hokiewolf said:

---

Werewolf said:

---

You are 100% entitled to your opinion......even an 15 yr old has that. I'm starting to think your datum may be closer to 1995.....thus 25 yrs old. But let's further define what it entails to be that ripe old 30 yrs of age.
2 yrs as a baby
11 yrs as a kid
6 yrs as a teenager and yes, the last one as an adult

and then somewhere between 0 and 6 years as a stupid adult.......probably typical
and finally 26-30 yrs old to implement the basics of adulthood.

This platform provides you equal airtime with somebody like me. When I was 25-30 I sat and listened to my very wise life-experienced uncles of 55-70........that spoke of the times leading up to WW2 , WW2 experiences, and their many years afterward. I listened carefully and understood my place in that living room or out in the backyard....... Maybe you should start listening to your elders words of wisdom.......pay attention. We're not always right.....of course but life experience teaches each of us a lot.

---

congrats on taking the title from BBW as having the most condescending post on the WC.

---

caryking said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

packofwolves said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

Glasswolf said:

---

Against my better judgment I'm going to make a comment on this thread. I can go find several links to left leaning sites that post pro democratic websites that support some of my positions. But none of them would be good enough for some posters on this forum. I don't have the time or the desire to debate some posters on this forum. My best advice is to get out and register people to vote and let's see what happens in November. Whatever happens in November I will except

---

I have been a strong advocate for removing this forum. I'm not sure what purpose it serves. We're here to talk Pack sports...

---

I don't understand this. If you don't like a forum, just don't use it. There are plenty of forums on this site to discuss sports.

---

His problem is that he can't control what happens here. That he cannot cancel the topics that get discussed here from both sides... so he's going to whine and cry and think that if he pulls his $10 / month that it's going to get those viewpoints that he doesn't agree with shut down.

Of course, he could just stick to the four (4) SPORTS FORUMS that are here... or he could post his own topic and views on this forum.

But he's not interested in that of course.

---

You don't know a single thing about me. And your opinion on me or my character is not welcome. I really do not like when it becomes so personal like this. I was pointing out a clear racist comment and this is the crap I get. Got it dude, I'M the problem.

I am simply stating that, sure, I have the right to cancel my subscription. I did. You all are continuously claiming I want to cancel YOU - I do not... not sure how many times I can say it.

BUT can we just not do the racism? Do you all think this forum is full of homogeneous heterosexual white men who agree with you? Do you know at all if any of us are minorities, possibly muslims? Do I really need to spell this out for you?

Is this thread really an objective take on our presidency if it starts out with "Who the hell is running this **** show of an administration?" And you think I'M the sensitive cuck? Who's the group that consistently and persuasively sets off the personal attacks? And who is showing the insecurity in that situation? The group that can't accept basic election results? That are as vile to the presidency as the other party was last term? Get a damn mirror. Good lord... LOL

---

Well, I've been away a couple of day (I think) and came back to this unfortunate situation...

Wolfpack, people don't know you, correct... for that matter, I don't know Storm, Civ, Chem, BBW, werewolf, GP, etc... etc... Hell, we all know who Steve V is; however, does anyone know him? I don't. oh, don't let me forget Hokie, packgrad, XL, Glass, Oldsouljer, etc... etc...

That said, chem and I have been to blows with each other, at the same time, he and I converse respectfully, and sometimes in agreement (Nascar thread)... <- that's on the WC also, right?

Shows we're watching on Netflix, etc - WC
Music we're listening to - WC
BBQ places - WC
and so many others - WC

Wolfpack, what I don't understand is the need (I guess its a need, perhaps desire) to come on the WC and condemn posters because you don't agree with them (that's an assumption that you don't agree).

I have made it clear that the WC should (my opinion) be a "free for all" and those that want to jump in, please, do so... That said, I don't set the rules and I play by (most of the time, I think) them... I also believe the WC should be behind the pay wall, so people that aren't paying would not be allowed. That would include you.

To answer one of your questions:

Is this thread really an objective take on our presidency if it starts out with "Who the hell is running this **** show of an administration?"

