caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

From the world wide webs:

The following agreements were negotiated and took effect (or were renegotiated) within the last ~25 years:
1. AustraliaUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2005)
2. BahrainUnited States FTA signed 2005 (effective 2006)
3. Dominican RepublicCentral AmericaU.S. FTA (CAFTA-DR) signed 2004 (effective 2006) with Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic
4. ChileUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
5. ColombiaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2012)
6. JordanUnited States FTA signed 2000 (effective December 2001) (on the edge of the 25-year window but typically counted here)
7. MoroccoUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2009)
8. OmanUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2006)
9. PanamaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2007 (effective 2012)
10. PeruUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2009)
11. SingaporeUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
12. United StatesKorea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) signed 2007 (effective 2012)
13. United StatesMexicoCanada Agreement (USMCA) renegotiated and signed 2018 (effective 2020), replacing NAFTA (originally 1994)

So ~13 FTAs have been put into force by the United States over the past 25 years. These cover trade liberalization with about 20 partner countries in total.

---

Now, go read each one of those FTA's details and the actual execution and find out of these FTA's were truly what you think are FTA's.

Actually, define, in your belief what a FTA actually is, then research the actual FTA's you posted.

For me, FTA means unfettered free trade including business access for companies.

---

yeah, I'm not going to complete a book report for you. I answered your question. There are countries that dropped their tariffs to 0 and Trump still tariffs them.

---

Actually, you answered my question from an uninformed position. Trade is not only about what you think it is. Trade also includes business activity within a country. Foreign companies have had unfettered access into the US forever. The same can't always be said for US companies.

---

I would disagree with that statement but fine. How many of these tariffs provide US Companies unfettered access to other countries? How many have been ratified by Congress?

How has the government owning a portion of US Steel provided it with more foreign customers?

---

Hokie, you just moved the goal post...

My point was: A free trade agreement, in the context of free trade, should include unfettered access for US companies to operate freely within another country. You certainly know that Foreign companies operate within the US, right?

So, by you asking about tarrif's giving access to US companies is dumb. My point is that the tariff's have been enacted for a number of reasons, including closing (or partially) off access for US companies.

Congress hasn't ratified any of these, to my knowledge through direct legislation. That said, the power, to be ruled on by the Supreme Court is going to be based on laws previously passed, by congress, and signed by some President.

Now, the government taking a position in any business is not ideal, in fact I completely disagree with it. Didn't a foreign based company buy US Steel? If so, that's unfettered access, right?

---

In an ideal scenario, yes. But these FTAs have all kinds of different negotiating points that favor both parties.

Point is y'all asked if there were FTAs, there are. I'm sure in some instances there are100% free trade agreements in these treaties. Maybe I misunderstood your stance.

Sure, the Japanese company now has unfettered access to the US market because US Steel was over protected by tariffs and poorly managed. Now it's better managed, but the US Govt now dictates how they can operate (ie which plants to keep open or close for political expedience rather than economic reasons) and therefore the prices remain high without competition

***Chef's kiss***

"One of the contracts, for bulk steel, sat on Noem's desk for approval for so long that from the time the deal was struck in December until it was signed Feb. 10, the price of steel went up more than $100 million, some of the people said. A senior administration official said Noem blamed Scott for the wall's delay in a conversation with Trump earlier this year. "

The Coast Guard pilot who left Noem’s blanket behind was initially fired and told to take a commercial flight home when they reached their destination

They eventually reinstated the pilot because no one else was available to fly them home https://t.co/xk1oaF5MVO

— Jonathan Lemire (@JonLemire) February 13, 2026

Tariffs on Penguins was the only strategy I agreed with.

