Election Interference/Fraud

274,996 Views | 3695 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by BBW12OG
Ground_Chuck
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 1:18p, 1/10/21
BBW12OG said:
Ground_Chuck said:
Steve Williams said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Steve Williams said:
Didn't want to start a new thread but was just reading where Apple and Amazon are shutting down access to Parler, an alternative Twitter-like website primarily used by conservatives. Appears Parler may be forced off line until they find another host. Pretty scary to think of the power big tech has.
The logic they are using is only being applied in certain situations, which is why people are upset. There are literally calls from the Ayatollah to eradicate the Jews and official Chinese Embassy accounts promoting the "good outcomes" of the genocide of the Uyghurs, but their accounts haven't been suspended and the tweets are still up.

They are only adding gasoline to the fire at this point. The longer this goes on, the less likely there is a good outcome.
Yeah, the hypocrisy is very disturbing. On Twitter, in particular, there was a long period of time where if you did a search on #WPN it would take you to a nudist colony that exploited children. That they apply certain rules to those with differing political views is only going to feed the fire.


So you are saying the nudist colony was removed from Twitter? So the rules were applied?
That's your response? Wow........... "good for me but not for thee..." The indoctrination into the flock worked well on you I see.
That's what you got from that response?

You either believe Twitter has the right to remove content they don't what on their site or not. You either agree that they can remove nudist and trump or you don't. I
Reply Quote
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Ground_Chuck • 1:25p, 1/10/21
Nm
Reply Quote
2 edits
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 1:27p, 1/10/21
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
cowboypack02 said:
IseWolf22 said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
packgrad said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Steve Williams said:
Didn't want to start a new thread but was just reading where Apple and Amazon are shutting down access to Parler, an alternative Twitter-like website primarily used by conservatives. Appears Parler may be forced off line until they find another host. Pretty scary to think of the power big tech has.
The logic they are using is only being applied in certain situations, which is why people are upset. There are literally calls from the Ayatollah to eradicate the Jews and official Chinese Embassy accounts promoting the "good outcomes" of the genocide of the Uyghurs, but their accounts haven't been suspended and the tweets are still up.

They are only adding gasoline to the fire at this point. The longer this goes on, the less likely there is a good outcome.


Correct. You truly have to have your head in the sand to continue to brush away what's happening in supposed defense of capitalism. Initially the defenders said it was fine for big tech to silence certain groups as they are private companies and that other companies would come up to replace them where voices could be heard. Now big tech is silencing the new companies and another excuse is being thrown about. Sheep being led to slaughter.

What do you want the government to do about it? Be specific. What legislation would you propose and how would it be worded?

Private companies are deciding who they do an do not want to do business with.

Repealing section 230 wouldn't help you here. Breaking up tech companies would only help by creating more distinct entities, who could or could not make the same decision.
So what's the solution? Not every problem is society can or should be solved by government.
The bell company is the proper course for these tech companies. They are, in fact, utilities now. Not when they began, but now they are and should be labeled as such. You let the actions go from there...


Social media is not so central to our lives that it should qualify as a utility. Your analogy would apply to internet service, not websites and platforms themselves. A better analogy would be a newspaper being required to print stories written by anyone.

There are also many competing platforms. Are you going to nationalize them all? Stop giving your business to companies you don't like. Tech comes and goes. People have shown they are willing to move to a superior product. Remember when microsoft was a "monopoly" in internet browsers? It's not any longer. Where was Tik Tok 2 years ago? Young people barely use Facebook.


A judge ruled that Twitter was the new public square, and as such the president couldn't block anyone. That seems to make the platform pretty important in the way we move information now.

Yes, one judge, and IMO a poor ruling. Entrenching it further is piling on more of the bad.

Twitter won't be this dominant in 20 years...unless we regulate it and entrench it against competition
Judges get it wrong when these people don't agree; however, they use them as the standard for the Trump cases.

Hypocrisy?

60 cases vs 1.
Dismissed for lack of evidence and standing vs. a subjective interpretation of the 1st amendment
Actually, no more than 5 had en evidentiary hearing. I'm not even sure any did. So, your comparative is way off. At some point, you need to give up because you are showing you lack of grasp on the receipts.

At best 5 vs 1 and probably 0 vs 1.

So many of these judges spoke specifically to the profound lack of evidence, whether or not there was an evidentiary hearing.

