What makes me happy? My family. Trolling you? Nope.pineknollshoresking said:Do what makes you happy? BTW, are you trolling me?Wolfpackrich1 said:pineknollshoresking said:You are!Wolfpackrich1 said:What is not True? That he called and asked for SOS to find 11780 votes? That is a funny number to ask for if all you want is to count just legal votes. Sounds to me that he just wants to change an election with fraud. That the SOS said that Trump's information was wrong? Told Trump that he should not get his information from Social Media? Then Trump said he gets his information from Trump media? Where was I wrong?pineknollshoresking said:Not true!! You progressives are all about noise...Wolfpackrich1 said:You talk about absolute power and total control like it is the Democrats and liberals doing that. I suggest you look no further than President Trump for those things. He Called Georgia's SOS and asked him to overturn the elections on nothing more than "Trump Media". Which when translated means lie's and disinformation.BBW12OG said:If you are so sure it was fair and legal then why all the brew-ha-ha over investigating? I mean it's not like Stacey Abrams hasn't claimed for four years that the election was stolen from her? It's not like HER SISTER just allowed voter roles to be allowed with people who haven't lived in Georgia for years..... nothing to see here right lefties? Absolute power and total control is all the socialists want. The very ones screaming for it will be the ones that are affected negatively the most. Never underestimate the benefit of common sense. For many today it is a difficult concept to grasp. Too many participation trophies and "everybody is a winner" mantras. Oh.... "Amen and "A-women...."Wolfpackrich1 said:I would have distaste for Trump if I was an elected official an responsible for an election and he tried to get me to overturn a fair and legal election.pineknollshoresking said:Don't know if he voted for Trump. I know Trump campaigned for Kemp; however, I'm not sure about the SOS. You can research Rafinsburger's distaste for Trump all over the place.Glasswolf said:Didn't th SOC vote and supportGround_Chuck said:pineknollshoresking said:That is such a misread of what's happening. Sounds like a typical CNN reporter.Ground_Chuck said:The facts are the certified vote totals which show Trump lost. Its why Trump asked him to find 11,780 more votes.pineknollshoresking said:
I just listened to the first 30 minutes. In the first 30 minutes, Trump did absolutely nothing wrong! Yes, Trump repeated the data, as provided to him. Not one person, on this board, has ever done the data crunching that these folks have. So, you probably need to get over yourself.
I do plan on listening to the balance of the call. Based on the beginning 30 minutes and what I have read in transcripts, I'll bet the complaints are all out of context.
Rafensburger if weak as water. He says the Gulianni doctored the tapes and the Trump team needs to see the whole tape. The one attorney (Mitchell, I think), for Trump, told Rafensburger... I have seen the entire tape and had forensic people review what you are talking about and the facts don't line up with the SOS.
Basically, what we have are people wanting something done and other people wanting to move on. None of us, here, have any clue as to the facts...
If Trump has evidence to present, he should do it. He hasn't and that's why Rafensburger's hands are tied.
Rafensburger would love to have Trump win, but he can't "find" votes that aren't there.
The facts are:
- Georgia SOS certified the results with Biden electors
- Georgia legislature certified a different set of electors for Trump
- Trump lawyers have shown evidence and Trump regurgitated the evidence on the call
- Rafensberger has no love for Trump; so, your assessment that he wants Trump to win is misinformed
You guys can all say this and/or that and that's fine... a large percentage of people in this country feel as if we have significant issues with this election. That is going to be a problem moving forward.
You say Georgia legislature named their own electors? It can't be for President. Georgia law prohibits thats, like specifically prohibits the general assembly from naming electors. The power to certify electors belongs to the SOS.
Trump lawyers have not show evidence. Evidence is something that you bring to court, not something you tweet about on the crappier.
A large percentage of people think something was wrong with this election. true, it's probably around 30%, but what do you expect from people used to getting participation trophies their whole lives. Just a really loud minority.
Trump?
Dude those who live in glass houses should not throw rocks.
You are making the noise to distract.
Also you said after the election was called for Biden by the media that you would recognize that Biden was the winner when the Election was certified by the Electoral college. That date came and went and you never once acknowledge that like you said you would. Those posts are back in November on this very topic. If you care to go look for them.
So I ask you. Who is making noise?
First of all: I haven't listened past the first 30 minutes, so, find in the transcript, with context, where the President asked his specifically to find 11,780 votes. What I have heard is him saying that all he needs to 11,780 votes to change the election and we have enough evidence to support a minimum of that number and far more.
The SOS is denying the data. Data he hasn't even looked at. This guy is part of the Descent Decree with Abrams. What exactly is a decent decree?