IseWolf22 said:

---

caryking said:

---

IseWolf22 said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

From the world wide webs:

The following agreements were negotiated and took effect (or were renegotiated) within the last ~25 years:
1. AustraliaUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2005)
2. BahrainUnited States FTA signed 2005 (effective 2006)
3. Dominican RepublicCentral AmericaU.S. FTA (CAFTA-DR) signed 2004 (effective 2006) with Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic
4. ChileUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
5. ColombiaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2012)
6. JordanUnited States FTA signed 2000 (effective December 2001) (on the edge of the 25-year window but typically counted here)
7. MoroccoUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2009)
8. OmanUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2006)
9. PanamaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2007 (effective 2012)
10. PeruUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2009)
11. SingaporeUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
12. United StatesKorea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) signed 2007 (effective 2012)
13. United StatesMexicoCanada Agreement (USMCA) renegotiated and signed 2018 (effective 2020), replacing NAFTA (originally 1994)

So ~13 FTAs have been put into force by the United States over the past 25 years. These cover trade liberalization with about 20 partner countries in total.

---

Now, go read each one of those FTA's details and the actual execution and find out of these FTA's were truly what you think are FTA's.

Actually, define, in your belief what a FTA actually is, then research the actual FTA's you posted.

For me, FTA means unfettered free trade including business access for companies.

---

yeah, I'm not going to complete a book report for you. I answered your question. There are countries that dropped their tariffs to 0 and Trump still tariffs them.

---

Actually, you answered my question from an uninformed position. Trade is not only about what you think it is. Trade also includes business activity within a country. Foreign companies have had unfettered access into the US forever. The same can't always be said for US companies.

---

These are all deals we made and they were mutually beneficial. The USMCA was literally negotiated by Trump. We've tariffed counties that we have a trade surplus with. We insist on tariffs for countries volunteering to drop theirs.. we put tariffs on an uninhabited island full of penguins.

No one in this administration is actually arguing this is a stick to get to mutual free trade. It's been used illegally as leverage for a whole host of other reasons

---

Curious, where did you get your Law Degree? Which court do you currently sit on to provide your judgement?

---

I can cite numerous lawyers who would argue this is an illegal use of tariff power. It's with the Supreme Court so obviously plenty of legal experts agree with me.

Trump is citing emergency powers. What emergency is caused by the Swiss president taking a tone he did not like? What emergency caused him to rip up his own free trade agreement? What emergency requires us to tariff penguins?

---

I'm sure you can. Guess what, so can I…

I'm not the one sitting here saying they are illegal. You are! My position is very simple…. Presidents enact a number of EO's that may or may not be within their purview. Like Civ always says, the courts will decide this.

In the meantime, I support these actions 100%. If they get overruled, then try something different. Heck, if it were Biden he would go back to the well with the same illegal act. Remember student loan forgiveness. Didn't a court rule on that; yet, he did it again…

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

From the world wide webs:

The following agreements were negotiated and took effect (or were renegotiated) within the last ~25 years:
1. AustraliaUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2005)
2. BahrainUnited States FTA signed 2005 (effective 2006)
3. Dominican RepublicCentral AmericaU.S. FTA (CAFTA-DR) signed 2004 (effective 2006) with Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic
4. ChileUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
5. ColombiaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2012)
6. JordanUnited States FTA signed 2000 (effective December 2001) (on the edge of the 25-year window but typically counted here)
7. MoroccoUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2009)
8. OmanUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2006)
9. PanamaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2007 (effective 2012)
10. PeruUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2009)
11. SingaporeUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
12. United StatesKorea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) signed 2007 (effective 2012)
13. United StatesMexicoCanada Agreement (USMCA) renegotiated and signed 2018 (effective 2020), replacing NAFTA (originally 1994)

So ~13 FTAs have been put into force by the United States over the past 25 years. These cover trade liberalization with about 20 partner countries in total.

---

Now, go read each one of those FTA's details and the actual execution and find out of these FTA's were truly what you think are FTA's.

Actually, define, in your belief what a FTA actually is, then research the actual FTA's you posted.

For me, FTA means unfettered free trade including business access for companies.

---

yeah, I'm not going to complete a book report for you. I answered your question. There are countries that dropped their tariffs to 0 and Trump still tariffs them.

---

Actually, you answered my question from an uninformed position. Trade is not only about what you think it is. Trade also includes business activity within a country. Foreign companies have had unfettered access into the US forever. The same can't always be said for US companies.

---

I would disagree with that statement but fine. How many of these tariffs provide US Companies unfettered access to other countries? How many have been ratified by Congress?

