Wiggins is going to just take the spot in the lineup if Avent is going to force him to.

Wiggins has to play. Dont care where but he has to be in the lineup

Again, I'd let Wiggins play vs righties and Fraasman vs lefties.

EA will not do that though and someone is going to end up just riding the bench.

Borowolf10 said:

---

How come every year in every sport, there is always a guy that obviously should be getting opportunity and the coach just can't seem figure it out.

Literally everyone else sees the vision. Avent can't.

This happens in football and basketball. Play your best players.

---

He's too loyal and it's a very old school approach.

Borowolf10 said:

---

How come every year in every sport, there is always a guy that obviously should be getting opportunity and the coach just can't seem figure it out.

Literally everyone else sees the vision. Avent can't.

This happens in football and basketball. Play your best players.

---

Sanders mentioned that EA told him there are several players he has to figure out a way to get them more at bats. Wiggins was mentioned specifically

Glasswolf said:

---

Borowolf10 said:

---

How come every year in every sport, there is always a guy that obviously should be getting opportunity and the coach just can't seem figure it out.

Literally everyone else sees the vision. Avent can't.

This happens in football and basketball. Play your best players.

---

Sanders mentioned that EA told him there are several players he has to figure out a way to get them more at bats. Wiggins was mentioned specifically

---

Is it that tough to figure out? Id flip flop how hes using Fraasman and Wiggins. At least give Wiggins more at bats so you can see a larger sample size to gauge better. You know what you get from Fraasman.

Alex Gee said:

---

Think it's interesting that benching Fraasman moved Rett to RF and put Wiggins in left.

---

I can see McHugh going to left, Bargo to first, Johnson to right and Wiggins DH.

I think wiggins would be in OF and sherman at dh but I agree 10000%. This would produce the best lineup top to bottom state has had in a long time.

Ethan and I have beat the drum quite a bit but you don't have a career .450 OBP by accident. At the very least, Wiggins needs to be batting in the top half of the order against righties.

Jtilley said:

---

Alex Gee said:

---

Think it's interesting that benching Fraasman moved Rett to RF and put Wiggins in left.

---

I can see McHugh going to left, Bargo to first, Johnson to right and Wiggins DH.

---

Believe they have only used McHugh in left the first game and that was it. Another head scratcher. Believe the other games Bargo played 1st McHugh was DH. Im not sure they are comfortable with Bargos defense at 1st so could see him mostly at DH.

Pack31 said:

---

I love that the biggest argument on here is how do we get all these good bats in the lineup. Its a good start to the season!

---

Well that and scheduling teams where this is their first time going outside in 4 months.

5thyear said:

---

I think wiggins would be in OF and sherman at dh but I agree 10000%. This would produce the best lineup top to bottom state has had in a long time.

---

I don't hate that either. I just don't care enough about LF/RF defense to keep Wiggins bat out of the lineup. Especially when you have one of the better defensive CF in the game and Rhett covering the other spot.

Runs Rule!

That's 62 runs scored over the last three games for the second most over a three-game stretch in program history! pic.twitter.com/MpIc16CM1Q

— NC State Baseball (@NCStateBaseball) February 27, 2026

Jtilley said:

---

5thyear said:

---

I think wiggins would be in OF and sherman at dh but I agree 10000%. This would produce the best lineup top to bottom state has had in a long time.

---

I don't hate that either. I just don't care enough about LF/RF defense to keep Wiggins bat out of the lineup. Especially when you have one of the better defensive CF in the game and Rhett covering the other spot.

---

Then that leaves you with what to do with Bargo, McHugh, Fraasman, Novy. But I agree that Wiggins needs to be in there somewhere

Glasswolf said:

---

Jtilley said:

---

5thyear said:

---

I think wiggins would be in OF and sherman at dh but I agree 10000%. This would produce the best lineup top to bottom state has had in a long time.

---

I don't hate that either. I just don't care enough about LF/RF defense to keep Wiggins bat out of the lineup. Especially when you have one of the better defensive CF in the game and Rhett covering the other spot.

---

Then that leaves you with what to do with Bargo, McHugh, Fraasman, Novy. But I agree that Wiggins needs to be in there somewhere

---

Can't play everyone but Fraasman starting to feel like odd man out.

I work with a guy who apparently has a contact close to Avent (I know), but he told me couple weeks ago Avent said this team is one of the best, if not the best hitting team top to bottom he's had.

He's been right about a bunch other stuff before but when he told me that I just kind of laughed it off. Its still hard with the comp we're playing but does feel like this team will hit.

The team has potential. Deepest pitching I can recall. There are about 13 good offensive choices. The defense doesn't seem as good as some of Avent's best, but not a liability either.

I can't wait for Coastal and the ACC.

This is the deepest team I've ever seen under Avent. So many good options to choose from. Good problems to have but still a problem to figure out.

We won't know how good this team is or can be until April. This team has all the potential to be great and we all want them to be great as well.