Official Tim Corbin is a punk a** b*tch thread

59,451 Views | 273 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by WPNfamily
DrummerboyWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Someone also said that the unvaccinated players were waiting until the season was over because they didn't want any side effects to interfere. It's total BS that we were not allowed to play. Only two guys were showing symptoms. The rest should be able to play.
Being an N. C. State fan builds great character!
Wolfpacklife
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FourOaksWolf said:

wilmwolf80 said:

I know it's hard to keep up with everything with so many threads, but please read my post from the now locked vaccination thread.

"Per information from gooack1979, the whole team was scheduled to get vaccinated, half one day and half the other. The first half got it, and then they halted distribution of the Johnson and Johnson the next day. It has been reported that the only team in Omaha that was fully vaccinated is Texas. I would imagine that holds true across the country. This wasn't a political stance the players took. The vaccine became available in the middle of the season, and they were doing their best to get it. Focusing on this is doing a disservice to the players. "


Several talk show hosts and their callers sure don't know this. Passing blame on our baseball program yesterday.


It is what it is nowadays unfortunately. Heck some of our own fans are seeing something they are looking for and run away with it being the ultimate truth.

People will find their "truth" and then stick with it. Really sucks we can't just be patient and get the real truth
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a symptom of the social media age were we don't need the facts to share a wrong opinion on something. At this time, there is very little, actual written factual information that is public knowledge.

Outside of the statements from the NCAA and from us (and this is an instance where worrying about privacy concerns is hurting us), the only facts that we know are:

-Someone was sick, was tested, and was positive.

-13 vaccinated players were allowed to play Friday without being tested.

- Those players were subsequently tested and four of them tested positive, resulting in a forced forfeit.

Outside of that, all the info posted by me, anyone else, said by talkshows, tweeted, etc. is all hearsay. Blaming what happened on unvaccinated players simply doesn't have any documented source. We know that someone (Jarrett) was sick. Coach said he was sick after Mondays game. He was tested because he was sick, not because he wasn't vaccinated. If he hadn't been sick, he wouldn't have been tested, regardless of vaccination status. It is entirely possible that he is vaccinated and still became ill. We simply don't know.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
The Gatekeeper.
Homer Dumbarse.
StateFan2001's favorite poster.
James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf80 said:

That's a symptom of the social media age were we don't need the facts to share a wrong opinion on something. At this time, there is very little, actual written factual information that is public knowledge.

Outside of the statements from the NCAA and from us (and this is an instance where worrying about privacy concerns is hurting us), the only facts that we know are:

-Someone was sick, was tested, and was positive.

-13 vaccinated players were allowed to play Friday without being tested.

- Those players were subsequently tested and four of them tested positive, resulting in a forced forfeit.

Outside of that, all the info posted by me, anyone else, said by talkshows, tweeted, etc. is all hearsay. Blaming what happened on unvaccinated players simply doesn't have any documented source. We know that someone (Jarrett) was sick. Coach said he was sick after Mondays game. He was tested because he was sick, not because he wasn't vaccinated. If he hadn't been sick, he wouldn't have been tested, regardless of vaccination status. It is entirely possible that he is vaccinated and still became ill. We simply don't know.
That's not true; unvaccinated players were being tested by the NCAA
Bell Tower Grey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FourOaksWolf said:

wilmwolf80 said:

I know it's hard to keep up with everything with so many threads, but please read my post from the now locked vaccination thread.

"Per information from gooack1979, the whole team was scheduled to get vaccinated, half one day and half the other. The first half got it, and then they halted distribution of the Johnson and Johnson the next day. It has been reported that the only team in Omaha that was fully vaccinated is Texas. I would imagine that holds true across the country. This wasn't a political stance the players took. The vaccine became available in the middle of the season, and they were doing their best to get it. Focusing on this is doing a disservice to the players. "


Several talk show hosts and their callers sure don't know this. Passing blame on our baseball program yesterday.
Yep. We went from sugar to shti pretty quickly on some espn related sports talk shows. Screw'em all.
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Henderson said:

wilmwolf80 said:

That's a symptom of the social media age were we don't need the facts to share a wrong opinion on something. At this time, there is very little, actual written factual information that is public knowledge.

Outside of the statements from the NCAA and from us (and this is an instance where worrying about privacy concerns is hurting us), the only facts that we know are:

-Someone was sick, was tested, and was positive.