How has the government owning a portion of US Steel provided it with more foreign customers?

---

Hokie, you just moved the goal post...

My point was: A free trade agreement, in the context of free trade, should include unfettered access for US companies to operate freely within another country. You certainly know that Foreign companies operate within the US, right?

So, by you asking about tarrif's giving access to US companies is dumb. My point is that the tariff's have been enacted for a number of reasons, including closing (or partially) off access for US companies.

Congress hasn't ratified any of these, to my knowledge through direct legislation. That said, the power, to be ruled on by the Supreme Court is going to be based on laws previously passed, by congress, and signed by some President.

Now, the government taking a position in any business is not ideal, in fact I completely disagree with it. Didn't a foreign based company buy US Steel? If so, that's unfettered access, right?

---

In an ideal scenario, yes. But these FTAs have all kinds of different negotiating points that favor both parties.

Point is y'all asked if there were FTAs, there are. I'm sure in some instances there are100% free trade agreements in these treaties. Maybe I misunderstood your stance.

Sure, the Japanese company now has unfettered access to the US market because US Steel was over protected by tariffs and poorly managed. Now it's better managed, but the US Govt now dictates how they can operate (ie which plants to keep open or close for political expedience rather than economic reasons) and therefore the prices remain high without competition

---

Again, you've started that we have 100% free trade. I didn't! I said that we didn't have any. As I suggested earlier (which you called a book report, I think) research the reality of these FTA's. Even the USMC was flawed! Trump recognized it and said enough. His argument with Mexico was about buttoning up their border and stop illegal immigration and the drugs that comes through. Whether that is continuing to happen, I don't know.

US Steel was over-regulated and was presented with an unfair trade practice. It just that simple! The only people continuing to buy from US Steel, prior to the sale, was probably government agencies because of contract mandates (another mandate).

it's the same thing in pharmaceuticals. One of my closest friends has been in the industry for a long time. He is sickened by the industry and cartel like behavior that goes on. As he said, it's not only about the pharma company, even though it's bad, it's about European and US GPO's controlling too much kick-back money that just drive up cost without a real value add in the supply chain.

hokiewolf said:

---

Tariffs on Penguins was the only strategy I agreed with.

---

At least put a smiley face on a post that laughable…

packgrad said:

---

Supreme Court needs to do the right thing on 2/20 to keep this train a running. Let the TDS boys cry and wish for failure while the train keeps on rolling.

Year one of Trump has been incredible. Consider: 4.4% GDP at end of year, 2.4% inflation, record high stock market, lowest murder rate since 1900, most secure border in history, & 10% decline in government employees. It’s honestly extraordinary.

— Clay Travis (@ClayTravis) February 13, 2026

---

All of that was done WITH the 46 day Schumer shutdown and it's also why the democrats wanted to shutdown down the government again. They literally offer nothing to the American people but GET TRUMP.

caryking said:

---

IseWolf22 said:

---

caryking said:

---

IseWolf22 said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

caryking said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

From the world wide webs:

The following agreements were negotiated and took effect (or were renegotiated) within the last ~25 years:
1. AustraliaUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2005)
2. BahrainUnited States FTA signed 2005 (effective 2006)
3. Dominican RepublicCentral AmericaU.S. FTA (CAFTA-DR) signed 2004 (effective 2006) with Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Dominican Republic
4. ChileUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
5. ColombiaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2012)
6. JordanUnited States FTA signed 2000 (effective December 2001) (on the edge of the 25-year window but typically counted here)
7. MoroccoUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2009)
8. OmanUnited States FTA signed 2004 (effective 2006)
9. PanamaUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2007 (effective 2012)
10. PeruUnited States Trade Promotion Agreement signed 2006 (effective 2009)
11. SingaporeUnited States FTA signed 2003 (effective 2004)
12. United StatesKorea Free Trade Agreement (KORUS) signed 2007 (effective 2012)
13. United StatesMexicoCanada Agreement (USMCA) renegotiated and signed 2018 (effective 2020), replacing NAFTA (originally 1994)

So ~13 FTAs have been put into force by the United States over the past 25 years. These cover trade liberalization with about 20 partner countries in total.

