I wonder if this was a "professional job", and not some random Joe Libtard Commie.
https://instagr.am/p/DOcW3ssCE8V
Werewolf said:
"we are killing each other for just a basic difference of opinion."
who is the "we" from the MAGA side?
Wufpack17 said:Werewolf said:
"we are killing each other for just a basic difference of opinion."
who is the "we" from the MAGA side?
this is the perfect example of what's wrong. There shouldn't be sides.
.@patrickbetdavid has a chilling theory about who may be behind Charlie Kirk’s murder—and why.
— Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) September 11, 2025
“If in the next week an opposing person from the left gets assassinated, you have to know this is happening from an outside source—a different country that wants to see America have a… pic.twitter.com/TdWqWdGsJn
The left is now celebrating Charlie Kirk‘s brutal murder.
— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) September 10, 2025
We are all Charlie Kirk now.. pic.twitter.com/UikvM3iqGR
packgrad said:packofwolves said:
Disgusting and inexcusable, the Dem party in Congress.Democratic Members of Congress have just objected for a prayer to be said out loud for Charlie Kirk.
— Ian Jaeger (@IanJaeger29) September 10, 2025
This is evil.
pic.twitter.com/Q5qPVlALIU
It's who they are. Look no further than the POS smapty's posts on this topic since it happened. Garbage.
IseWolf22 said:
Shocking and awful news. Political violence has no place in a civilized society. Prayers for his family and I hope the murder is caught
SmaptyWolf said:Werewolf said:
Catch us up on the names of Liberal political figures who have been assassinated or had assassination attempts upon them. Asking for a friend
A whopping three months ago the Dem Minnesota House Speaker and her husband were politically assassinated. It was touching how the Water Cooler came together to condemn the violence.
Just kidding, you guys were monsters as usual.
SmaptyWolf said:Werewolf said:
Catch us up on the names of Liberal political figures who have been assassinated or had assassination attempts upon them. Asking for a friend
A whopping three months ago the Dem Minnesota House Speaker and her husband were politically assassinated. It was touching how the Water Cooler came together to condemn the violence.
Just kidding, you guys were monsters as usual.
TheStorm said:
Couldn't even bring himself to type the word "assassin"... tries to type the word "murderer" instead.
SMH.
Just another Civ clone. Never matters what happens as long as it doesn't directly affect them.
You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 27, 2016
TheStorm said:packgrad said:packofwolves said:
Disgusting and inexcusable, the Dem party in Congress.Democratic Members of Congress have just objected for a prayer to be said out loud for Charlie Kirk.
— Ian Jaeger (@IanJaeger29) September 10, 2025
This is evil.
pic.twitter.com/Q5qPVlALIU
It's who they are. Look no further than the POS smapty's posts on this topic since it happened. Garbage.
I'm not sure who's worse. Smarpty or GP.
They are both equally disgusting as far as I am concerned.
caryking said:You can tell a lot about a person by how they react when someone dies.
— Charlie Kirk (@charliekirk11) November 27, 2016
caryking said:SmaptyWolf said:Werewolf said:
Catch us up on the names of Liberal political figures who have been assassinated or had assassination attempts upon them. Asking for a friend
A whopping three months ago the Dem Minnesota House Speaker and her husband were politically assassinated. It was touching how the Water Cooler came together to condemn the violence.
Just kidding, you guys were monsters as usual.
Two things:
1) the perpetrator was a left winged nut job
2) the profile of those people didn't rise to the level of Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk was a person of significant importance in our country and across the world. He was invited, many times to debate the students at great universities, like Cambridge. Unfortunately, your example does not measure up to this one. That said, yes, the Minnesota Speaker and Husband's killing were extremely tragic. No doubt about that. It's sad when anyone is senselessly murdered.
Glasswolf said:caryking said:SmaptyWolf said:Werewolf said:
Catch us up on the names of Liberal political figures who have been assassinated or had assassination attempts upon them. Asking for a friend
A whopping three months ago the Dem Minnesota House Speaker and her husband were politically assassinated. It was touching how the Water Cooler came together to condemn the violence.
Just kidding, you guys were monsters as usual.
Two things:
1) the perpetrator was a left winged nut job
2) the profile of those people didn't rise to the level of Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk was a person of significant importance in our country and across the world. He was invited, many times to debate the students at great universities, like Cambridge. Unfortunately, your example does not measure up to this one. That said, yes, the Minnesota Speaker and Husband's killing were extremely tragic. No doubt about that. It's sad when anyone is senselessly murdered.