-13 vaccinated players were allowed to play Friday without being tested.

- Those players were subsequently tested and four of them tested positive, resulting in a forced forfeit.

Outside of that, all the info posted by me, anyone else, said by talkshows, tweeted, etc. is all hearsay. Blaming what happened on unvaccinated players simply doesn't have any documented source. We know that someone (Jarrett) was sick. Coach said he was sick after Mondays game. He was tested because he was sick, not because he wasn't vaccinated. If he hadn't been sick, he wouldn't have been tested, regardless of vaccination status. It is entirely possible that he is vaccinated and still became ill. We simply don't know.
That's not true; unvaccinated players were being tested by the NCAA


But Jarrett was tested because he had symptoms. If you have information that refutes that, please post it.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
The Gatekeeper.
Homer Dumbarse.
StateFan2001's favorite poster.
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Henderson said:

wilmwolf80 said:

That's a symptom of the social media age were we don't need the facts to share a wrong opinion on something. At this time, there is very little, actual written factual information that is public knowledge.

Outside of the statements from the NCAA and from us (and this is an instance where worrying about privacy concerns is hurting us), the only facts that we know are:

-Someone was sick, was tested, and was positive.

-13 vaccinated players were allowed to play Friday without being tested.

- Those players were subsequently tested and four of them tested positive, resulting in a forced forfeit.

Outside of that, all the info posted by me, anyone else, said by talkshows, tweeted, etc. is all hearsay. Blaming what happened on unvaccinated players simply doesn't have any documented source. We know that someone (Jarrett) was sick. Coach said he was sick after Mondays game. He was tested because he was sick, not because he wasn't vaccinated. If he hadn't been sick, he wouldn't have been tested, regardless of vaccination status. It is entirely possible that he is vaccinated and still became ill. We simply don't know.
That's not true; unvaccinated players were being tested by the NCAA


Jarrett was vaccinated
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And again, continuing to focus on the vaccination status of the players is a disservice to them. We had enough vaccinated players to continue to play, one way or another. Those four positive tests after the Friday game should be the focus.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
The Gatekeeper.
Homer Dumbarse.
StateFan2001's favorite poster.
MaxPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf80 said:

And again, continuing to focus on the vaccination status of the players is a disservice to them. We had enough vaccinated players to continue to play, one way or another. Those four positive tests after the Friday game should be the focus.

That's the way I see it. This is not a vaccination issue. We were sent home because 4 vax players tested positive. This is also not a player or public health issue because if that was the concern the ncaa and Corbin would have wanted to pause everything, test all players on all teams (since even vax players are clearly not protected) and understand what's going on before proceeding with the tournament.

And rules have nothing to do with it. If Corbin can get a field-change on the rule book (presumably for safety reasons) and get additional testing at the last minute, why can't we change the rules for a potentially much more significant safety impact?

The intent of the ncaa policy all along has been to hide any positives that are surely at the CWS. That is the fraud of this entire sorry situation. Our story exposed their fraud. Their 2 am announcement, hiding behind HIPAA/medical boards, fueling the flames of the political debate over vaccination and the fact that it is just NC State was a perfect recipe to make this go away to keep the $$$ intact. Hell, maybe our players and coaches will even buy tickets and stay for the rest of the tournament! All the better!

I'm hoping Corrigan and Woodson are all over the ramifications of this ordeal on the ncaa. The timing is right and there are a lot of schools that should align with us in this one.

If they were truly that concerned about health issues, why were they only concerned about NC State players?
If I were other schools I would be asking why would you compromise our players, coaches and fans by not taking additional measures when vaccinated players were infected?

Either give us our game with vax players after Vandy has tested all of their players or Vandy has to be disqualified immediately.

James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bas2020 said:

James Henderson said:

wilmwolf80 said:

That's a symptom of the social media age were we don't need the facts to share a wrong opinion on something. At this time, there is very little, actual written factual information that is public knowledge.

Outside of the statements from the NCAA and from us (and this is an instance where worrying about privacy concerns is hurting us), the only facts that we know are:

-Someone was sick, was tested, and was positive.

-13 vaccinated players were allowed to play Friday without being tested.

- Those players were subsequently tested and four of them tested positive, resulting in a forced forfeit.

