caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

No one is really answering my question as to why the proposed absurd situation that Cawthorn said occurred would have any truth to it?

Instead I'm being told I shouldn't think it's not absolutely possible he made it up and then directed to a totally different senate candidates issue.

---

Absolute - completely or totally
Possible - being something that may or may not occur

---

LOL. Quit parsing words.....what Hokie has done is tell you what he clearly strongly believes. I agree with him in this case....i think at absolute minimum, the statement was a gross exaggeration.

We know you don't know. We accept that...we know from your earlier "up on the cross" lamentation that you don't want to make an assertion, because there is always a chance....but also know you're a smart guy, so tell us your intuition. In this case, what do you really believe.

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

No one is really answering my question as to why the proposed absurd situation that Cawthorn said occurred would have any truth to it?

Instead I'm being told I shouldn't think it's not absolutely possible he made it up and then directed to a totally different senate candidates issue.

---

Absolute - completely or totally
Possible - being something that may or may not occur

---

LOL. Quit parsing words.....what Hokie has done is tell you what he clearly strongly believes. I agree with him in this case....i think at absolute minimum, the statement was a gross exaggeration.

We know you don't know. We accept that...we know from your earlier "up on the cross" lamentation that you don't want to make an assertion, because there is always a chance....but also know you're a smart guy, so tell us your intuition. In this case, what do you really believe.

---

it's really fascinating that neither of you can admit that this was a ruse by Cawthorn to raise money. The guy is running on effective leadership. What has he done to produce such loyalty?

hokiewolf said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

No one is really answering my question as to why the proposed absurd situation that Cawthorn said occurred would have any truth to it?

Instead I'm being told I shouldn't think it's not absolutely possible he made it up and then directed to a totally different senate candidates issue.

---

Absolute - completely or totally
Possible - being something that may or may not occur

---

LOL. Quit parsing words.....what Hokie has done is tell you what he clearly strongly believes. I agree with him in this case....i think at absolute minimum, the statement was a gross exaggeration.

We know you don't know. We accept that...we know from your earlier "up on the cross" lamentation that you don't want to make an assertion, because there is always a chance....but also know you're a smart guy, so tell us your intuition. In this case, what do you really believe.

---

it's really fascinating that neither of you can admit that this was a ruse by Cawthorn to raise money. The guy is running on effective leadership. What has he done to produce such loyalty?

---

Exactly....its no different from when the candidates on the far left, like AOC, Omar and Tlaib, make really outrageous comments. Likely they don't even believe them, but they have a base hanging on it, willing to kick in more $$$

packgrad said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Lol. I mean seriously, lol. Hokie is like the most reasonable guy on this board.

Funny, in all the back and forth posts about the NC congressmen, I've seen one poster call other posters names and describe them in negative ways

Guess he was just having a moment being something less than he wants to be

---

Are you the one person? You mocked Cary's Christianity a week or so ago. Are you talking about yourself? Or are you talking about the guy a page ago calling posters Qers? Not sure who the one person is you're taking about.

---

LOL, mocked his Christianity....nahh, i called him on hypocrisy for preaching on here (like when he climbed up on his self-built cross just a few posts ago), but told me to "go f myself" because I asked him for proof on his election conspiracy theories.

I don't even know what a Qer is?

Packchem91 said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

No one is really answering my question as to why the proposed absurd situation that Cawthorn said occurred would have any truth to it?

Instead I'm being told I shouldn't think it's not absolutely possible he made it up and then directed to a totally different senate candidates issue.

---

Absolute - completely or totally
Possible - being something that may or may not occur

---

LOL. Quit parsing words.....what Hokie has done is tell you what he clearly strongly believes. I agree with him in this case....i think at absolute minimum, the statement was a gross exaggeration.

We know you don't know. We accept that...we know from your earlier "up on the cross" lamentation that you don't want to make an assertion, because there is always a chance....but also know you're a smart guy, so tell us your intuition. In this case, what do you really believe.

---

Chem, fair question… I really don't know much about Cawthorn; therefore, I do not have any reason to believe him. That said, you know I'm an America First person and support any candidate that expresses the same values and policies.

I don't keep up with him other than I remember he was doing an interview (do not even remember the subject) and he was embarrassed (my opinion) because he was very unprepared.

Now, I look at people like Liz Cheney and think: why is she even allowed to be in the Republican caucus. The only thing I can come up with is establishment people don't want her gone for some reason, perhaps money?

So, regarding Cawthorn, I support the agenda, not the person. If he truly is lying, then his day will come…

I brought up the Eric Grietens mess because this one may blow up in the face of Karl Rove. Personally, I hope it does because I think he is the epitome of establishment! I'll let this one play out for the facts…

Packchem91 said:

---

Lol. I mean seriously, lol. Hokie is like the most reasonable guy on this board.

Funny, in all the back and forth posts about the NC congressmen, I've seen one poster call other posters names and describe them in negative ways

Guess he was just having a moment being something less than he wants to be

---

I resent that chem....I happen to think that I'm the most reasonable guy on this board....lol

Packchem91 said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Lol. I mean seriously, lol. Hokie is like the most reasonable guy on this board.

Funny, in all the back and forth posts about the NC congressmen, I've seen one poster call other posters names and describe them in negative ways

Guess he was just having a moment being something less than he wants to be

---

Are you the one person? You mocked Cary's Christianity a week or so ago. Are you talking about yourself? Or are you talking about the guy a page ago calling posters Qers? Not sure who the one person is you're taking about.

---

LOL, mocked his Christianity....nahh, i called him on hypocrisy for preaching on here (like when he climbed up on his self-built cross just a few posts ago), but told me to "go f myself" because I asked him for proof on his election conspiracy theories.

