months on this and the covid topics because clearly everyone has well entrenched positions that aren't going to change and must be tired of even discussing anymore.... Got way too much going on at work to worry about those battles...so I'll return to that condition, and try to keep my posts to the fun things like how our FB team is going to win the ACC next season

Hahaha

Kari Lake, former broadcast news anchor - a Patriot

A dribble of truth by Az Republican candidate for Governor.......just a dribble, just a drip... dropped inside the matrix.

Kari Lake is a fabulous warrior for truth and justice. Potential POTUS candidate in my estimation (if we still have a Constitution in 5-10 years).

Packchem91 said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

BTW, I see some post have been deleted. Perhaps BBW was correct…. I think you forgot to delete the post that prompted my response post. Whatever…

---

LOL, LOL. Hey, my response to your name-calling post was deleted as well. Which of these commie mods can we call out and sue for taking away our ability to say whatever, whenever, to whomever? Scoundrels!

I'd save my self-righteous, "woe-as-me being put upon by The Man" whining for when it really mattered? The removal of those two posts seems ok in this case, as neither contributed to the discussion, which was in great part, why do people pick and choose the news sources that they trust.

---

Still there...

Lol, but he's one of those "laughably independent" sources that closely aligns with Cary's views on things, which then makes him "a very smart source". I hate the media as much as anyone, but these "independent" sources are usually preferred my many because of confirmation bias.

He was so non-guilty that he sought and received a presidential pardon. Who knows though, maybe one day he'll find the key to turning over the AZ election

Like Ive said about you Chem, ad hominem attacks provides nothing to the conversation. Perhaps you and I can discuss real issues when you decide to START discussing real issues.

Whatever...

---

None of what I said is an attack on you. An attack on your sources that you are so loyal too...yes, and you are clearly very sensitive about that as your responses to all who questioned your sources showed.

We're all guilty of finding sources that we agree with, to a degree. Its sad that that is where we have landed with news sources, but then, they are just filling a business demand as well, just like other businesses.

As I recall, the only personal attack on a poster was yours. Which got deleted.

---

And… you still haven't opined on the context of the two videos; however, you made time to comment on the sources and not the content.

Chem, you do you…

---

I saw one video. Compelling, concerning topic....and instead of asking the expert on what the impact of all that money infusion, we got the standard "host proving he's also an expert". Hey, it was a world better than the last video i watched after you swore it would educate everyone. But that doesn't take away from my opinion that your "independent" sources are hardly independent....though I'm sure they are well-connected enough that they will get good SMEs from time to time

I didn't see a 2nd video

---

Chem, Bannon has been saying the exact same thing forever. He brought on another person, who actually wrote a book on the subject, to give the audience a place to read more on the subject.

Unfortunately, it appears that you don't follow Bannon's show; therefore, I question your understanding and comments about how he conducts his show. That's ok…

I'm happy you found the topic concerning. Now, go back and look at the video I posted, by Russel Brand, and see a supporting commentary on the easy money issue.

We have our posters: GP, werewolf, and it used to be BBW, that are talking about this stuff regarding the "World Economic Forum". These videos are just further dialogue into the whole subject of the real two societies we have.

Based on what I know about you (only from this forum) this subject sounds like it will be enough, for you, to research further…

---

I'm sorry, but if you're trying to justify your choice of news sources by trotting out guys who think Covid is fake, think the world is flat, thinks everyone but a select few right-wing believers is a commie, and has just demonstrated general tin-foil posting....I'm not sure thats really going to work.

It's like you've thrown up the Mount Rushmore of crazy posting on this site to the point I wonder if its a parody post?

---

The best thing for this forum would be if ever you two can learn to just ignore each other and move on to the next post... neither one of you is going to "win over" the other.

---

LOL, I know....and I've done such a good job of just staying out of teh fray for the past few months on this and the covid topics because clearly everyone has well entrenched positions that aren't going to change and must be tired of even discussing anymore.... Got way too much going on at work to worry about those battles...so I'll return to that condition, and try to keep my posts to the fun things like how our FB team is going to win the ACC next season

---

Laughable!!

Chem, I had you on ignore; however, I took you, as well as others, off. Please do me a favor: you're going back on ignore, so, please do the same with me.

TheStorm said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

BTW, I see some post have been deleted. Perhaps BBW was correct…. I think you forgot to delete the post that prompted my response post. Whatever…

---

LOL, LOL. Hey, my response to your name-calling post was deleted as well. Which of these commie mods can we call out and sue for taking away our ability to say whatever, whenever, to whomever? Scoundrels!

I'd save my self-righteous, "woe-as-me being put upon by The Man" whining for when it really mattered? The removal of those two posts seems ok in this case, as neither contributed to the discussion, which was in great part, why do people pick and choose the news sources that they trust.

---

Still there...

Lol, but he's one of those "laughably independent" sources that closely aligns with Cary's views on things, which then makes him "a very smart source". I hate the media as much as anyone, but these "independent" sources are usually preferred my many because of confirmation bias.