In many instances they asked explicitly if the attorneys had any evidence of fraud, and the attorneys always said no.
Reply Quote
1
statefan91
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
1:53p, 1/10/21

Reply Quote
1 edit
BBW12OG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 1:54p, 1/10/21
Had those same judges ruled differently you and I both know you'd be the first one crying that a "Trump judge" ruled in his favor. Spare me you holier than thou persona. We all know what you believe and what you and your party want this country to look and be like. You have zero footing with me on any topic matter.
Reply Quote
BBW12OG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:04p, 1/10/21


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 2:06p, 1/10/21
Civilized said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
cowboypack02 said:
IseWolf22 said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
packgrad said:
FlossyDFlynt said:
Steve Williams said:
Didn't want to start a new thread but was just reading where Apple and Amazon are shutting down access to Parler, an alternative Twitter-like website primarily used by conservatives. Appears Parler may be forced off line until they find another host. Pretty scary to think of the power big tech has.
The logic they are using is only being applied in certain situations, which is why people are upset. There are literally calls from the Ayatollah to eradicate the Jews and official Chinese Embassy accounts promoting the "good outcomes" of the genocide of the Uyghurs, but their accounts haven't been suspended and the tweets are still up.

They are only adding gasoline to the fire at this point. The longer this goes on, the less likely there is a good outcome.


Correct. You truly have to have your head in the sand to continue to brush away what's happening in supposed defense of capitalism. Initially the defenders said it was fine for big tech to silence certain groups as they are private companies and that other companies would come up to replace them where voices could be heard. Now big tech is silencing the new companies and another excuse is being thrown about. Sheep being led to slaughter.

What do you want the government to do about it? Be specific. What legislation would you propose and how would it be worded?

Private companies are deciding who they do an do not want to do business with.

Repealing section 230 wouldn't help you here. Breaking up tech companies would only help by creating more distinct entities, who could or could not make the same decision.
So what's the solution? Not every problem is society can or should be solved by government.
The bell company is the proper course for these tech companies. They are, in fact, utilities now. Not when they began, but now they are and should be labeled as such. You let the actions go from there...


Social media is not so central to our lives that it should qualify as a utility. Your analogy would apply to internet service, not websites and platforms themselves. A better analogy would be a newspaper being required to print stories written by anyone.

There are also many competing platforms. Are you going to nationalize them all? Stop giving your business to companies you don't like. Tech comes and goes. People have shown they are willing to move to a superior product. Remember when microsoft was a "monopoly" in internet browsers? It's not any longer. Where was Tik Tok 2 years ago? Young people barely use Facebook.


A judge ruled that Twitter was the new public square, and as such the president couldn't block anyone. That seems to make the platform pretty important in the way we move information now.

Yes, one judge, and IMO a poor ruling. Entrenching it further is piling on more of the bad.

Twitter won't be this dominant in 20 years...unless we regulate it and entrench it against competition
Judges get it wrong when these people don't agree; however, they use them as the standard for the Trump cases.

Hypocrisy?

60 cases vs 1.
Dismissed for lack of evidence and standing vs. a subjective interpretation of the 1st amendment
Actually, no more than 5 had en evidentiary hearing. I'm not even sure any did. So, your comparative is way off. At some point, you need to give up because you are showing you lack of grasp on the receipts.

At best 5 vs 1 and probably 0 vs 1.

So many of these judges spoke specifically to the profound lack of evidence, whether or not there was an evidentiary hearing.

In many instances they asked explicitly if the attorneys had any evidence of fraud, and the attorneys always said no.


Sorry, that's not how the system works. In order to rule against the receipts, you need to have an evidentiary hearing. That is why they always ruled on laches or no standing.

You can't just remake our whole judiciary system. Even at that, they are probably the same people that allowed for an unconstitutional changing of election laws. Only the legislatures can set and/or change laws. Each of the those judges should be stripped from their position on the courts. They are tarnished!!!!!
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 2:09p, 1/10/21
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
1
BBW12OG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 2:11p, 1/10/21
More proof that it's real than the pee tape that launched a three year investigation......................
Reply Quote
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 2:14p, 1/10/21
BBW12OG said:
Had those same judges ruled differently you and I both know you'd be the first one crying that a "Trump judge" ruled in his favor. Spare me you holier than thou persona. We all know what you believe and what you and your party want this country to look and be like. You have zero footing with me on any topic matter.

You OK?
Reply Quote
1
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 2:17p, 1/10/21
BBW12OG said:

Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.

Seems legit.

Fire Herb?
Reply Quote
4
Pacfanweb
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 2:53p, 1/10/21
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Reply Quote
2
packgrad
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:57p, 1/10/21
Jack celebrating the tech collusion to take down his competitor?

Reply Quote
cowboypack02
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboypack02 • 3:11p, 1/10/21
cowboypack02 said:
I have seen several people who have commented about an armed insurrection last week. I could of missed it but the only people that seemed to be armed were police. None of the images of people in the capital building showed any weapons at all.