A consent decree is an agreement or settlement that resolves a dispute between two parties without admission of guilt (in a criminal case) or liability (in a civil case), and most often refers to such a type of settlement in the United States.
What exactly are they settling?
Also you said after the election was called for Biden by the media that you would recognize that Biden was the winner when the Election was certified by the Electoral college. That date came and went and you never once acknowledge that like you said you would.
get your dates correct. That happens on Wednesday the 6th, correct?
That date was dec 14th that is when the electoral college certified the election. You did not say when congresses certified the election. Shall I go get the post? Because it is here.
You just keep moving the goal posts.
C-span spelling,againpineknollshoresking said:BBW, the world is made up of takers and givers. Which one do you this person is?BBW12OG said:I don't have 20 aliases. I had two. The takeover by the liberals on that site is proof that the censorship by tech is real. You however should pony up and join this site if you are going to bad mouth the posters here that DO pay and are members. You are nothing but a pot stirrer. You have did it over there for years and now you are doing it here. You bring nothing of substance other than to be contrary. Get a life man.....get a life. 16 hours a day on message boards is a sad existence but one you have embraced.waynecountywolf said:Good afternoon,BBW12OG said:
The socialists are getting desperate...... you can see when wayne is bouncing from one site to the other begging someone to talk to him they are clinging to whatever "current claim" against Trump that they can muster along with the resistance that has tried to derail his presidency since he was elected. That's the treason and insurrection that should be investigated. Poor wayne.... guess you have one person that will engage with you on TOS. The only reason I acknowledged you this morning is the fact that you have spent the better part of 36 hours begging for someone to respond to you. Here you go. Maybe you should check out Indeed.com or the local help wanted ads. Do the community a favor and contribute rather then try and be a pot stirrer on message boards.
Glad I can visit each board, too bad you have to have 20 aliases since you have been banned.
Yes, that bold part is true. I shouldn't disclose this in a public forum, but in order to qualify to register as a Democrat, you first have to drink three scotch highballs, hold your head in a bucket of brackish water for at least thirty seconds, then recite the pledge of allegiance using a New England accent.BBW12OG said:So in their opinion is wasn't worth investigating? What 50 courts ruled on the Georgia case? You conflated your argument with cases in Pennsylvania, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin etc.... can't be a democrat without spinning a narrative to fit your set of facts. Pick and choose bits and pieces to assemble a story. Spin it and keep telling it. I mean it worked for Teddy Kennedy and he's one of your most admired politicians right? If the democrats and their media partners tell us something enough we are supposed to believe and live with it. BS. Those days are over. the DNC and the MSM have been in bed for decades and thank God President Trump outed them for what they are. A propaganda arm of the liberal left.dogplasma said:
AG Barr didn't see anything worth investigating. The Georgia Republican SOS is satisfied that there's nothing requiring further investigation. Fifty-some courts didn't see anything worth hearing more about.
That's real rich coming from people who refuse to listen to the evidence.Pacfanweb said:pineknollshoresking said:CSPAN can't get the words correct...waynecountywolf said:
So other than one typo, are they wrong?
You can't watch the entire tape and conclude anything else other than what they say.
Stimulus check? Spend it on this board or just go away.waynecountywolf said:C-span spelling,againpineknollshoresking said:BBW, the world is made up of takers and givers. Which one do you this person is?BBW12OG said:I don't have 20 aliases. I had two. The takeover by the liberals on that site is proof that the censorship by tech is real. You however should pony up and join this site if you are going to bad mouth the posters here that DO pay and are members. You are nothing but a pot stirrer. You have did it over there for years and now you are doing it here. You bring nothing of substance other than to be contrary. Get a life man.....get a life. 16 hours a day on message boards is a sad existence but one you have embraced.waynecountywolf said:Good afternoon,BBW12OG said:
The socialists are getting desperate...... you can see when wayne is bouncing from one site to the other begging someone to talk to him they are clinging to whatever "current claim" against Trump that they can muster along with the resistance that has tried to derail his presidency since he was elected. That's the treason and insurrection that should be investigated. Poor wayne.... guess you have one person that will engage with you on TOS. The only reason I acknowledged you this morning is the fact that you have spent the better part of 36 hours begging for someone to respond to you. Here you go. Maybe you should check out Indeed.com or the local help wanted ads. Do the community a favor and contribute rather then try and be a pot stirrer on message boards.
Glad I can visit each board, too bad you have to have 20 aliases since you have been banned.
