(20) Africa United - Black Business on Twitter: "#SayNoToVaccineMandate 75 Fully vaccinated athletes "suddenly" died in only 5 months?? https://t.co/x4JKw5JAHp" / Twitter

Google Search Trend for "Died Suddenly" Reaches All-Time High in Last Two Months (thegatewaypundit.com)

Google "DIED SUDDENLY"............it is working now......but expect it to be censored soon. Then utilize "DUCK DUCK GO" to search

Dear God DO NOT Get The Vaccines! COVID Shots Will "DECIMATE World Population" Warns Dr. Bhakdi (*****ute.com)

This is a good thread on Twitter and worth the read

I was honored to speak w/ @MdPublicSchools Board of Ed about off-ramps for masks in schools alongside @LawrenceGostin & Monique J. Soileau-Burke, MD

1/25https://t.co/PE2Kw0qP5N

— Lucy McBride, MD (@drlucymcbride) November 19, 2021

Dr. Tenpenny & General Flynn Expose How Medical & Monetary Fraud Is Being Used to Destroy America (rumble.com)

ACIP is reviewing the booster data. Pfizer's slide only shows data for between greater than 7 days and less than 2 months.

So, no ****, it is effective for 2 months. The original vaccine was effective for that long. What about at 6 months.

FDA Authorizes Pfizer and Moderna Boosters for Adults

Quote:

---

"The FDA has determined that the currently available data support expanding the eligibility of a single booster dose of the Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines to individuals 18 years of age and older," Peter Marks, M.D., Ph.D., director of the FDA's Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research said. "Streamlining the eligibility criteria and making booster doses available to all individuals 18 years of age and older will also help to eliminate confusion about who may receive a booster dose and ensure booster doses are available to all who may need one."

Qualified people are eligible to receive the booster six months after their second shot of either the Pfizer or Modern vaccine was administered, the FDA confirmed. For those who received the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, the booster is available to them two months after the single dose.

---

Wayland said:

---

ACIP is reviewing the booster data. Pfizer's slide only shows data for between greater than 7 days and less than 2 months.

So, no ****, it is effective for 2 months. The original vaccine was effective for that long. What about at 6 months.

---

https://www.timesofisrael.com/pfizer-booster-shot-could-offer-protection-for-9-10-months-initial-data/

Who knows? Only time will tell. But this makes sense based on what I've read.

How do they define "effective?" Effective at what? Did they say?

Mormad said:

---

Wayland said:

---

ACIP is reviewing the booster data. Pfizer's slide only shows data for between greater than 7 days and less than 2 months.

So, no ****, it is effective for 2 months. The original vaccine was effective for that long. What about at 6 months.

---

https://www.timesofisrael.com/pfizer-booster-shot-could-offer-protection-for-9-10-months-initial-data/

Who knows? Only time will tell. But this makes sense based on what I've read.

How do they define "effective?" Effective at what? Did they say?

---

I believe it was symptomatic infection, but now don't recall.

If this is the silver bullet, that is great.

But again, I am old enough to remember when the original series was 100% effective, so I am happy to wait a year.

Mormad said:

---

Wayland said:

---

ACIP is reviewing the booster data. Pfizer's slide only shows data for between greater than 7 days and less than 2 months.

So, no ****, it is effective for 2 months. The original vaccine was effective for that long. What about at 6 months.

---

https://www.timesofisrael.com/pfizer-booster-shot-could-offer-protection-for-9-10-months-initial-data/

Who knows? Only time will tell. But this makes sense based on what I've read.
How do they define "effective?" Effective at what? Did they say?

---

The article doesn't explain the prediction of effectiveness for 9 months but I assume they are testing Abs levels multiple times and projecting the decline rate will match some threshold after that period. Do you know if that is how this is done?

PackFansXL said:

---

Mormad said:

---

Wayland said:

---

ACIP is reviewing the booster data. Pfizer's slide only shows data for between greater than 7 days and less than 2 months.

So, no ****, it is effective for 2 months. The original vaccine was effective for that long. What about at 6 months.

---

https://www.timesofisrael.com/pfizer-booster-shot-could-offer-protection-for-9-10-months-initial-data/

Who knows? Only time will tell. But this makes sense based on what I've read.
How do they define "effective?" Effective at what? Did they say?

---

The article doesn't explain the prediction of effectiveness for 9 months but I assume they are testing Abs levels multiple times and projecting the decline rate will match some threshold after that period. Do you know if that is how this is done?

---

I don't know. I hope I'll get an email with the study when available. Important info. I posted a meta-analysis on the previous page that offers some insight. The vax seems to give at least 6 months Ab protection, the Ab half life appears to be 108 d, and the boosters seem to create even more robust Ab production so the Israeli numbers seem reasonable.

Doctor Hovis on Hospital Mandate / American Freedom (rumble.com)

Spartanburg Regional

https://www.facebook.com/messenger_media/?thread_id=4144749042229993&attachment_id=612232993535404&message_id=mid.%24gAA65oJZYYumDbGc0xl9OyF5dT4k6

https://www.bmj.com/content/375/bmj-2021-068302

Really easy to read meta-analysis on the effectiveness of non-pharm mitigation on covid R, incidence, and mortality. Lots of limitations of such a study, which they do a good job pointing out limitations and biases. The best part of the study is quick, easy access to all the studies they link if one were ever interested.