I don't even know what a Qer is?

---

All Christian fall short of the glory of God. I called myself out for that.

cowboypack02 said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

Lol. I mean seriously, lol. Hokie is like the most reasonable guy on this board.

Funny, in all the back and forth posts about the NC congressmen, I've seen one poster call other posters names and describe them in negative ways

Guess he was just having a moment being something less than he wants to be

---

I resent that chem....I happen to think that I'm the most reasonable guy on this board....lol

---

like not is! I think you still have the prize!

Packchem91 said:

---

Hokie is like the most reasonable guy on this board.

---

Lol. Maybe to you...

A Fourth Grade teacher in Austin, TX is claiming that 20 out of 32 kids in her class have "come out" to her as "LGBTQIA+"

This is literally grooming.

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

All 100% false information.

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

All 100% false information.

---

Hey Steve, is that an absolute or opinion?

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

You sure they didn't say both of our US Senators…

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

All 100% false information.

---

Good one Hoke! :-)

What exactly is that?

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

All 100% false information.

---

You say so, mon.

Oldsouljer said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

All 100% false information.

---

You say so, mon.

---

I put a winking emoji on it, for sarcasm.

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

All 100% false information.

---

You say so, mon.

---

I put a winking emoji on it, for sarcasm.

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Steve Videtich said:

---

Oldsouljer said:

---

Actually, one doesn't have to believe or not believe Cawthorn on this particular issue, it's been well known that when newcomers get to DC, DC gets to work subverting the newcomers by any means necessary. One of George Holding's staffers told me that when he was moving into his congressional offices at the start of his first term, his office was overrun with lobbyists before they could even get the furniture in place. I've also been told by some insiders I'm acquainted with that one of our two US Senators has a sham marriage and shacks up with Lindsey Graham in DC.

---

All 100% false information.

---

You say so, mon.

---

I put a winking emoji on it, for sarcasm.

---

---

Image not showing.

caryking said:

---

What exactly is that?

---

One is a pic that's been floating around since March 2020ish. I'd not seen the other before this weekend. Can't say for certain. Let's simply say there is quite a bit of speculation on what may have already occurred. There are a few other night pics that are similar in addition to a video or two.

hokiewolf said:

---

RunsWithWolves26 said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

What exactly is that?

---

One is a pic that's been floating around since March 2020ish. I'd not seen the other before this weekend. Can't say for certain. Let's simply say there is quite a bit of speculation on what may have already occurred. There are a few other night pics that are similar in addition to a video or two.

---

So basically you posted a picture that you have no clue what it actually is. Basically posting random stuff.

---

WHY ARE YOUR EYES CLOSED /s

---

Ha; its a pic.......maybe you can tell us. I'm sharing a pic hoping someone might know what it might be. Odd that the structure is across from the White House and no longer exists.

Always haters........you still not over my posting truth on the VIRUS thread. The site where some of you guys hyped fears resulting in a bunch of people taking EUA jabs. You resent the fact that I post info that has not been censored......with my primary stated purposed to PROVIDE you and your LOVED ONES with alternative information that might make you think twice before taking boosters. When all of this is said and done you may wish I had known earlier of the thread in Water Cooler....so I could have posted the alternative info. I first learned of the dangers of jabs as far back as March 2021.

As the saying goes..........when fleas have been sealed up in a closed jar and the jar lid is removed, those fleas don't know how to jump out.

Again; my purpose was for the good of all.

You're say the virus info was hearsay?

RunsWithWolves26 said:

---

Your purpose was to and always is to, troll, whether it's this thread of the virus thread. You post hearsay, assumptive garbage and think it's ok. At some point, when you run off enough people, maybe James will care. Until then, I guess you can keep trolling along.

---

No, it is NOT the definition of "trolling", as defined by Steve Williams when he laid out the rules, as I recall. The form of "trolling" that is against the rules is when you basically post material to goad someone into a "personal" back-and-forth type of argument -- eg, with little snarky comments that escalate into full-blown personal arguments. The rule against "trolling" was part of the larger rule to not engage in personal attacks.

Werewolf is simply posting information that you disagree with, and others may disagree with, because they believe that only information that comes from the far Left Establishment Lamestream media is "truthful". Werewolf is not breaking any rules whatsoever.

Again, the TRUE false information and garbage comes from the far Left Establishment Lamestream media. They are feeding us lies about "covid", the "vaccines", and virtually everything else.

It is not against the rules to post "false" information. Steve laid out no such rule. And there never should be. Because that is what is up for debate. You can't have one group deciding what is a "false" view, and then censoring all other views. That would eviscerate the entire concept of freedom of speech, and being able to disagree with others and debate issues.

You want to just turn this thread into a "safe space" for only information approved as "truthful" by Fauci, Biden, communist "fact checkers", and the far Left Establishment media. You want outright viewpoint censorship.

One thing that Steve Williams made crystal clear is that we would not be censored for our viewpoints. Steve is the moderator here and laid out the rules. Not you.

Regretfully, you're upset. There is tons of info that support that you were duped.....

Shooting the messenger simply doesn't make it go away. I pray for you and your family and it is my hope that you seriously weight the options for future jabs.

Anyway, on the pics above, many people speculate that hangings have already occurred and these pics show a hangman's galley that was constructed and now dismantled. Citizen jounalists reported on Telegram.org of the blackouts etc at the White House that occurred for several months after Jan 20th last year. On the pic posted, it simply asked the question of what and when. I didn't claim it to be anything.............

There is something called DEVOLUTION and I believe that is what we're in. Whether we are in it or not may never become public.....Essentially, I believe America will watch trials, hangings and executions......but whether they occurred in 2020 or possibly shown in 2025 - let's say - as current I question