Trump has not presented any evidence. Just fake data and spliced videos that try to confuse the facts. And that there was absolutely no widespread election fraud. Unless you consider what he and his supporters have done.pineknollshoresking said:That's real rich coming from people who refuse to listen to the evidence.Pacfanweb said:pineknollshoresking said:CSPAN can't get the words correct...waynecountywolf said:
So other than one typo, are they wrong?
You can't watch the entire tape and conclude anything else other than what they say.
You better look in the mirror, then. You are the one who is refusing to look at the evidence.pineknollshoresking said:That's real rich coming from people who refuse to listen to the evidence.Pacfanweb said:pineknollshoresking said:CSPAN can't get the words correct...waynecountywolf said:
So other than one typo, are they wrong?
You can't watch the entire tape and conclude anything else other than what they say.
And you have to swear allegiance to a selfish lying orange clown who wants to become a dictator..dogplasma said:Yes, that bold part is true. I shouldn't disclose this in a public forum, but in order to qualify to register as a Democrat, you first have to drink three scotch highballs, hold your head in a bucket of brackish water for at least thirty seconds, then recite the pledge of allegiance using a New England accent.BBW12OG said:So in their opinion is wasn't worth investigating? What 50 courts ruled on the Georgia case? You conflated your argument with cases in Pennsylvania, Nevada, Michigan, Wisconsin etc.... can't be a democrat without spinning a narrative to fit your set of facts. Pick and choose bits and pieces to assemble a story. Spin it and keep telling it. I mean it worked for Teddy Kennedy and he's one of your most admired politicians right? If the democrats and their media partners tell us something enough we are supposed to believe and live with it. BS. Those days are over. the DNC and the MSM have been in bed for decades and thank God President Trump outed them for what they are. A propaganda arm of the liberal left.dogplasma said:
AG Barr didn't see anything worth investigating. The Georgia Republican SOS is satisfied that there's nothing requiring further investigation. Fifty-some courts didn't see anything worth hearing more about.
To quote Trump for those in denial:Pacfanweb said:You better look in the mirror, then. You are the one who is refusing to look at the evidence.pineknollshoresking said:That's real rich coming from people who refuse to listen to the evidence.Pacfanweb said:pineknollshoresking said:CSPAN can't get the words correct...waynecountywolf said:
So other than one typo, are they wrong?
You can't watch the entire tape and conclude anything else other than what they say.
In fact, I've noticed a pattern with you: You are presented with evidence you can't refute. So you change the subject, or make fun of a typo in a link someone gives you...or talks about whether someone has a subscription here.....anything to deflect the fact that you have no answer for the facts you were presented with.
Then, later on you come back with "nobody's refuted the evidence" (when they have) or "Trump has this evidence"...which is always the same old refuted evidence repackaged yet again.
And then rinse and repeat. Trump's phone call with the Georgia SOS was exactly what you do: He just regurgitated, Trump-style, all the same old refuted, false claims, over and over. And when told that all those things had in fact, been investigated, he just kept right on talking, not even acknowledging it.
In fact, the closest he came to acknowledging what he'd been told was saying all the people associated with the GBI, FBI and Ga elections investigation were either "incompetent or dishonest". Said that a couple of times.
"Germany: We had our this is Ryan Germany. We had our law enforcement officers talk to everyone who was, who was there after that event came to light. GBI was with them as well as FBI agents.
Trump: Well, there's no way they could then they're incompetent. They're either dishonest or incompetent, okay?
Mitchell: Well, what did they find?
Trump: There's only two answers, dishonesty or incompetence. There's just no way. Look. There's no way."
Sorry Mr. President, but the only thing that there's "no way" is, that everyone associated with the Georgia elections, the GBI and the FBI is "dishonest or incompetent". There IS absolutely no way that's the case.
So yes, everything Trump has claimed has been refuted. It's right there for anyone to read. Not a single bit of it was true, and he keeps right on repeating it. He failed to present anything in court, he failed to present anything legitimate, anywhere.
I'm not even sure he's lying. Lying means you know it's not true and you say it anyway. I'm not even sure that's the case...after hearing him talk, he may well actually believe the crap he's saying. But he's still wrong, and it's hurting our country badly for the President of the United States to be this gullible or dishonest, whichever it is.
"Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime..."pineknollshoresking said:
Here is what we have:
- Some saying no evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
- Some saying there is evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
Then we have:
- Some saying you will follow a person off a cliff
- Some saying you are naive for not listening to the evidence
As I have said a number of times, let the process play out... I don't know the truth; however, the person I voted for is playing an uphill challenge, so, I am willing to see it through. Many of people have done the same thing for the person they voted for. In fact, many people still think Trump is an illegitimate President.