Was storming the capital building a bad idea...absolutely. Unfortunately everyone in the media and the democrat politicians seem to have the same message and are using key words such as insurrection and sedition. They are all talking about the president being removed but everyone seems to gloss over the fact that this seems to be a normal thing. We can look at a few examples over the last few years.

  • Alexandria Ocasio Cortez lead a group of protester into the capital building and stormed Nancy Pelosi's office two years ago
  • The Hart Senate Building was stormed by protestors during the Kavanaugh senate hearings and confirmations
  • The President had to be moved to a bunker by secret service during the DC riots last year because protestors were tearing down barriers that had been established by the secret service to protect the White House
  • Protestors in Portland tried to gain access to a federal courthouse by beating on the doors and windows with crowbars and hammers. Those protesters had to be turned away by armed troops. Fires were lit near the courthouse in attempts to burn it down
  • Wisconsin's capital building was occupied by protesters for weeks as republicans attempted to pass a bill.
  • The Capital Hill Autonomous Zone was set up by rioters and protesters in Seattle. This included cordoning off 6 city blocks and taking over a sheriff's office. The leaders of the riot said that they had set up their own autonomous country and government. (this is actual sedition)
  • Protestors in almost every major city in the country rioted and burned buildings and vehicles. State and federal property was destroyed on a massive scale.

We can also talk about the words and actions of politicians what were extremely inflammatory. Everyone treats Trump as some sort of crazed man, and he does like to stick his foot in his mouth, but I don't think that he has done anything outside of what other politicians have done

  • Nancy Pelosi met with the Joint Chiefs on Friday to discuss not allowing Trump to use his presidential powers that have been granted by the constitution. That is quite literally a discussion on a potential coup.
  • Democrat congressmen have objected to every republican presidents electoral college votes since 2000. I don't think this is a problem because that is a process that is laid out in the constitution. Republicans are being vilified for doing the exact same thing now.
  • Maxine Waters, who is a democrat congressman) told people to get in the face of republicans that they saw in public and draw a crowd.
  • Kamala Harris paid the bail for rioters who burnt down cities this past year. This included the people who attempted to set up their own country within Seattle. This is sedition
  • Democrat politicians cheering on the rioting and burning down of cities.
  • Over 70 democrats refused to attend Trump's inauguration in 2017.
  • AOC marched protesters into Nancy Pelosi's office after giving a speech
  • During the protest during Trump's inauguration one of the speakers said "I've thought a lot about blowing up the white house"
  • Lots of democrat politicians spent 4 years telling us that Trump was illegitimate



Finally, I want to touch on Trump and other republicans being suspended from twitter. Back in 2018 a judge ruled that Trump couldn't block people because twitter was a public square. If that is the case then politicians shouldn't be able to block people, because legally twitter is considered a public square. Unfortunately this law isn't enforced equally across the board. I see democrat politicians blocking people all the time. I am all for twitter enforcing their terms and conditions on trump and other users, but those rules aren't enforced equally across the board. I spent 15-20 minutes on twitter this morning and found the following: porn (lots and lots of porn), harassment of users, vile and racist comments, dictators commenting on genocide, pictures of effigies of Trump being hung, burnt and destroyed, one "popular" comedian holding a very bloody head that was made to look like Trump, and a lot of comments on how the republican party and trump needed to be punished. All of these are against the Terms and Conditions of twitter, but these are allowed to remain. If this is the case then when is Trump removed?



I can't believe that I forgot to add these as well:

Multiple republican congressmen shot at during baseball practice before congressional game by democrat supporter

Ran Paul assaulted in front of his home by democrat neighbor. There was a ton of cheering for this one in the twitterverse
Reply Quote
3
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pacfanweb • 3:18p, 1/10/21
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
1 edit
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:39p, 1/10/21
You on the left... disprove this tweet.


On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
1
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:51p, 1/10/21
I wonder if Jack expected this...

https://populist.press/gab-ceo-has-massive-surprise-for-anti-trumpers-this-is-genius/

On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
Pacfanweb
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 4:36p, 1/10/21
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment
Reply Quote
7
IseWolf22
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pacfanweb • 4:57p, 1/10/21
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Reply Quote
3
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pacfanweb • 5:06p, 1/10/21
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment
Who is the anyone? It must be BBW; therefore, you made it personal. You just don't know how to take the high road. Then, you have the audacity to call me out as a baby.

Let me teach you how to respond to my post...

BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.

Yea, I agree. That one looks like it needs to be authenticated. If Nancy actually sent that letter, then, that isn't good.


