Oldsouljer said:Gulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:hokiewolf said:Gulfstream4 said:eljefe444 said:Gulfstream4 said:SmaptyWolf said:
I'd like to meet the person parked in the Bronx who wouldn't tear off the second two masked a**holes in civilian clothes ran up to their car with guns drawn.
Between this crap and public executions there is something seriously wrong with MAGA people. This is the country they want.
https://www.dhs.gov/news/2026/10/09/dhs-debunks-new-york-sanctuary-politicians-lies-about-ice-shooting-illegal-alien
Bengal illegally entered the United States at an unknown date and location. This criminal illegal alien was previously arrested by the New York Police Department (NYPD) on December 7, 2023, but was RELEASED into the community a few days later by reckless Democrat sanctuary policies that put American lives at risk.
- - -
Between illegals committing crimes and democrats releasing these same criminals back on to the streets, there is something seriously wrong with libtards. This is the country they want.
They fired into the back of a car with a 5 year old… who witnessed his father being shot with a bullet whizzing by his own head on a street with multiple other cars and pedestrians. Thank God nobody else (in this incident) was hurt by these untrained *******s like Cuni, the one standing with his rifle in the air after the arrest, who has a history of unlawful arrests and excessive force. At what point does "Man in the Arena" become a roid rage thug looking for violence?
Not sure if it's just your stated purpose of caring about nothing but liberal tears or you're just too dense to understand the point that ICE shouldn't put others in danger and stomp over fourth amendment rights. Nobody is arguing this man shouldn't have been detained.
https://www.wired.com/story/ice-agent-at-nyc-shooting-has-history-of-alleged-violence-and-illegal-arrests/
What if democrats had kept him in jail when he was arrested the first time and not released him on the streets? None of this would have happened, would it?
Are you too dense to understand this?
two wrongs make it justified is a solid argument.
Sanctuary cities releasing criminals back on the street has a direct effect. Absolutely NONE of this would have happened if he were kept in jail and handed over to ICE. Why is that hard for you to understand?
do you think ICE should have planned better so they didn't kill someone with a 5 year old in the car?
What the hell are you talking about?
I believe he had his kid in the car when they tried to arrest him. Maybe don't do that.
So don't arrest violent criminals because they have a kid with them?
And who got killed?
uhhhh yes. Plan your arrest to minimize risk. More often then not what has been seen by the public show a lack of give a ****
Even the mafia didn't do hits when the target was with his family. Geez man
The guy has fled arrest before. He has a rap sheet long as your arm. He tried to flee again with a kid in the back seat. He crashed in two different vehicles with a kid in the back seat. He then drove at ICE officers with a kid in the back seat. But in your mind ICE was wrong because he had a kid in the back seat? Are you drunk?
Again, none of this would have happened if he were kept in jail and then handed over to ICE. Where is your outrage with that? Why do you not rail against the release of a criminal in the first place?
yes ICE is at fault when an arrest doesn't go smoothly. You know why? Because they're the ones carrying out the plan.
Sanctuary cities releasing criminal immigrants are a reality we can't wish away. So you deal in that reality when you're planning your arrest
Like I said, the mafia planned better
You are okay sanctuary cities creating this mess to start with and you are okay with a violent criminal putting his kid and multiple law enforcement officers at risk but ICE needs to do better?
I don't understand where people like you come from.
They defend the indefensible, you don't have to do that so don't put your self in the position of defending what doesn't need defending.
The indefensible… release the Epstein files. Why do Pubs defend them?
