I'm talking about companies like YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter that when they were originally founded held themselves out to be "public commons", in which ALL viewpoints were allowed and everyone was able to speak freely without censorship. Since their foundings, however, they have obviously changed from that position and now heavily censor their sites -- mostly censoring right-wing and anti-Establishment views.statefan91 said:I'm not sure I follow what you're saying? Do you think Fox News should be forced to air BLM commercials? Do you think TPUSA should have to host content about LGBTQ+ rights? If a message is incompatible with their target audience then they shouldn't be forced to air it / show it.GuerrillaPack said:Ok. I was pretty sure that you don't believe in freedom of speech, and are fully on board with the Leftist agenda to censor the right-wing in every way possible. It's just a bonus to have you admit it.statefan91 said:
Yes, if you were using my platform to say something that caused me to lose money in my business I would censor you. Any company that doesn't is dumb.
Seems weird that you would want to tell private companies how they should operate.
It's one thing if the site is clearly identified as a right or left wing site -- in which it clearly makes sense for them to have a bias, and censor one way or the other. But I'm talking about websites that pretended as if they supported free speech for everyone, when that is obviously not the case.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19