Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
waynecountywolf said:
Meadows: Okay. Alright. Mr. President, everyone is on the line. This is Mark Meadows, the chief of staff. Just so we all are aware. On the line is secretary of state and two other individuals. Jordan and Mr. Germany with him. You also have the attorneys that represent the president, Kurt and Alex and Cleta Mitchell who is not the attorney of record but has been involved myself and then the president. So Mr. President, I'll turn it over to you.
Trump: Okay, thank you very much. Hello Brad and Ryan and everybody. We appreciate the time and the call. So we've spent a lot of time on this, and if we could just go over some of the numbers, I think it's pretty clear that we won. We won very substantially in Georgia. You even see it by rally size, frankly. We'd be getting 25-30,000 people a rally, and the competition would get less than 100 people. And it never made sense.
But we have a number of things. We have at least 2 or 3 anywhere from 250 to 300,000 ballots were dropped mysteriously into the rolls. Much of that had to do with Fulton County, which hasn't been checked. We think that if you check the signatures a real check of the signatures going back in Fulton County you'll find at least a couple of hundred thousand of forged signatures of people who have been forged. And we are quite sure that's going to happen.
Another tremendous number. We're going to have an accurate number over the next two days with certified accountants. But an accurate number will be given, but it's in the 50s of thousands and that's people that went to vote and they were told they can't vote because they've already been voted for. And it's a very sad thing. They walked out complaining. But the number's large. We'll have it for you. But it's much more than the number of 11,779 that's the current margin is only 11,779. Brad, I think you agree with that, right? That's something I think everyone at least that's a number that everyone agrees on.
But that's the difference in the votes. But we've had hundreds of thousands of ballots that we're able to actually we'll get you a pretty accurate number. You don't need much of a number because the number that in theory I lost by, the margin would be 11,779. But you also have a substantial numbers of people, thousands and thousands, who went to the voting place on November 3, were told they couldn't vote, were told they couldn't vote because a ballot had been put on their name. And you know that's very, very, very, very sad.
We had, I believe it's about 4,502 voters who voted but who weren't on the voter registration list, so it's 4,502 who voted, but they weren't on the voter registration roll, which they had to be. You had 18,325 vacant address voters. The address was vacant, and they're not allowed to be counted. That's 18,325.
Smaller number you had 904 who only voted where they had just a P.O. a post office box number and they had a post office box number, and that's not allowed. We had at least 18,000 that's on tape, we had them counted very painstakingly 18,000 voters having to do with [name]. She's a vote scammer, a professional vote scammer and hustler [name]. That was the tape that's been shown all over the world that makes everybody look bad, you, me and everybody else.
Where they got number one they said very clearly and it's been reported that they said there was a major water main break. Everybody fled the area. And then they came back, [name] and her daughter and a few people. There were no Republican poll watchers. Actually, there were no Democrat poll watchers, I guess they were them. But there were no Democrats, either, and there was no law enforcement. Late in the morning, early in the morning, they went to the table with the black robe and the black shield, and they pulled out the votes. Those votes were put there a number of hours before the table was put there I think it was, Brad, you would know, it was probably eight hours or seven hours before, and then it was stuffed with votes.
They weren't in an official voter box; they were in what looked to be suitcases or trunks, suitcases, but they weren't in voter boxes. The minimum number it could be because we watched it, and they watched it certified in slow motion instant replay if you can believe it, but slow motion, and it was magnified many times over, and the minimum it was 18,000 ballots, all for Biden.
You had out-of-state voters. They voted in Georgia, but they were from out of state, of 4,925. You had absentee ballots sent to vacant, they were absentee ballots sent to vacant addresses. They had nothing on them about addresses, that's 2,326.................
Not gonna finish posting this dribble heck,here lets get to the gist::
DJT- He wrong and he gone.
Not one single person has disproven the data provided by Trump to be wrong. These numbers aren't pulled out of someone's ass. They are using data analyst and research to get the numbers. As I have said before, the numbers are the numbers... someone needs to disprove these numbers; rather, the SOS needs to sit down and go over the numbers they have and compare to what he has.