Vance Boelter, the man accused of killing DFL House leader Melissa Hortman and her husband and shooting and injuring DFL Sen. John Hoffman and his wife, voted in the March 2024 Minnesota Republican presidential primary, belying online disinformation that has sought to paint Boelter as a leftist with ties to Gov. Tim Walz.
The Reformer obtained a screenshot of Boelter's voter profile in the GOP Data Center a national database with voter registration information used to target voters from a source with access to it, which confirms other reporting about Boelter's support for President Donald Trump.
this is where we have a fundamental disagreement. A political party didn't assassinate Charlie Kirk, One individual out of 340 million people did, for a political reason. Neither party has a platform of assassination of people they disagree with.Gulfstream4 said:TheStorm said:
Couldn't even bring himself to type the word "assassin"... tries to type the word "murderer" instead.
SMH.
Just another Civ clone. Never matters what happens as long as it doesn't directly affect them.
It's hard for decent people (which I believe Civ and Ise are) to admit they are part of the problem. But when one votes for the democrats you vote for it all, not just the parts you like.
It's clear to everyone the democrat party has taken a hard left turn over the last decade. Again, this is unpleasant for some of their supporters to acknowledge.
hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:TheStorm said:
Couldn't even bring himself to type the word "assassin"... tries to type the word "murderer" instead.
SMH.
Just another Civ clone. Never matters what happens as long as it doesn't directly affect them.
It's hard for decent people (which I believe Civ and Ise are) to admit they are part of the problem. But when one votes for the democrats you vote for it all, not just the parts you like.
It's clear to everyone the democrat party has taken a hard left turn over the last decade. Again, this is unpleasant for some of their supporters to acknowledge.
this is where we have a fundamental disagreement. A political party didn't assassinate Charlie Kirk, One individual out of 340 million people did, for a political reason. Neither party has a platform of assassination of people they disagree with.
My hope, is that this will give Charlies work an even bigger platform, to see how he met folks he disagreed with in the town square and had a respectful debate. He didn't blame, he didn't name call, he met people who hated him because of who he was and respected them. He threw no stones. I think any person who interacted with him in his video left a better person than what they were. That's his legacy.
If this event changes the road we all seem to be going down with respect to the vitriol in politics, that would be the greatest honor we can give Charlie Kirk's work.
Did I agree 100% with Charlie Kirk? No, but I believed in the way he delivered his message and how he carried himself 1000%
caryking said:SmaptyWolf said:Werewolf said:
Catch us up on the names of Liberal political figures who have been assassinated or had assassination attempts upon them. Asking for a friend
A whopping three months ago the Dem Minnesota House Speaker and her husband were politically assassinated. It was touching how the Water Cooler came together to condemn the violence.
Just kidding, you guys were monsters as usual.
Two things:
1) the perpetrator was a left winged nut job
2) the profile of those people didn't rise to the level of Charlie Kirk
Charlie Kirk was a person of significant importance in our country and across the world. He was invited, many times to debate the students at great universities, like Cambridge. Unfortunately, your example does not measure up to this one. That said, yes, the Minnesota Speaker and Husband's killing were extremely tragic. No doubt about that. It's sad when anyone is senselessly murdered.
sorry but I've never said any of that. You can't lump 1/2 the country into the stupidity of 1% of the loudest.jkpackfan said:hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:TheStorm said:
Couldn't even bring himself to type the word "assassin"... tries to type the word "murderer" instead.
SMH.
Just another Civ clone. Never matters what happens as long as it doesn't directly affect them.
It's hard for decent people (which I believe Civ and Ise are) to admit they are part of the problem. But when one votes for the democrats you vote for it all, not just the parts you like.
It's clear to everyone the democrat party has taken a hard left turn over the last decade. Again, this is unpleasant for some of their supporters to acknowledge.
this is where we have a fundamental disagreement. A political party didn't assassinate Charlie Kirk, One individual out of 340 million people did, for a political reason. Neither party has a platform of assassination of people they disagree with.
My hope, is that this will give Charlies work an even bigger platform, to see how he met folks he disagreed with in the town square and had a respectful debate. He didn't blame, he didn't name call, he met people who hated him because of who he was and respected them. He threw no stones. I think any person who interacted with him in his video left a better person than what they were. That's his legacy.