If this election gets turned back to Trump, we will have a bunch of people complaining saying he stole it, he cheated, the Republicans are power hungry, Authoritarian, etc... etc...
Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime...
I think if you were truly honest with yourself: you wouldn't say emphatically there is no evidence. You could say: no court has ruled in Trumps favor and that would be mostly correct.Wolfpackrich1 said:"Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime..."pineknollshoresking said:
Here is what we have:
- Some saying no evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
- Some saying there is evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
Then we have:
- Some saying you will follow a person off a cliff
- Some saying you are naive for not listening to the evidence
As I have said a number of times, let the process play out... I don't know the truth; however, the person I voted for is playing an uphill challenge, so, I am willing to see it through. Many of people have done the same thing for the person they voted for. In fact, many people still think Trump is an illegitimate President.
If this election gets turned back to Trump, we will have a bunch of people complaining saying he stole it, he cheated, the Republicans are power hungry, Authoritarian, etc... etc...
Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime...
WOW! What I do know. Is there is no evidence. NONE! to support this president's claims of Election Fraud. How do I know this. All the law suits dismissed or ruled against the President.
I do agree it is historic. However it is a very sad part of American history. That a sitting President is trying to overturn a fair election.
What do you call the video of people pulling suitcases of ballots out from under tables after all the poll workers were told to leave and start running them through?Wolfpackrich1 said:"Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime..."pineknollshoresking said:
Here is what we have:
- Some saying no evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
- Some saying there is evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
Then we have:
- Some saying you will follow a person off a cliff
- Some saying you are naive for not listening to the evidence
As I have said a number of times, let the process play out... I don't know the truth; however, the person I voted for is playing an uphill challenge, so, I am willing to see it through. Many of people have done the same thing for the person they voted for. In fact, many people still think Trump is an illegitimate President.
If this election gets turned back to Trump, we will have a bunch of people complaining saying he stole it, he cheated, the Republicans are power hungry, Authoritarian, etc... etc...
Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime...
WOW! What I do know. Is there is no evidence. NONE! to support this president's claims of Election Fraud. How do I know this. All the law suits dismissed or ruled against the President.
I do agree it is historic. However it is a very sad part of American history. That a sitting President is trying to overturn a fair election.
pineknollshoresking said:
Here is what we have:
- Some saying no evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
- Some saying there is evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
Then we have:
- Some saying you will follow a person off a cliff
- Some saying you are naive for not listening to the evidence
As I have said a number of times, let the process play out... I don't know the truth; however, the person I voted for is playing an uphill challenge, so, I am willing to see it through. Many of people have done the same thing for the person they voted for. In fact, many people still think Trump is an illegitimate President.
If this election gets turned back to Trump, we will have a bunch of people complaining saying he stole it, he cheated, the Republicans are power hungry, Authoritarian, etc... etc...
Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime...
The Donald is the Donald, he wants to cook the books; anything to win....he just wants 1 more vote than Biden in the swing states.. Study the man's life. Go ask people who worked with him in New York. When asked in the 1980's or 90's (?), Trump's mom said hell no he should not be president. She knew! He asked Howard Stern to be part of his administration.pineknollshoresking said:
and you have to ask yourself, why? Why doesn't certain people want to have a discussion as to what differences each party has? Somebody is correct, lets just put this to rest by meeting and showing the receipts each party has...
If the Establishment Republicans and the Democrats would just give True his day, somebody will come out looking like an idiot... Why want they do this? Whats in it for them? What will they lose?
Maybe nothing; however, it just looks crappy on their part...
He had his day, many times. He lost over and over. Your "evidence" was submitted in these court cases and judges did assess them. Even the cases dismissed for lack of standing usually have significant language about the lack of evidence submitted with the lawsuit.pineknollshoresking said:
If the Establishment Republicans and the Democrats would just give True his day, somebody will come out looking like an idiot... Why want they do this? Whats in it for them? What will they lose?
There is no video evidence. There is only spliced videos from Trumps legal team. As the SOS of Georgia told President Trump on the phone call. Georgia Election officials went through this yesterday item by item and countered every Trump team claim. See link below.cowboypack02 said:What do you call the video of people pulling suitcases of ballots out from under tables after all the poll workers were told to leave and start running them through?Wolfpackrich1 said:"Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime..."pineknollshoresking said:
Here is what we have:
- Some saying no evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
- Some saying there is evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
Then we have:
- Some saying you will follow a person off a cliff
- Some saying you are naive for not listening to the evidence
As I have said a number of times, let the process play out... I don't know the truth; however, the person I voted for is playing an uphill challenge, so, I am willing to see it through. Many of people have done the same thing for the person they voted for. In fact, many people still think Trump is an illegitimate President.
