Civilized said:WarrenPeace said:hokiewolf said:
It's pretty entertaining that one can get mad at a politician both virtue signaling and not virtue signaling based on your personal politics. How about we all shouldn give a hoot what politicians post on Twitter and Facebook
That's a great idea! But since one party's leader was completely banned from social media because people didn't like what he said it's got to go both ways.
Please. "Because people didn't line what he said?" LOL, Yeah I guess I don't jump into the tiger enclosure at the zoo to get a selfie because "I don't like the way getting eaten by the tiger may make me feel."
He was banned from social media because he, the sitting President, wouldn't stop falsely proclaiming our free and fair and democratically held election was fraudulent. These false and completely self-serving claims started months before the election was even held, continued without evidence for a year, and culminated in an armed insurrection at the nation's capital.
He attacked our democracy in an extraordinarily dangerous way that no former president would even have dreamed of. He significantly damaged American faith in our electoral system for no more important reason than because he's a sore loser.
So yeah I guess some people "didn't like" that.
Who did like it? Did you?
No. The blatantly rigged "election" is the "attack on our democracy". This communist coup via a stolen election is an "attack on our democracy". The communist Democrat party who want to shred the 1st and 2nd Amendments are "attacking our democracy". People who have no problem stripping others of their right to free speech are "attacking democracy".
And our nation is a constitutional republic. Not a democracy.