Outside of that, all the info posted by me, anyone else, said by talkshows, tweeted, etc. is all hearsay. Blaming what happened on unvaccinated players simply doesn't have any documented source. We know that someone (Jarrett) was sick. Coach said he was sick after Mondays game. He was tested because he was sick, not because he wasn't vaccinated. If he hadn't been sick, he wouldn't have been tested, regardless of vaccination status. It is entirely possible that he is vaccinated and still became ill. We simply don't know.
That's not true; unvaccinated players were being tested by the NCAA


Jarrett was vaccinated
Unvaxed guys were being tested every other day.
James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf80 said:

James Henderson said:

wilmwolf80 said:

That's a symptom of the social media age were we don't need the facts to share a wrong opinion on something. At this time, there is very little, actual written factual information that is public knowledge.

Outside of the statements from the NCAA and from us (and this is an instance where worrying about privacy concerns is hurting us), the only facts that we know are:

-Someone was sick, was tested, and was positive.

-13 vaccinated players were allowed to play Friday without being tested.

- Those players were subsequently tested and four of them tested positive, resulting in a forced forfeit.

Outside of that, all the info posted by me, anyone else, said by talkshows, tweeted, etc. is all hearsay. Blaming what happened on unvaccinated players simply doesn't have any documented source. We know that someone (Jarrett) was sick. Coach said he was sick after Mondays game. He was tested because he was sick, not because he wasn't vaccinated. If he hadn't been sick, he wouldn't have been tested, regardless of vaccination status. It is entirely possible that he is vaccinated and still became ill. We simply don't know.
That's not true; unvaccinated players were being tested by the NCAA


But Jarrett was tested because he had symptoms. If you have information that refutes that, please post it.
I was told State's regular test day was Thursday, which was when JT tested positive.
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was told Jarrett tested positive Wednesday. I want him to come out and say he was vaccinated so we can just burn this whole stupid narrative.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
The Gatekeeper.
Homer Dumbarse.
StateFan2001's favorite poster.
James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf80 said:

I was told Jarrett tested positive Wednesday. I want him to come out and say he was vaccinated so we can just burn this whole stupid narrative.
I believe Justice did too.
James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think State's test days for unvaxed guys were Tuesday/Thursday/Saturday/Monday.

Makes sense given Vandy tested yesterday and will again on Monday. I'd imagine teams on that side were on same schedule.
kmb717
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Did Giglio delete all his tweets about Corbin from last night?
Wolfpacklife
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfpack1437
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Look, I'm a member over at PP but only bc I've had a membership forever from when James and Steve were the guys.
Regardless of what anyone thinks of them, I applaud them for releasing this article. The Pack getting screwed happens more often than not bc the very few people we have on our side with ability to raise hell, actually do so

https://247sports.com/college/north-carolina-state/Article/NC-State-baseball-College-World-Series-NCAA-dismissal-Vanderbilt-CWS-Elliott-Avent-167089773/
wolfpack1437
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wolfpacklife said:



Funny story about Mr Rogers. He was the seat directly behind me for the UVA elimination game that was delayed for several hours. He was plastered before the game ever got started. He led our section in some cheers during the rain delay. It was quite amusing. Seemed like a nice guy
James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfpack1437 said:

Look, I'm a member over at PP but only bc I've had a membership forever from when James and Steve were the guys.
Regardless of what anyone thinks of them, I applaud them for releasing this article. The Pack getting screwed happens more often than not bc the very few people we have on our side with ability to raise hell, actually do so

https://247sports.com/college/north-carolina-state/Article/NC-State-baseball-College-World-Series-NCAA-dismissal-Vanderbilt-CWS-Elliott-Avent-167089773/
"This decision was made based on the recommendation of the Championship Medical Team and the Douglas County Health Department," the NCAA said in a statement. "As a result, Vanderbilt will advance to the CWS Finals.
"The NCAA and the committee regret that NC State's student-athletes and coaching staff will not be able to continue in the championship in which they earned the right to participate. Because of privacy issues, we cannot provide further details."
Douglas County Health Department spokesman Phil Rooney said the health department did not recommend NC State's removal but told the NCAA the department would support whatever decision the NCAA made.
Rooney said the health department provides assistance to the NCAA in testing and contact tracing but is limited in mandating procedures related to COVID-19 because there is no local directed health measure in effect.

The way I read that is the NCAA made the decision to remove NC State based on the recommendation of the Championship Medical Team AND the Douglas County Health Department.