If this election gets turned back to Trump, we will have a bunch of people complaining saying he stole it, he cheated, the Republicans are power hungry, Authoritarian, etc... etc...
Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime...
WOW! What I do know. Is there is no evidence. NONE! to support this president's claims of Election Fraud. How do I know this. All the law suits dismissed or ruled against the President.
I do agree it is historic. However it is a very sad part of American history. That a sitting President is trying to overturn a fair election.
How about the video evidence released this morning of folks in Georgia registering thousands of people at a single address in order to allow them to vote, which is illegal by Georgia law?
You can argue that a court hasn't taken on a case, but you can't argue that there isn't any evidence because we have actual video evidence to the contrary.
Your entitled to your own opinion, but your not entitled to you own facts. There is only one set of facts, and the fact is there is actual video evidence that election fraud happened.
So spliced videos, selected sound bites and not providing complete information is no longer allowed? Well...it damn sure has been for the last four years. Selective memory and hypocrisy is something that the liberal democrats will never shy away from. Keep flailing....Wolfpackrich1 said:There is no video evidence. There is only spliced videos from Trumps legal team. As the SOS of Georgia told President Trump on the phone call. Georgia Election officials went through this yesterday item by item and countered every Trump team claim. See link below.cowboypack02 said:What do you call the video of people pulling suitcases of ballots out from under tables after all the poll workers were told to leave and start running them through?Wolfpackrich1 said:"Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime..."pineknollshoresking said:
Here is what we have:
- Some saying no evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
- Some saying there is evidence and/or listening to people they align with to support their opinion
Then we have:
- Some saying you will follow a person off a cliff
- Some saying you are naive for not listening to the evidence
As I have said a number of times, let the process play out... I don't know the truth; however, the person I voted for is playing an uphill challenge, so, I am willing to see it through. Many of people have done the same thing for the person they voted for. In fact, many people still think Trump is an illegitimate President.
If this election gets turned back to Trump, we will have a bunch of people complaining saying he stole it, he cheated, the Republicans are power hungry, Authoritarian, etc... etc...
Not one person on here knows whether Trump lawyers, Data analyst, Trump himself is truthful. Also, not one person on here knows whether they all are not. I know some on here don't like what's going on; however, I'm watching this because we could be witnessing history. History we only read about, not truly live. You don't have to like what's going; however, open your eyes and watch this play out as this may be something we've never seen in our lifetime...
WOW! What I do know. Is there is no evidence. NONE! to support this president's claims of Election Fraud. How do I know this. All the law suits dismissed or ruled against the President.
I do agree it is historic. However it is a very sad part of American history. That a sitting President is trying to overturn a fair election.
How about the video evidence released this morning of folks in Georgia registering thousands of people at a single address in order to allow them to vote, which is illegal by Georgia law?
You can argue that a court hasn't taken on a case, but you can't argue that there isn't any evidence because we have actual video evidence to the contrary.
Your entitled to your own opinion, but your not entitled to you own facts. There is only one set of facts, and the fact is there is actual video evidence that election fraud happened.
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/04/953321408/georgia-election-official-dont-let-misinformation-suppress-your-own-vote
You guys are the most closed minded people I've ever been around. Quit fighting your narrative and find room for possibilities. Thats what I have done and have stated it a number of times in this forum.IseWolf22 said:He had his day, many times. He lost over and over. Your "evidence" was submitted in these court cases and judges did assess them. Even the cases dismissed for lack of standing usually have significant language about the lack of evidence submitted with the lawsuit.pineknollshoresking said:
If the Establishment Republicans and the Democrats would just give True his day, somebody will come out looking like an idiot... Why want they do this? Whats in it for them? What will they lose?
You act like no one has investigated any of these claims, when they have been looked into and almost entirely debunked. You just refuse to accept that the claims you've read are largely based on bad data, terrible analysis, or outright fabrication.
Do you understand how the courts work?pineknollshoresking said:
Go through every one of the court cases (since this is what you are leaning on) and tell us all how many of them were settled on evidence. I think you will find that the majority were settled on: No standing or Laches.
Those two do not take in consideration evidence. We have had judges write commentary; however, they rule on one the two. That's complete crap and you know it. If you don't then...
Agree!!! These non-payers are takers!!!BBW12OG said:
Another free loading pot stirrer...not even a NCSU fan at that..... such a sad little existance.
pineknollshoresking said:
Do you understand how the courts work? Yes!