He was so non-guilty that he sought and received a presidential pardon. Who knows though, maybe one day he'll find the key to turning over the AZ election

Like Ive said about you Chem, ad hominem attacks provides nothing to the conversation. Perhaps you and I can discuss real issues when you decide to START discussing real issues.

Whatever...

---

None of what I said is an attack on you. An attack on your sources that you are so loyal too...yes, and you are clearly very sensitive about that as your responses to all who questioned your sources showed.

We're all guilty of finding sources that we agree with, to a degree. Its sad that that is where we have landed with news sources, but then, they are just filling a business demand as well, just like other businesses.

As I recall, the only personal attack on a poster was yours. Which got deleted.

---

And… you still haven't opined on the context of the two videos; however, you made time to comment on the sources and not the content.

Chem, you do you…

---

I saw one video. Compelling, concerning topic....and instead of asking the expert on what the impact of all that money infusion, we got the standard "host proving he's also an expert". Hey, it was a world better than the last video i watched after you swore it would educate everyone. But that doesn't take away from my opinion that your "independent" sources are hardly independent....though I'm sure they are well-connected enough that they will get good SMEs from time to time

I didn't see a 2nd video

---

Chem, Bannon has been saying the exact same thing forever. He brought on another person, who actually wrote a book on the subject, to give the audience a place to read more on the subject.

Unfortunately, it appears that you don't follow Bannon's show; therefore, I question your understanding and comments about how he conducts his show. That's ok…

I'm happy you found the topic concerning. Now, go back and look at the video I posted, by Russel Brand, and see a supporting commentary on the easy money issue.

We have our posters: GP, werewolf, and it used to be BBW, that are talking about this stuff regarding the "World Economic Forum". These videos are just further dialogue into the whole subject of the real two societies we have.

Based on what I know about you (only from this forum) this subject sounds like it will be enough, for you, to research further…

---

I'm sorry, but if you're trying to justify your choice of news sources by trotting out guys who think Covid is fake, think the world is flat, thinks everyone but a select few right-wing believers is a commie, and has just demonstrated general tin-foil posting....I'm not sure thats really going to work.

It's like you've thrown up the Mount Rushmore of crazy posting on this site to the point I wonder if its a parody post?

---

The best thing for this forum would be if ever you two can learn to just ignore each other and move on to the next post... neither one of you is going to "win over" the other.

---

Storm, he's on ignore now. It is funny, as much as I don't agree with Civ, he and I can have reasonable conversation. I say that because I could say Civ is some tin-foil poster, but I'd rather engage differently. I guess some people can't find common ground with anyone, so they just use ad hominem attacks.

Whatever…

Civilized said:

---

Hahaha

---

Thats the NC State BB team about mid-way thru every game.....get way behind, go outside to play with the dog. Check twitter...oh heck, lets go back in as we make this close. Then, the final 5 minutes have to be played

Forgive me if this was discussed already..

As part of Biden's new racial "Equity" plan, he wants $30 million to fund groups that provide crack pipes to "underprivileged" groups.

Biden and son Hunter should definitely know something about crack.

Biden administration to fund programs to hand out crack pipes https://t.co/ddUZYEuYlj

— FOX 5 DC (@fox5dc) February 8, 2022

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Forgive me if this was discussed already..

As part of Biden's new racial "Equity" plan, he wants $30 million to fund groups that provide crack pipes to "underprivileged" groups.

Biden and son Hunter should definitely know something about crack.

Biden administration to fund programs to hand out crack pipes https://t.co/ddUZYEuYlj

— FOX 5 DC (@fox5dc) February 8, 2022

---

What? They don't want them to have to waste that $0.99 on those beautiful little fabric roses they sell at the counter of every convenience store everywhere?

Oldsouljer said:

---

Their priorities relative to main street priorities are truly stunning. The price of gas just jumped at least 5% today. I mentioned it to the cashier tonight after I dumped $50 in the tank and she then told me they're hiking again tomorrow. The Bidenites must be sampling their own product before distributing it.

---

In the Lamestream "news" a few weeks ago I heard them say that gas will be a national average of $4.00/gallon by the summer.

Also keep hearing that food prices will continue to dramatically increase this year.

This is unprecedented levels of inflation. Who could have imagined that adding $8 trillion to the national debt in about two years could cause this????

Steve Videtich said:

---

https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/592877-twin-metals-mine-cancellation-is-a-gut-punch-to-us-steelworkers

Biden going even further to kill anything and everything energy related and continue to help China in every way he can.

---

Strange, I thought batteries where less harmful than oil and gas.

hokiewolf said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

https://thehill.com/opinion/energy-environment/592877-twin-metals-mine-cancellation-is-a-gut-punch-to-us-steelworkers

Biden going even further to kill anything and everything energy related and continue to help China in every way he can.

---

Strange, I thought batteries where less harmful than oil and gas.