If this event changes the road we all seem to be going down with respect to the vitriol in politics, that would be the greatest honor we can give Charlie Kirk's work.
Did I agree 100% with Charlie Kirk? No, but I believed in the way he delivered his message and how he carried himself 1000%
Like I said above you guys have called Trump and maga nazis and fascists for years just for thinking differently than you so I respectfully disagree.
hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:TheStorm said:
Couldn't even bring himself to type the word "assassin"... tries to type the word "murderer" instead.
SMH.
Just another Civ clone. Never matters what happens as long as it doesn't directly affect them.
It's hard for decent people (which I believe Civ and Ise are) to admit they are part of the problem. But when one votes for the democrats you vote for it all, not just the parts you like.
It's clear to everyone the democrat party has taken a hard left turn over the last decade. Again, this is unpleasant for some of their supporters to acknowledge.
this is where we have a fundamental disagreement. A political party didn't assassinate Charlie Kirk, One individual out of 340 million people did, for a political reason. Neither party has a platform of assassination of people they disagree with.
My hope, is that this will give Charlies work an even bigger platform, to see how he met folks he disagreed with in the town square and had a respectful debate. He didn't blame, he didn't name call, he met people who hated him because of who he was and respected them. He threw no stones. I think any person who interacted with him in his video left a better person than what they were. That's his legacy.
If this event changes the road we all seem to be going down with respect to the vitriol in politics, that would be the greatest honor we can give Charlie Kirk's work.
Did I agree 100% with Charlie Kirk? No, but I believed in the way he delivered his message and how he carried himself 1000%
hokiewolf said:this is where we have a fundamental disagreement. A political party didn't assassinate Charlie Kirk, One individual out of 340 million people did, for a political reason. Neither party has a platform of assassination of people they disagree with.Gulfstream4 said:TheStorm said:
Couldn't even bring himself to type the word "assassin"... tries to type the word "murderer" instead.
SMH.
Just another Civ clone. Never matters what happens as long as it doesn't directly affect them.
It's hard for decent people (which I believe Civ and Ise are) to admit they are part of the problem. But when one votes for the democrats you vote for it all, not just the parts you like.
It's clear to everyone the democrat party has taken a hard left turn over the last decade. Again, this is unpleasant for some of their supporters to acknowledge.
My hope, is that this will give Charlies work an even bigger platform, to see how he met folks he disagreed with in the town square and had a respectful debate. He didn't blame, he didn't name call, he met people who hated him because of who he was and respected them. He threw no stones. I think any person who interacted with him in his video left a better person than what they were. That's his legacy.
If this event changes the road we all seem to be going down with respect to the vitriol in politics, that would be the greatest honor we can give Charlie Kirk's work.
Did I agree 100% with Charlie Kirk? No, but I believed in the way he delivered his message and how he carried himself 1000%
you are convicting 1/2 the country for the stupid rhetoric of 1%. I just find that fundamentally a bad faith approach to your fellow AmericansCloudPack said:hokiewolf said:this is where we have a fundamental disagreement. A political party didn't assassinate Charlie Kirk, One individual out of 340 million people did, for a political reason. Neither party has a platform of assassination of people they disagree with.Gulfstream4 said:TheStorm said:
Couldn't even bring himself to type the word "assassin"... tries to type the word "murderer" instead.
SMH.
Just another Civ clone. Never matters what happens as long as it doesn't directly affect them.
It's hard for decent people (which I believe Civ and Ise are) to admit they are part of the problem. But when one votes for the democrats you vote for it all, not just the parts you like.
It's clear to everyone the democrat party has taken a hard left turn over the last decade. Again, this is unpleasant for some of their supporters to acknowledge.
My hope, is that this will give Charlies work an even bigger platform, to see how he met folks he disagreed with in the town square and had a respectful debate. He didn't blame, he didn't name call, he met people who hated him because of who he was and respected them. He threw no stones. I think any person who interacted with him in his video left a better person than what they were. That's his legacy.
If this event changes the road we all seem to be going down with respect to the vitriol in politics, that would be the greatest honor we can give Charlie Kirk's work.
Did I agree 100% with Charlie Kirk? No, but I believed in the way he delivered his message and how he carried himself 1000%
One person pulled the trigger but when you have ppl on MSNBC saying he had it coming and many on social media celebrating, it ain't a great look.