#Pack9 vs Belmont 2/24-26 (11-4 win, 7-0 win, 7-1 win(

11,110 Views | 81 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Wolfer79
FlockaWolf
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to FlockaWolf • 2:28p, 2/26/23
FlockaWolf said:
Rough start to the season continues for Gino


Making some nice plays at 3rd though
Reply Quote
Wolfer79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:00p, 2/26/23
Reply Quote
Wolfer79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:38p, 2/26/23
Reply Quote
Wolfer79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:38p, 2/26/23
Reply Quote
Wolfer79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:42p, 2/26/23
Reply Quote
Wolfer79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:01p, 2/26/23
Reply Quote
2
pack2010
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:59p, 2/26/23
went back and rewatched some of frittons stuff today, kid looks really solid.

was the radar gun right today? it had him 81-83 but i don't think that's right. however, it did have lawson at 91-93 towards the end of the game
Reply Quote
1
Alex Gee
User Profile
Private Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to pack2010 • 6:00p, 2/26/23
Staff
pack2010 said:
went back and rewatched some of frittons stuff today, kid looks really solid.

was the radar gun right today? it had him 81-83 but i don't think that's right. however, it did have lawson at 91-93 towards the end of the game


It was way, way off early. I think corrected itself around the 5th and showed more accurate numbers (88-91 for fritton). No way he was throwing 65-82 lol.
Reply Quote
pack2010
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Alex Gee • 6:03p, 2/26/23
Alex Gee said:
pack2010 said:
went back and rewatched some of frittons stuff today, kid looks really solid.

was the radar gun right today? it had him 81-83 but i don't think that's right. however, it did have lawson at 91-93 towards the end of the game


It was way, way off early. I think corrected itself around the 5th and showed more accurate numbers (88-91 for fritton). No way he was throwing 65-82 lol.

appreciate it. i only watched the first few innings, so that makes sense. it looked belmont was a little tardy on a few fastballs, so it was throwing me off. that's a good velo for Fritton right now, especially with that hook.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Wolfer79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:07p, 2/26/23
Reply Quote
SportManagementEngineer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Wolfer79 • 4:10p, 2/27/23
Wolfer79 said:
If Lawson can thrive in the closer role and we can move Highfill back to the starting rotation, it would give us a really good chance to make a postseason run with the early returns from our lineup.
Twitter: @JJwith2Jays
Reply Quote
1
Wolfer79
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:56a, 2/28/23
Reply Quote
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.