Take an adult position and post with respect. Serious question, are you able to do that?
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to IseWolf22 • 5:07p, 1/10/21
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
BBW12OG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:14p, 1/10/21
I see the free loader is over here "slumming" it again after bashing this site and making several personal insults about posters over here. I am not a mod or owner but pacfanweb needs to be banned. That's my opinion and my right to have and express.
Reply Quote
Pacfanweb
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to BBW12OG • 6:00p, 1/10/21
BBW12OG said:
I see the free loader is over here "slumming" it again after bashing this site and making several personal insults about posters over here. I am not a mod or owner but pacfanweb needs to be banned. That's my opinion and my right to have and express.
You know, I had ceased responding to your posts because the only thing you do is flame, taunt, hurl insults and negative commentary towards most everyone. That's on top of admitting to at least 2 aliases at the other site (seriously, who has more than one?) and being banned. Wonder why that was? I'd say your posting history here makes it pretty obvious.

So, I'll make an exception here, because you are straight up lying.

I have absolutely NOT bashed this site, or made any personal insults about the posters here. The only thing I've said on the other site was how I found out here that I was somehow a commie socialist liberal, and I believe I might have made a flat earth reference. That's it. And those have been a bit now.

Of course, it's funny how I'm able to post over there, since you claimed I was banned because "that's what you heard"....which was, of course, yet another lie. You didn't hear that because it was never true, along with your claims that I was a liberal "based on my posting history there"....which is absolutely laughable if you had actually ever read any of my postings over the years.

So you're free to have whatever opinion you want, but just know that what you're basing it on is dead wrong, new guy.

In case you didn't realize it, this is a free board and I've been here quite a bit longer than you have. You show up immediately calling people out and hurling insults (again, this is easily verified by your posting history) and then just because you don't agree with someone (especially since you're on the wrong side of history here) you want them banned?

I've never called for anyone to be, but if anyone here needs to be shown the door, it's you. If there's a pot stirrer among us at ALL, it's you. If there's anyone who's been getting warnings or posts removed here, it's you. Not me.

So if the mods want to ban me for absolutely nothing, I guess there's a first time for everything since I've never been banned (or even warned of it) anywhere. But we know you can't say that, and we can see why, as you are literally THE most abrasive and caustic poster here, and it's not close.
Reply Quote
9
1 edit
Pacfanweb
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 6:04p, 1/10/21
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...
Oh yeah, Ise is definitely a master troller. LOL. Of all the folks here, both the poster accused of being one, and by whom....laughable on both counts.

You and BBW are single-handedly (or double handedly, I guess) going to make James do away with the Water Cooler. There was never any issues or folks crying for bans and to the mods before you two showed up recently.
Reply Quote
5
IseWolf22
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 6:10p, 1/10/21
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...

Lol, you may be the first person to ever accuse me of being a flamethrower, or anything similar.
I'm far from the most abrasive person on the water cooler and you're welcome to compare it against others
Reply Quote
7
Civilized
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 6:14p, 1/10/21
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...

Stop it man. ISE may be the least inflammatory and most straightforward dude on this board.
Reply Quote
8
BBW12OG
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:21p, 1/10/21
Yeah...I stand by my comments. You were making fun of this board and the posters with the rest of your slap happy group of liberals. Say all you want. Doesn't matter to me in the least. You are who you are. Best of luck to you.
Reply Quote
gpwncsu
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboypack02 • 7:35p, 1/10/21
Folks that overran the capital police consisted of armed folks. Let's not forget the three vehicles with explosives that were found at a couple of locations.
Reply Quote
4
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pacfanweb • 7:35p, 1/10/21
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...
Oh yeah, Ise is definitely a master troller. LOL. Of all the folks here, both the poster accused of being one, and by whom....laughable on both counts.

You and BBW are single-handedly (or double handedly, I guess) going to make James do away with the Water Cooler. There was never any issues or folks crying for bans and to the mods before you two showed up recently.
Actually, I did propose making the Water Cooler part of the pay. It will definitely do some good to get people like you to pony up or out of here.

BTW, I've been here since the first day of this site. Oh and yes, I've been paying from the beginning. The only reason I have complained is because several people, with conservative views, have been censored.
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Civilized • 7:37p, 1/10/21
Civilized said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...

Stop it man. ISE may be the least inflammatory and most straightforward dude on this board.
Civ, stop what... I see you and ISE as the same. I suppose you are only second to him, right?
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
Pacfanweb
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:50p, 1/10/21
Prove it. Go get the quote. Or admit you're lying.