---

Now, go read each one of those FTA's details and the actual execution and find out of these FTA's were truly what you think are FTA's.

Actually, define, in your belief what a FTA actually is, then research the actual FTA's you posted.

For me, FTA means unfettered free trade including business access for companies.

---

yeah, I'm not going to complete a book report for you. I answered your question. There are countries that dropped their tariffs to 0 and Trump still tariffs them.

---

Actually, you answered my question from an uninformed position. Trade is not only about what you think it is. Trade also includes business activity within a country. Foreign companies have had unfettered access into the US forever. The same can't always be said for US companies.

---

These are all deals we made and they were mutually beneficial. The USMCA was literally negotiated by Trump. We've tariffed counties that we have a trade surplus with. We insist on tariffs for countries volunteering to drop theirs.. we put tariffs on an uninhabited island full of penguins.

No one in this administration is actually arguing this is a stick to get to mutual free trade. It's been used illegally as leverage for a whole host of other reasons

---

Curious, where did you get your Law Degree? Which court do you currently sit on to provide your judgement?

---

I can cite numerous lawyers who would argue this is an illegal use of tariff power. It's with the Supreme Court so obviously plenty of legal experts agree with me.

Trump is citing emergency powers. What emergency is caused by the Swiss president taking a tone he did not like? What emergency caused him to rip up his own free trade agreement? What emergency requires us to tariff penguins?

---

I'm sure you can. Guess what, so can I…

I'm not the one sitting here saying they are illegal. You are! My position is very simple…. Presidents enact a number of EO's that may or may not be within their purview. Like Civ always says, the courts will decide this.

In the meantime, I support these actions 100%. If they get overruled, then try something different. Heck, if it were Biden he would go back to the well with the same illegal act. Remember student loan forgiveness. Didn't a court rule on that; yet, he did it again…

---

Expert legal opinion is heavily on the side of this use of tariffs being illegal. All independent analysis of the arguments on both side will acknowledge the majority opinion is against. All lower courts have gone against Trump.

https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/LSB11332?utm_source=chatgpt.com

Of course you support it. You believe in protectionism for some reasons and consume a media diet the validates your priors. Yes Biden's attempt at student loan forgiveness was also illegal and it was correct for the courts to shut it down. I'm glad they did.

The Zombies..........LOL.......dont' want to think about it. Outta sight, outta pea-brain mind.

You can't handle the truth.

The U.S. Department of Justice released the files under the 2025 Epstein Files Transparency Act, including over 2,000 videos, 180,000 images, and tips from Epstein's sex-trafficking cases, Maxwell's prosecution, and his 2019 death probe. Kathryn Ruemmler resigned from Goldman Sachs on February 12 after emails surfaced showing her friendly ties to Epstein, like calling him 'Uncle Jeffrey' and accepting gifts. Rumors linking billionaire Leon Black's firm Lifetouch to the files caused school photo session postponements in Texas, Utah, and New Jersey districts, though the company denied any involvement. Bipartisan lawmakers accused the DOJ of surveillance after AG Pam Bondi revealed a congresswoman's file searches, while tips ranged from unverified claims to details like Epstein's large sulfuric acid order.

This is Leon Black. He is one of the billionaire pedophiles in the Epstein files.

He owns Lifetouch: The biggest school picture company in America that photographs millions of kids each year.

Your childrens’ photos are being uploaded to a database that’s owned by a pedophile. pic.twitter.com/WVoXJkBA1p

— Power to the People ☭🕊 (@ProudSocialist) February 13, 2026

CONFIRMED: Epstein trained as a spy under Israeli Prime Minister as per unclassified FBI CHS report. pic.twitter.com/PP9qtlgpAD

— illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) February 13, 2026

I've posted before that I think Trump won 46-48 of the states in 2020, and he won California.

Georgia’s VoterGA Election Watchdog Group says Fulton County has 17,852 (mostly Biden) votes that have NO BALLOTS.

This is enough to FLIP the state to TRUMP. This is huge news to finally set the record straight about the stolen 2020 election.