Cleta Mitchell asked the SOS, on this call, for the rolls and the SOS says nothing. In fact, Mitchell brought up that she has asked him multiple times and he refuses. Why? Sit down with her and put this crap to rest. Whether that's for or against Trump... I don't care! We just need to settle the masses who think this is rigged!
She asked for things she's not entitled to. He said that.
Those numbers ARE proven wrong. And Trump is the one who has to prove it, not the election people. They said right in the call, they checked the hand ballots against the machines, virtually the same. Then they did a manual recount, virtually the same. They said on the call they had or were investigating everything he claimed and had found nothing. You know, the part where the guy said:
'Raffensperger: Well, Mr. President, the challenge that you have is the data you have is wrong. We talked to the congressmen, and they were surprised."
They also said the watched the same tape Trump referenced, the ENTIRE tape, and said it didn't show what Trump said it did. They even stated that Rudy or someone with him selectively edited it. Trump didn't deny that or even address that statement.
He'd ask Cleta to verify something he said, then talk right over her and never let her do it. He asked questions and then didn't wait for responses. The man is delusional. They'd give him what they found and he just ignored it.
Hell, he didn't even agree with HER.
"Mitchell: I will tell you. I've seen the tape. The full tape. So has Alex. We've watched it. And what we saw and what we've confirmed in the timing is that they made everybody leave we have sworn affidavits saying that. And then they began to process ballots. And our estimate is that there were roughly 18,000 ballots. We don't know that. If you know that . . .
Trump: It was 18,000 ballots, but they used each one three times.
Mitchell: Well, I don't know about that.
Trump: I do think we had ours magnified out.
Mitchell: I've watched the entire tape."
He's telling his own attorney she doesn't know what she's talking about AND that he somehow has info she doe not. Good job, Mr President. You're trying to allege these things and you don't even give your own people the alleged data?
And LOL at "we had ours magnified out". What a load of crap. I've seen those tapes. They're not exactly 4k quality. It doesn't matter how much you 'zoom' it, you can't see much detail. He's going off the one where someone added in subtitles, and in that one you can't tell a damn thing the subtitles say is true, neither could whoever edited them in.
And BTW, they most certainly did NOT "use each ballot 3 times". Totally false and proven. Recounts would have caught that. That's pure parler or rumble BS there.
There's no way anyone that's reasonable can listen to that and not come away with a negative impression of Trump. There's no way you can think anything other than that he was pressuring the SOS to alter the outcome, which is VERY much an abuse of power. If a Dem was doing the exact same thing, you and others would be howling at the top of your lungs at how wrong this was.
Wrong is wrong, no matter who does it. And this was dead wrong, plus embarrassing to boot.
Again, you do "NOT" know what you are talking about!!!
She asked for things she's not entitled to. He said that. Why not? this is an election. He doesn't hold the keys to the entire car. Non-disclosures can be put in place to protect peoples names. Trump doesn't even want to be there. Let the analyst do the work.
Trump is a CEO with full command of the facts. That's what you heard. You probably have never worked in a situation where you get to see a business CEO work. Trump has the NY very aggressive style. You may nt like his style: however, you can't argue with him having control of the facts.
He's telling his own attorney she doesn't know what she's talking about AND that he somehow has info she doe not. Good job, Mr President. You're trying to allege these things and you don't even give your own people the alleged data?So what... That's your opinion. You don't like his style. That's noise, not substance!!
And BTW, they most certainly did NOT "use each ballot 3 times". Totally false and proven. Recounts would have caught that. That's pure parler or rumble BS there. Noise, not facts!!
BTW, you notice how The Washington Post blocked the names of the lady's in the video? Why didn't they do that for Matt Banyard, the analyst? You know why... they are creating noise, for people like you, not facts.
Guess what, Matt Banyard said he never said what Raffensburger calling he said. He is not happy about the guy using his name.
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…
“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”
Joe Biden