chaser said:
From the cheap seats, it looks like Keatts could use more bench coaching help. He's extremely slow to change his style in obvious situations and perhaps his lack of a system is a system to the more experienced coaching observers. Would love to have that Lutz type coach to help with some in game changes like maybe a zone even when we are not in foul trouble. And maybe draw up an in bounds play. And passing the ball more. These are things that happen in every game regardless of the opponent.
Hoping this weight off the team's recruiting back leads to getting more of the 4 stars that are closer to 5 stars than 3.
Thank you for actually offering up some examples to back up your opinion, I appreciate that. While I disagree that he doesn't have a system (IMO, he does) I can see how those that prefer a different style think that way. It's not necessarily what I prefer but I'm not a basketball junky with strong opinions either way (well, except for the pack line D. no thx! haha).
James Johnson is that Lutz type but I definitely understand wanting to upgrade there, I get it. As for the zone, some coaches just aren't zone guys. I don't understand it but it's just a different philosophy to some. I guess the thought is that why play it if you don't practice it enough to be "good" at it.
I think Keatts is a "good" coach. I think he and his staff do a really good job of coaching up the kids they bring in. We've seen it. If he can bring in 4 stars (50-100 range) that are good fits for his system (ex. Terquavion, Seabron) then I think we can win some games. Getting a commitment from Dillingham should be a good start as we're led to believe that other really good kids want to play with him. They just need to go ahead and commit as well. ha
If he can continue to grow as a coach, maybe tweak the staff a bit I think he'll be fine. I just don't want to get into the hiring/firing game every 5 or 6 years (and I love a coaching search)
Anyways, appreciate the debate.