I didn't read that as if the decision was made by the Douglas County Health Department or solely on what the Douglas County Health Department suggested.

I'd think DC Health gave the NCAA their opinion/houghts and

I don't know what we expected the outcome to be. We had 6 positives and 14 other potential positives pending Saturday testing. What did we think we would happen at that point?

VCU was removed from the NCAAs even though they had over the suggested # of players to play. I pretty much expected the same for State unless the Pack would have been able to play with 13 vaxed players. After those guys were tested (which was within the rules) and 4 came back positive, well they aren't putting known positive players on the field. No one does that.
Bas2020
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Henderson said:

wolfpack1437 said:

Look, I'm a member over at PP but only bc I've had a membership forever from when James and Steve were the guys.
Regardless of what anyone thinks of them, I applaud them for releasing this article. The Pack getting screwed happens more often than not bc the very few people we have on our side with ability to raise hell, actually do so

https://247sports.com/college/north-carolina-state/Article/NC-State-baseball-College-World-Series-NCAA-dismissal-Vanderbilt-CWS-Elliott-Avent-167089773/
"This decision was made based on the recommendation of the Championship Medical Team and the Douglas County Health Department," the NCAA said in a statement. "As a result, Vanderbilt will advance to the CWS Finals.
"The NCAA and the committee regret that NC State's student-athletes and coaching staff will not be able to continue in the championship in which they earned the right to participate. Because of privacy issues, we cannot provide further details."
Douglas County Health Department spokesman Phil Rooney said the health department did not recommend NC State's removal but told the NCAA the department would support whatever decision the NCAA made.
Rooney said the health department provides assistance to the NCAA in testing and contact tracing but is limited in mandating procedures related to COVID-19 because there is no local directed health measure in effect.

The way I read that is the NCAA made the decision to remove NC State based on the recommendation of the Championship Medical Team AND the Douglas County Health Department.

I didn't read that as if the decision was made by the Douglas County Health Department or solely on what the Douglas County Health Department suggested.

I'd think DC Health gave the NCAA their opinion/houghts and

I don't know what we expected the outcome to be. We had 6 positives and 14 other potential positives pending Saturday testing. What did we think we would happen at that point?

VCU was removed from the NCAAs even though they had over the suggested # of players to play. I pretty much expected the same for State unless the Pack would have been able to play with 13 vaxed players. After those guys were tested (which was within the rules) and 4 came back positive, well they aren't putting known positive players on the field. No one does that.


The climate is completely different from March to damn near July . Not sure why the VCU comparison with Empty stands and not all vaccines for elderly or adults were completed back then . And I can guarantee you positive Covid players on other teams have played . Test them all ... vaxxed or not vaxxed if your gonna chose and punish the vaxxed regardless. .
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The outcome I would've liked was the opportunity to verify the validity of those positive tests among vaccinated players. Multiple people way smarter than me have pointed out the flaws of testing vaccinated players with that test. I don't expect unvaccinated people that test positive to be able to play, and I understand why they wouldn't let unvaccinated players play with pending tests. But as I see it one of two things happened, either those tests on the vaccinated players are faulty, or they were exposed to a variant resistant to the vaccine. If it's the latter, and we are all about player safety, then every single player there is at risk and the whole thing should be shut down.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
The Gatekeeper.
Homer Dumbarse.
StateFan2001's favorite poster.
wolfpack1437
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf80 said:

The outcome I would've liked was the opportunity to verify the validity of those positive tests among vaccinated players. Multiple people way smarter than me have pointed out the flaws of testing vaccinated players with that test. I don't expect unvaccinated people that test positive to be able to play, and I understand why they wouldn't let unvaccinated players play with pending tests. But as I see it one of two things happened, either those tests on the vaccinated players are faulty, or they were exposed to a variant resistant to the vaccine. If it's the latter, and we are all about player safety, then every single player there is at risk and the whole thing should be shut down.
I would have liked to see the negative players able to play. Obviously if there is an "incubation period" there's a good chance people aren't contagious during that period. Regardless, it's a socially distanced game being played outside. I would have been fine with any positive tests having to sit out a game
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://d1baseball.com/analysis/nc-states-cws-removal-the-timeline-of-events/

This confirms some things posted here, refutes others. It still doesn't address the positive tests of vaccinated players, and there is no additional information there. That is still the thing that we should be focusing on, as without those tests, we could've still played.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
The Gatekeeper.
Homer Dumbarse.
StateFan2001's favorite poster.
James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
SportManagementEngineer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Henderson said:


