What could they be reviewing?
SniderFC said:
What could they be reviewing?
Colonel Armstrong said:
100% offsides and impacted the play. Not sure how that wasn't overturned other than the ref didn't want to make a big call
Wlfpk81 said:
What is the reason for no offside, because he re-established himself? Confusing call but what a game that was!
ChemE94 said:
It's ok to just say the better team won tonight. It doesn't diminish a great season…
Packisback09 said:Wlfpk81 said:
What is the reason for no offside, because he re-established himself? Confusing call but what a game that was!
Basically decided the offsides player didn't impact the play when he came back into an onsides position. If our defender tried to fight through him more it would have been easier to call it back.
ChemE94 said:
It's ok to just say the better team won tonight. It doesn't diminish a great season…
flylike44 said:ChemE94 said:
It's ok to just say the better team won tonight. It doesn't diminish a great season…
Off
It was a clear offside. And you also missed the post above where I did the opposite of diminishing a great season lol.
ChemE94 said:flylike44 said:ChemE94 said:
It's ok to just say the better team won tonight. It doesn't diminish a great season…
Off
It was a clear offside. And you also missed the post above where I did the opposite of diminishing a great season lol.
Hard to argue that they gained an advantage from it. If things had been reversed we would be saying that was a great goal. Ref didn't cost us that game with the no call - it was a goal.
Wufpack17 said:
Explain to me how the offsides player didn't affect the play when he is the one who started the sequence??