Ok

HHS Regions 1, 2 & 3 coming to life like clockwork. Almost the exact same dates and rates of cases. But tell me again how vax rates and mask behaviors are the key to all of this? pic.twitter.com/bxnUta3aq0

— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) November 20, 2021

Wayland said:

---

HHS Regions 1, 2 & 3 coming to life like clockwork. Almost the exact same dates and rates of cases. But tell me again how vax rates and mask behaviors are the key to all of this? pic.twitter.com/bxnUta3aq0

— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) November 20, 2021

---

Won't vax rates greatly reduce the impact from a hospitalizations and death standpoint, i.e., de-fanging the virus like Davie and Mormad have talked about? It seems like cases are here to stay and are seasonal like you've mentioned.

statefan91 said:

---

Wayland said:

---

HHS Regions 1, 2 & 3 coming to life like clockwork. Almost the exact same dates and rates of cases. But tell me again how vax rates and mask behaviors are the key to all of this? pic.twitter.com/bxnUta3aq0

— Justin Hart (@justin_hart) November 20, 2021

---

Won't vax rates greatly reduce the impact from a hospitalizations and death standpoint, i.e., de-fanging the virus like Davie and Mormad have talked about? It seems like cases are here to stay and are seasonal like you've mentioned.

---

That is the hope and what we should see.

But the number one metric the CDC and local authorities look at is cases.

Got it - yeah seems like cases need to not be looked at as vax rates + therapeutics get approval. There are going to be cases, and it's impossible to tell who is / isn't testing and why. Need to focus on hospitalizations / death / ensuring access to vaccine + therapeutics in my amateur opinion.

statefan91 said:

---

Got it - yeah seems like cases need to not be looked at as vax rates + therapeutics get approval. There are going to be cases, and it's impossible to tell who is / isn't testing and why. Need to focus on hospitalizations / death / ensuring access to vaccine + therapeutics in my amateur opinion.

---

I agree with you. The tweet has a little false logic as we all know. One can't look solely at case rates and suggest conclusions about the effectiveness or role of vaccines/PPE without further info. So i looked at the states he lists.

Cases are indeed here to stay, but every state reported increased testing, a 5-7% pos rate, anywhere from 80%(NY) to 88-95%(everybody else) of cases being among the unvaxxed, a 1-2% pos rate among the vaxxed, 0.03% hosp rate and 0.013% death rate among the vaxxed, and 90% of hospitalizations and 95% of reported deaths being unvaxxed.
I can post specific numbers for each state if anybody is interested.

Even with waning humoral immunity, these numbers suggest the vaxxes still appear to reduce your risk of not only hospitalization and death, but also contracting (symptomatic) disease. (Who knows how many people have mild or no sxs and don't get tested). That shouldn't be that surprising given that's how circulating Abs and memory cells work. Obviously, the effectiveness of the vaccines in preventing disease and transmission decays over time as we now know, but during the time of high humoral immunity after infection/immunization those Abs (in the immunocompetent) should bind and kill virus to reduce risk of viral loads that cause disease and transmission to some degree.

Here are some NC case numbers before data gets crazy with holidays.





It looks like Eastern NC counties cases haven't bounced quite as high yet. Will be interesting to watch going forward.

Will also be interesting to watch hospital numbers. (and the weekly flu report)

three world renowned experts risk livelihood and personal safety

If you've not been vaccinated, please take the time to listen to these three global experts discussing this topic. It may save your life.

If you've been vaccinated, please - please - listen from the 1:36 to the 1:48 mark.

Daviewolf83 said:

---

I just replied to the latest scary holiday tweet from WRAL about cases rising for the past nine days and reaching the highest number since October 29 with the following (I included the graph you see below):

"Daily hospital admissions for this same period are trending flat (7-day avg). Since we now have vaccines effective at preventing serious illness, hospitalization, and death for all known variants, not all cases are equal. Focus should be on hospitalizations and not cases."

---

I like that you did admissions here, since I think there is an unknown floor to hospitalizations for the 'long term' patients that don't cycle quite the same. Still wish we had a better FOR/WITH designation.

Hopefully we can keep those numbers down for the next month or so until the main part of the winter wave rolls through.



EDIT: Ideally if there is a wave, it plays out more like the spring 2021 wave as opposed to last winter or summer 2021. Ideally, ideally, things fizzle out completely.....

Wayland said:

---

Daviewolf83 said:

---

I just replied to the latest scary holiday tweet from WRAL about cases rising for the past nine days and reaching the highest number since October 29 with the following (I included the graph you see below):

"Daily hospital admissions for this same period are trending flat (7-day avg). Since we now have vaccines effective at preventing serious illness, hospitalization, and death for all known variants, not all cases are equal. Focus should be on hospitalizations and not cases."

---

I like that you did admissions here, since I think there is an unknown floor to hospitalizations for the 'long term' patients that don't cycle quite the same. Still wish we had a better FOR/WITH designation.

Hopefully we can keep those numbers down for the next month or so until the main part of the winter wave rolls through.

---

Will see how much the orange line starts to pull up to follow cases as backlog comes in.

I can confirm there are plenty of WITH numbers