Better yet, I'll do it for you:

Last thing I referenced this site with was this:

Quote:
tallwolf said... (original post)I do not miss northwolf
show more

Go to TOS and you'll remind yourself why"

Yeah, that's really making fun of the site, isn't it? I was specifically responding to someone talking about Northwolf.

The only other post I referenced this site was this one:

Quote:
Quote:
waynecountywolf said... (original post)
I am learning from a poster elsewhere about how the earth is flat

show less
I've learned at the same site that my posting history here evidently indicates that I am a liberal democrat suffering from TDS
Who knew..."

Boy, I was really letting the folks over here have it right there, wasn't I? LOL

So..."stand by your claim" all you want, but as everyone can see, you're wrong. I'd love to know what part of these two make up "several personal insults".

If you classify these two posts (which are the only one's I've referenced this site or anyone from this site on) as "bashing this site and making several personal insults about posters over here", then you should seek help.

Or learn to tell the truth. And if any of the mods think either post is doing such, by all means let me know. But I think it's plain to see that once again, BBW is lying about me. (and others)
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
Pacfanweb
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to caryking • 7:51p, 1/10/21
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...
Oh yeah, Ise is definitely a master troller. LOL. Of all the folks here, both the poster accused of being one, and by whom....laughable on both counts.

You and BBW are single-handedly (or double handedly, I guess) going to make James do away with the Water Cooler. There was never any issues or folks crying for bans and to the mods before you two showed up recently.
Actually, I did propose making the Water Cooler part of the pay. It will definitely do some good to get people like you to pony up or out of here.

BTW, I've been here since the first day of this site. Oh and yes, I've been paying from the beginning. The only reason I have complained is because several people, with conservative views, have been censored.
It's not the conservative views that got you censored. And you know it.
Reply Quote
caryking
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Pacfanweb • 8:31p, 1/10/21
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
IseWolf22 said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
Pacfanweb said:
pineknollshoresking said:
BBW12OG said:


Just wanted to leave this here for our socialist friends to ponder over and determine just how to spin this.


BBW, no offense, but that needs to be authenticated. That is so damning to Nancy and the Democratic Party that it's hard to believe that it's real.
It's hard to believe anyone BELIEVES it's real.
Typical spin by a liberal progressive. What I said was that it needs to be authenticated. You make it personal... you just cant help yourself, can you?

How was what I said personal? Stop being such a baby. It was a general comment

If you're a "liberal progressive" now then 75% of the US is liberal.
Isle, you have shown yourself to be a flame thrower. Do me a favor and just stay out...
Oh yeah, Ise is definitely a master troller. LOL. Of all the folks here, both the poster accused of being one, and by whom....laughable on both counts.

You and BBW are single-handedly (or double handedly, I guess) going to make James do away with the Water Cooler. There was never any issues or folks crying for bans and to the mods before you two showed up recently.
Actually, I did propose making the Water Cooler part of the pay. It will definitely do some good to get people like you to pony up or out of here.

BTW, I've been here since the first day of this site. Oh and yes, I've been paying from the beginning. The only reason I have complained is because several people, with conservative views, have been censored.
It's not the conservative views that got you censored. And you know it.
And, I didn't say it was... hopefully, I was the one that elicited Steve post about decorum. Yes, I made a complaint about the way people were being censored. I wasn't the only one.

Truth of the matter, it's there business; however, I asked them to consider how libel they could be for the selective censoring the mods are doing. I saw what appeared to be an out of control mod.

You know we have a DM feature here? People use it to express concerns among themselves and not exclusively in the forums.

I'll never forget what Tom Gugliotta said to a young kid.. the kid was wearing a UNC hat and was asking for his autograph. A person spoke up and asked Tom: are you going to sign an autograph for that kid while wearing that hat? Tom said: it's a childhood disease. He'll grow out of it one day.

That response Tom gave is a comparative response by wise people when they get older. These progressives will grow out of it. It's fun being a progressive when you are young, when you get older, you realize your misguided beliefs...
On the illegal or criminal immigrants…

“they built the country, the reason our economy is growing”

Joe Biden
Reply Quote
Pacfanweb
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:51p, 1/10/21
I never was all that progressive, and whatever I had I grew out of in my early twenties. That was 30 years ago
Reply Quote
1
ciscopack
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:12p, 1/10/21
Last weekend, President Trump called Georgia's secretary of state, Brad Raffensperger, imploring him with veiled threats and lies to change the outcome of the November election. Raffensperger talks to Scott Pelley about why he didn't give in. Air Date: Jan 10, 2021
Reply Quote
1
First Page Last Page
Page 83 of 106 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.