Center in Georgia, a facility… pic.twitter.com/IZ7AtbKUam

— The SCIF (@TheSCIF) February 11, 2026

Conspiracy Theorists were/are right about everything - this list could be 20x longer. pic.twitter.com/oflnmjiMkK

— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) January 28, 2025

Who has worked the hardest attacking Trump?

a) Main Stream Media
b) Hollywood
c) Socia Media Giants - Facebook, Snapchat, etc
d) Google & Youtube
e) Global Elite, World Economic Forum
f) City of London within the City of London

Conspiracy Theorists are 10/10

10 years ago they would’ve said this guy is crazy. https://t.co/Y9htaEN9JK

— 𝐏𝐲𝐫𝐨 𝐑𝐞𝐝 (@itspyrored) February 11, 2026

It is pathetic. Granted there is much conflicting info and certainly will be plenty of AI generated content.

When anons became aware over 10 years ago, they shouted on the rooftops. They were banned, ridiculed and called conspiracy theorists.

Welcome to the party

Q https://t.co/cZjg46ePTf

— BeeGee (@zergneb) February 8, 2026

Scott Jennings with 3 screaming over him. When Trump's EO re voting reqmts goes into effect, be ready for all he$$ to break lose. It's the end of the Deep State as we know it when the real vote is counted.

“76% of black voters think we should show an ID to vote, 80% of Hispanic voters, 83% of the American people. Are you saying that black voters are too dumb to know what’s good for them? It sounds pretty condescending to me!” https://t.co/HN8s9lHtqC

— JM Matt (@JeffMMat) February 12, 2026

LOLOL

At this pace, they're on track to discover gravity by midsummer https://t.co/EnP3M01w6C

— David Frum (@davidfrum) February 13, 2026

BREAKING: Rep. Andy Biggs just submitted SEVERAL things into the record via a Unanimous Consent, and it TRUTH NUKES about Dems and Epstein that they don't want anyone to know:

Biggs: "Bombshell new docs show Trump called police about Epstein in 2006."
Jim Jordan: "Without… pic.twitter.com/kKKAFNKGgb

— Gunther Eagleman™ (@GuntherEagleman) February 11, 2026

BREAKING: Rep. Andy Biggs just submitted SEVERAL things into the record via a Unanimous Consent, and it TRUTH NUKES about Dems and Epstein that they don't want anyone to know:

Biggs: "Bombshell new docs show Trump called police about Epstein in 2006."
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

Biggs: "Plaskett defends Biden administration decision not to release Epstein files."
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

Biggs: "Why weren't they released during the Biden administration?"
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

Biggs: "House Democrat Stacy Plaskett exchanged texts with Epstein during 2019 congressional hearing."
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

Biggs: "New York judge allows Epstein victims' claims against Plaskett to proceed."
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

Biggs: "Hakeem Jeffries solicited funding from Epstein in 2013 after financier was convicted child sex offender."
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

Biggs: "Jeffrey Epstein was invited to Dem fundraising dinner and to get to know Hakeem Jeffries by firm working with Brooklyn's Barak."
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

Biggs: "An email from Leslie Groff to Jeffrey Epstein, uh, concerning Hakeem Jeffries-"
Jim Jordan: "Without-"

Biggs: "fundraising. Uh, Epstein file says Biden was replaced in 2019, question mark?"
Jim Jordan: "Without objection."

They HATE the truth being known and Biggs just put it in the CONGRESSIONAL RECORD. Based.

Bondi has a really good moment after qustion from Democrat Lofgren.

🚨 JUST IN: Pam Bondi absolutely WRECKS grandstanding liberal Rep. Lofgren

LOFGREN: *yelling about Trump and Epstein*

BONDI: “This isn’t a CIRCUS! This is a HEARING! She keeps going after Donald Trump… but she doesn’t say how much she took from Reid Hoffman!”

Hoffman is the… pic.twitter.com/qswm5KIPwL

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 11, 2026

Surprisingly, NBC News reported this.

🚨 LMAO! Pam Bondi just turned the tables on Rep. Chuy Garcia, who’s REPEATEDLY been condemned by both parties for corruption

“YOU’RE talking about public corruption to ME?”🤣

Then Bondi CALLED HIM OUT for corruptly appointing his successor.