Obviously, some people believe Biden is doing an ok to good job. The poles indicate it. That said, those people really need to look in the mirror and ask: what kind of country is the USA? If they think that Biden is doing ok, then they (my opinion) have a lack of understanding of what this great country is and (more importantly) what its not. No matter how the "far left" wants to change this country, it's just not who we are. Sorry, that is the truth, some need to realize it...

So, please, if you don't like the WC, don't visit... We actually have fun! I would say that everyone of us would put down the rhetorical conversations and enjoy a good beer with each other. Yea, Civ, that includes you

to quote the Great Rodney King: Can't we all get along together... As much as it appears we are bickering, and we are, we all get along together expressing our opinion. if you don't like it, move on...

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Only a racist person sees racism in that comment. And you my friend embody the typical lefty racist. If you consider that a personal attack then oh well... deal with it.

---

Wolfpack said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Only a racist person sees racism in that comment. And you my friend embody the typical lefty racist. If you consider that a personal attack then oh well... deal with it.

---

This is a ridiculous statement. You are here to trigger people, I get it. What if I was Muslim? Have you thought about that? Would I be racist towards myself?

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

BBW12OG said:

---

Only a racist person sees racism in that comment. And you my friend embody the typical lefty racist. If you consider that a personal attack then oh well... deal with it.

---

This is a ridiculous statement. You are here to trigger people, I get it. What if I was Muslim? Have you thought about that? Would I be racist towards myself?

---

Where did I EVER mention religion or ethnicity? You, as you are groomed to do, bring up race because you can't dispute the facts. Typical of a party that is too lazy to actually want to think or do for themselves. Way easier to let good ol' Uncle Gubnment to pay for your poor decision making.

But I give you credit.. you drank the kool-aid and are a good little sheep. You regurgitate exactly what you hear on the DNC/MSM networks to a "T." Keep toting that water. Maybe one day when you grow up and actually contribute to society you will wake up. Doubtful that happens but there's always a chance.

---

Wolfpack said:

---

Again, please explain to me who is trying to stay on topic and who isn't. I'm not sure what sort of freaking horse blinders some on here have, but I tried to get back on topic so we could debate two potentially intriguing political points. That's what it is about right, debate? But no, here we are, personal accusations again, so the thread devolves into a "look at me" contest.

---

Werewolf said:

---

^I can't blame his age group entirely.....I blame people my age and slightly younger for doing a shi$$y job raising children. Perfect example of why we're in the situation we're in......I hope he keeps posting.

---

Wolfpack said:

---

Again, please explain to me who is trying to stay on topic and who isn't. I'm not sure what sort of freaking horse blinders some on here have, but I tried to get back on topic so we could debate two potentially intriguing political points. That's what it is about right, debate? But no, here we are, personal accusations again, so the thread devolves into a "look at me" contest.

---

PackFansXL said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

Again, please explain to me who is trying to stay on topic and who isn't. I'm not sure what sort of freaking horse blinders some on here have, but I tried to get back on topic so we could debate two potentially intriguing political points. That's what it is about right, debate? But no, here we are, personal accusations again, so the thread devolves into a "look at me" contest.

---

Please restate your points and perhaps we can have a civil discussion. I don't want to waste time rereading all the back and forth to find what you want to discuss.

---

BBW12OG said:

---

I do believe that a few on here laughed at the Hunter laptop story, called it a "hoax," while clamoring that President Trump led an insurrection...

Where are those commentators now? Looks like the only hoax was the FBI led insurrection, Russian Collusion and President Trump being a Russian asset.

Again... if there are bigger hypocrites than the lefties please point them out.

Jen Psaki says she has "no information" about White House visitor logs showing Hunter Biden's business partner visited **19 TIMES** while Joe Biden was vice president.

🤔pic.twitter.com/AzDpjDQ1hl

— RNC Research (@RNCResearch) April 26, 2022

---

PackFansXL said:

---

Great post!

I would encourage you to try to stay above the fray by avoiding baited posts. We can all get along if we focus on the positive attributes of others. Thanks for clarifying your position on things and I hope you have a better experience around here in the future.

---

PackFansXL said:

---

Great post!