Even if true, he's still a ***** and I hope they get their dick kicked in by MSU.
Twitter: @JJwith2Jays
James Henderson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfpack1437 said:

wilmwolf80 said:

The outcome I would've liked was the opportunity to verify the validity of those positive tests among vaccinated players. Multiple people way smarter than me have pointed out the flaws of testing vaccinated players with that test. I don't expect unvaccinated people that test positive to be able to play, and I understand why they wouldn't let unvaccinated players play with pending tests. But as I see it one of two things happened, either those tests on the vaccinated players are faulty, or they were exposed to a variant resistant to the vaccine. If it's the latter, and we are all about player safety, then every single player there is at risk and the whole thing should be shut down.
I would have liked to see the negative players able to play. Obviously if there is an "incubation period" there's a good chance people aren't contagious during that period. Regardless, it's a socially distanced game being played outside. I would have been fine with any positive tests having to sit out a game


Those guys need to be tested more if in contact tracing. It can take up to 7 days I thikk for a positive test.
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Henderson said:

wolfpack1437 said:

wilmwolf80 said:

The outcome I would've liked was the opportunity to verify the validity of those positive tests among vaccinated players. Multiple people way smarter than me have pointed out the flaws of testing vaccinated players with that test. I don't expect unvaccinated people that test positive to be able to play, and I understand why they wouldn't let unvaccinated players play with pending tests. But as I see it one of two things happened, either those tests on the vaccinated players are faulty, or they were exposed to a variant resistant to the vaccine. If it's the latter, and we are all about player safety, then every single player there is at risk and the whole thing should be shut down.
I would have liked to see the negative players able to play. Obviously if there is an "incubation period" there's a good chance people aren't contagious during that period. Regardless, it's a socially distanced game being played outside. I would have been fine with any positive tests having to sit out a game


Those guys need to be tested more if in contact tracing. It can take up to 7 days I thikk for a positive test.


They were presumably all exposed to Jarrett, or wherever he got it from, at around the same time. Incubation period can vary from person to person, but I think it's safe to assume that those that were exposed to it enough to get it would have shown up by now. Jarrett was symptomatic as early as Sunday, and would've been contagious before that. Also, I've been told everyone that came back yesterday was tested today and were negative, but I haven't confirmed that.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
The Gatekeeper.
Homer Dumbarse.
StateFan2001's favorite poster.
wolfpack1437
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Henderson said:

wolfpack1437 said:

wilmwolf80 said:

The outcome I would've liked was the opportunity to verify the validity of those positive tests among vaccinated players. Multiple people way smarter than me have pointed out the flaws of testing vaccinated players with that test. I don't expect unvaccinated people that test positive to be able to play, and I understand why they wouldn't let unvaccinated players play with pending tests. But as I see it one of two things happened, either those tests on the vaccinated players are faulty, or they were exposed to a variant resistant to the vaccine. If it's the latter, and we are all about player safety, then every single player there is at risk and the whole thing should be shut down.
I would have liked to see the negative players able to play. Obviously if there is an "incubation period" there's a good chance people aren't contagious during that period. Regardless, it's a socially distanced game being played outside. I would have been fine with any positive tests having to sit out a game


Those guys need to be tested more if in contact tracing. It can take up to 7 days I thikk for a positive test.
I'm not a Dr but my point is, even if you have contracted it but are testing negative, I would think that means you aren't contagious. If you aren't contagious you should be able to play.
Also, Davie said above that there aren't strains you can catch it from if you are vaccinated (wouldn't that mean they had to be false positives)
wolfpack1437
How long do you want to ignore this user?
James Henderson said:


I guess he didn't talk to Giglio. I heard the same thing as Joe at the game and again afterwards. This could be Corbin saying he wouldn't agree to the DH, a delayed game, or play the game with positives sitting out and just test the team again after the game....who knows
WPNfamily
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfpack1437 said:

James Henderson said:


I guess he didn't talk to Giglio. I heard the same thing as Joe at the game and again afterwards. This could be Corbin saying he wouldn't agree to the DH, a delayed game, or play the game with positives sitting out and just test the team again after the game....who knows
From a Vandy booster, that corroborates a state source, Corbin absolutely would not agree to any more delay because Rocker had started his warm up at 2pm.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.