Garcia, who’s quitting after this… pic.twitter.com/dumYwmSYbE

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) February 11, 2026

hokiewolf said:

---

Israel is secretly controlled by the jews

— HotSotin 🇫🇮🇺🇦🇪🇺△ NAFO (@HotSotin) February 12, 2026

---

🚨Epstein HORROR‼️ eyewitness said Israeli agent Epstein had politicians rape, kill then eat children.

This corroborates the account of 21-year-old Gabriela Rico Jimenez . pic.twitter.com/ENXIXGSGgq

— Syrian Girl (@Partisangirl) January 31, 2026

SPIRIT COOKING IS VERY REAL‼️

The Cannibal Club website is still live.

Enter their site at your own risk.

THESE PEOPLE ARE SICK AF‼️ 🤮 pic.twitter.com/vNyvmNTrd1

— RealAF Patriot (@RealAF_Patriot) April 8, 2025

NOT JUST THAT THERE IS WHOLE RITUAL CALLED SOUL COOKING PACKED AT THE PERFORMANS WATERMILLS COVERED AS DONATION NIGHT THAT MARINA HAVE ORGANIZED AT HAMPTONS IN 2013. PRESENTED GIRL’s GEAD ON A PLATE AND PEOPLE CONSUMING HER! EATING HER IN A TUB 🛀 WITH BLOOD SOUL SELLING! pic.twitter.com/a9CJB8quhq

— TAMIKA TWITKER (@MIKALIRIKA) February 11, 2026

Ole Were is turning out to be clairvoyant ;-)

"I don't think there are (political) parties. I think that's all an illusion also…it's all fake."

What is this about 5 years of being right on damn near every "conspiracy theory" I've shared. ;-)

WILD: Listen to everything said.

Roger Avary, who co-wrote Pulp Fiction, lays out an extraordinary worldview on The Joe Rogan Experience, claiming Luciferian elites, ritual sacrifice, predictive programming, and a hidden class manipulate reality.

“I think the Luciferians cast a… pic.twitter.com/5WsKT1A2hG

— Fractured Light (@FracturedLight0) February 12, 2026

Is Wexner one of those Kazarian Jews with the Mongolian DNA? Wonder what Leon Black's name was before it was Black? He's not a Kazaria Jew too, is he?

These Kazarian Jews are not of semitic DNA.

American citizens are now actively hunting down Jeffrey Epstein’s co-conspirator, Les Wexner.

Citizens are tracking down the lawyers, enablers, and politicians who allegedly helped Les Wexner evade justice for trafficking children with Jeffrey Epstein.

One citizen tells them… pic.twitter.com/dHp1Wfwlsy

— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) February 11, 2026

hokiewolf said:

---

Israel is secretly controlled by the jews

— HotSotin 🇫🇮🇺🇦🇪🇺△ NAFO (@HotSotin) February 12, 2026

---

🚨 EXPOSE: The Left’s Hypocrisy on “Authoritarianism” – Beach “Gestapo” Edition 🚨
Remember when the media and Democrats screamed “fascism!” every time Trump enforced borders? “He’s a dictator! Gestapo tactics against poor immigrants!”
Well, feast your eyes on this gem: An armed… pic.twitter.com/eFmfPNIrWB

— Greg Madden (@GregMaddenUSMC) February 8, 2026

Pretty coool. Love the military mantra now that they're back to war fighting in lieu of DEI candy ass tour of Biden and Obama.

LETHALITY AT ITS BEST.

The F-35 Lightning II -- Advanced. Stealthy. Superior. pic.twitter.com/SpnyqjH7QZ

— Department of War 🇺🇸 (@DeptofWar) February 10, 2026

Yep, either CIA, MI6 or Mossad or some combination of.

Colombia’s🇨🇴 Gustavo Petro details how he just escaped an assassination, saying his helicopter’s landing site was compromised by assassins and that he and his family had to fly out to sea and land in an alternative location.

Another CIA coup attempt? pic.twitter.com/PUOXs0O2lD

— Afshin Rattansi (@afshinrattansi) February 11, 2026