---

Being that batteries come from China, I would say that's more harmful…

Going to be a "near death" experience for this country, hang on tight.

"We are currently in a war. It may not seem like it but yes, we ARE in a war.


"There are different types of war. A kinetic war uses bombs. Trump chose not to go that route because they are very messy, and extremely traumatizing. Trump and Q chose an information/economic war, (General Flynn has talked about a information war many times.) Unfortunately, this approach takes a little longer, but the good part is, cities are not being blown to smithereens, and casualties are kept at a minimum.
"There are always hardships and loss in war, and collateral damage is to be expected. You may notice our country is facing some economic hardships. Businesses are going bankrupt, inflation is on the rise, there are shortages in workforce, and there is talk of a 'dark winter.' This is a wound intentionally inflicted on ourselves.
"Right now there are 75 container ships from China sitting outside the ports. They cannot be unloaded due to 'labor shortages.' They are blaming the Covid-19 virus, the unemployment checks, saying that our workforce would rather stay home and collect decent wages as opposed to working for it.

"Also, they are mandating that truck drivers take the vaccine.
"All these factors put a kink in the supply chain. You may notice supermarket shelves are looking sparse, food prices are rising.

"This was all planned. Why, you may ask? If Chinese goods are not flowing, what happens? China goes bankrupt. China is an export country. They only get paid when they offload their exported goods here. Guess what? They are not getting paid!

"At the same time they have the Evergrande situation. Evergrande will lead to a dozen more institutions going bankrupt within China. This will destroy their economy and meanwhile they have no income coming in. Double whammy!The economic fallout will spread to the USA so prepare, stock up on essential items.
"There may be as many as a half dozen countries that committed acts of war against the United States (Five Eyes) but the main aggressor is China. They unleashed a bioweapon on us and took part in the election steal. They have bought all of our politicians, judges and AG's. For this reason China became the main target. This is why we see 4 of our battle groups floating in the seas surrounding China.

"Q spelled out the plan in the most simple term in Q post 4524. '[D] + China = 11.3'…Democrats + China = 11.3. You have to fill in what this simple equation means. 11.3 is not a date, its a chapter out of the Department of Defense Law of War Manual. If you have not read it, I suggest you do, here is the link….Chapter 11.3 starts on page 750: '11.3 END OF OCCUPATION AND DURATION OF GC OBLIGATIONS'."

"The fact that Democrats joined forces with a foreign country (China) to steal our election from us and that now [the] Biden Administration has assumed power, makes them [China] a belligerent occupier. It's like the USA setting down in Iraq 20 years ago; we became an occupier of Iraq. China (with cooperation from the 'democraps') has become an occupier of the USA. This is a act of war.

"There are international codes for war. These are expected to be followed by all nations. If these codes are not followed you can expect United Nations/NATO involvement especially if they see human rights abuses. These codes are called the Geneva Convention Articles (GC).…

"If you look at 11.3 in the DOD manual you see they talk about GC. Trump does everything by the book. You may not like it but in order for us to get to the finish line we must play by the rules set down for us. If we break GC code we risk the globalists getting involved using NATO. Remember we are also at war with the globalists and they would not hesitate to get involved if given a reason.

"The DOD Law of War Manual (11.3) explains that GC code applies to both the belligerent occupier and the occupied territory (USA). After one year the GC obligation expires for the occupied territory.

"Remember China and Biden took control on 1/20/2021. One year will be 1/20/2022. After that date our military has the legal authority to take our country back. This is when 11.3 goes into effect."

I swear that as much as I try not to sometimes, I can only scroll right on to the next post...

Storm, if you are talking about werewolf's post, well, there was a lot in it…

Some of it, I believe; however, some of it, well… it needs more validation for me to support. It sounds feasible, but, it also sounds far fetched.

I don't know, it's a lot to consume. What I do believe is: we need to work hard to get off the CCP tit!

Steve Videtich said:

---

Inflation hits 7.5%. Highest in 40 years.

---

It will get worse before it gets better... The question remains: how long until it gets better?

caryking said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

Inflation hits 7.5%. Highest in 40 years.

---

It will get worse before it gets better... The question remains: how long until it gets better?

---

when the Fed stops pumping money and starts raising rates.

On the plus side, I was able to buy a tasty rotisserie whole chicken for lunch today for only $4.99. At Harris Teeter on top of that. Still can't believe they were charging that low of a price.

Oldsouljer said:

---

On the plus side, I was able to buy a tasty rotisserie whole chicken for lunch today for only $4.99. At Harris Teeter on top of that. Still can't believe they were charging that low of a price.

---

And I went to Amedeo's and spent $40 for my daughter and me…. Pizza is expensive, I guess!

Steve Videtich said:

---

Inflation hits 7.5%. Highest in 40 years.

---

This should have been announced to the tune of Welcome Back Carter.












Err, maybe it was Welcome Back Kotter but you get my point.