I would encourage you to try to stay above the fray by avoiding baited posts. We can all get along if we focus on the positive attributes of others. Thanks for clarifying your position on things and I hope you have a better experience around here in the future.

---

Wolfpack said:

---

PackFansXL said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

Again, please explain to me who is trying to stay on topic and who isn't. I'm not sure what sort of freaking horse blinders some on here have, but I tried to get back on topic so we could debate two potentially intriguing political points. That's what it is about right, debate? But no, here we are, personal accusations again, so the thread devolves into a "look at me" contest.

---

Please restate your points and perhaps we can have a civil discussion. I don't want to waste time rereading all the back and forth to find what you want to discuss.

---

Sure, you're right. And I apologize for derailing. Here it is:

- This is a hive mind concept and cancerous to democracy and true freedom. No, we do not all have to agree on the exact same path forward. The entire point is representation. People should vote for their own situations. If people did that (like they used to, instead of red vs. blue stuff), America would be a much better place. That's my take. There is no use in telling people they are right or wrong in their convictions. In a way, you're telling me my conviction is wrong, while telling me yours is right. This is not diverse thought, we have to learn to accept each other for exactly who they are. Thoughts?


- I believe it is racist to call someone a "goat humper". You are not calling them a goat humper because they are a terrorist (that makes no sense), you are calling them a "goat humper" because they are Muslim. That, to me, is unacceptable. I'll give you some insight, heard of Our Three Winners? Check it out. I knew them, it hurts me what happened to this day. Thoughts?

---

caryking said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

PackFansXL said:

---

Wolfpack said:

---

Again, please explain to me who is trying to stay on topic and who isn't. I'm not sure what sort of freaking horse blinders some on here have, but I tried to get back on topic so we could debate two potentially intriguing political points. That's what it is about right, debate? But no, here we are, personal accusations again, so the thread devolves into a "look at me" contest.

---

Please restate your points and perhaps we can have a civil discussion. I don't want to waste time rereading all the back and forth to find what you want to discuss.

---

Sure, you're right. And I apologize for derailing. Here it is:

- This is a hive mind concept and cancerous to democracy and true freedom. No, we do not all have to agree on the exact same path forward. The entire point is representation. People should vote for their own situations. If people did that (like they used to, instead of red vs. blue stuff), America would be a much better place. That's my take. There is no use in telling people they are right or wrong in their convictions. In a way, you're telling me my conviction is wrong, while telling me yours is right. This is not diverse thought, we have to learn to accept each other for exactly who they are. Thoughts?


- I believe it is racist to call someone a "goat humper". You are not calling them a goat humper because they are a terrorist (that makes no sense), you are calling them a "goat humper" because they are Muslim. That, to me, is unacceptable. I'll give you some insight, heard of Our Three Winners? Check it out. I knew them, it hurts me what happened to this day. Thoughts?

---

Wolfpack, yea, I think that's a very utopian mindset. It just so happens that people have been educated, in a manner, that creates different world views. Unfortunately, some on here, have to call out marxism, because it exist. Personally, I have no problem with someone wanting to believe in the Marxist ideology... Believe all you want; however, that ideology has "NO" place in our Federal Government. Sorry, it just doesn't!!! Also, a person's "own situation" is a very narcissistic mindset.

Now, for my Utopian belief... the federal government should only do what the States agreed it could do, on their behalf. Let me repeat that...

the federal government should only do what the States agreed it could do, on their behalf.

Please ask questions so you can fully understand what that means... hopefully, you already do!

---

jkpackfan said:

---

I'm sure the libs will call these guys racists, sexists, anti-environment, right wingers…am I missing anything?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/230-economists-warn-manchins-spending-bill-will-perpetuate-inflation

---

packofwolves said:

---

jkpackfan said:

---

I'm sure the libs will call these guys racists, sexists, anti-environment, right wingers…am I missing anything?

https://www.foxbusiness.com/politics/230-economists-warn-manchins-spending-bill-will-perpetuate-inflation

---

Manchin sold out for a pipeline. Can only hope Sinema sees through Manchin and Schumer's smoke screen.

---