packgrad said:

---

Democrats wanted Trump. They ran ads for him in the primary. They thought they could run their weekend at Bernie's candidate out there and their minions would vote for him again. Their minions would have , but they realized after the debate that wouldn't be enough. So then they usurped their elected candidate and installed their weekend at Bernie's 2 candidate. They tried hiding her. They kept her to a script. Few but only friendly interviews. They dug in on their antisemitic position by not choosing Shapiro.

An absolute disaster all the way around that is reflective of their poor leadership, decision making, and how much they value the American voter.

---

Republicans lost three straight elections because they kept running losing MAGA candidates out there.

So obviously you must think that was reflective of the Republicans' poor leadership and decision-making and how little Republicans value the American voter?

TheStorm said:

---

I'm just waiting for Civ to explain why all his favorite polls were wrong, and why the ones he said were wrong ended up being right.

---

I eagerly await your quantitative poll breakdown Storm.

Interested to see what road Trump decides to take, Nixon or Rasputin. Nice to have an election decided in one night though.

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Democrats wanted Trump. They ran ads for him in the primary. They thought they could run their weekend at Bernie's candidate out there and their minions would vote for him again. Their minions would have , but they realized after the debate that wouldn't be enough. So then they usurped their elected candidate and installed their weekend at Bernie's 2 candidate. They tried hiding her. They kept her to a script. Few but only friendly interviews. They dug in on their antisemitic position by not choosing Shapiro.

An absolute disaster all the way around that is reflective of their poor leadership, decision making, and how much they value the American voter.

---

Republicans lost three straight elections because they kept running losing MAGA candidates out there.

So obviously you must think that was reflective of the Republicans' poor leadership and decision-making and how little Republicans value the American voter?

---

Isn't that what you said over and over and over? Hahaha. Shoe is on the other foot now. Take your medicine.

Just kidding. I know you won't. You're pretty consistent in your hypocrisy.

---

Losing three straight elections, all for similar reasons, is a fairly large and consistent sample.

This election was mostly a repudiation of the Biden economy. Harris started 3.5 months ago deeply underwater in approval, and somehow got it back to almost a coin flip.

Trump winning this election was the easy part, now he's got to actually govern.

Get back to me at mid-terms, or after Vance wins in 2028, and let's assess party leadership and decision-making and valuing voters.

The good news for us all, as always, is either Trump and Vance kill it, in which case we're all winning, or they don't, and voters can go a different direction in 4 years.

Civilized said:

---

TheStorm said:

---

I'm just waiting for Civ to explain why all his favorite polls were wrong, and why the ones he said were wrong ended up being right.

---

I eagerly await your quantitative poll breakdown Storm.

---

Hey Cuckboy…. You said several times….. "Trump will never be President again…"

Go sit in your corner chair and watch.

As far as the unc guy goes, he hasn't got an ounce of moral fortitude to show up again.

Thanks for accentuating my point.

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Wellness check for Sampty. You good?

---

If he get off the milk carton, I may have to take him off ignore for a little while and enjoy the laughs.

packgrad said:

---

Gulfstream4 said:

---

Wellness check for Sampty. You good?

---

If he get off the milk carton, I may have to take him off ignore for a little while and enjoy the laughs.

---

The hilarity to ensue will be comedy gold.

Wufpack17 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Democrats wanted Trump. They ran ads for him in the primary. They thought they could run their weekend at Bernie's candidate out there and their minions would vote for him again. Their minions would have , but they realized after the debate that wouldn't be enough. So then they usurped their elected candidate and installed their weekend at Bernie's 2 candidate. They tried hiding her. They kept her to a script. Few but only friendly interviews. They dug in on their antisemitic position by not choosing Shapiro.

An absolute disaster all the way around that is reflective of their poor leadership, decision making, and how much they value the American voter.

---

Republicans lost three straight elections because they kept running losing MAGA candidates out there.

So obviously you must think that was reflective of the Republicans' poor leadership and decision-making and how little Republicans value the American voter?

---

Isn't that what you said over and over and over? Hahaha. Shoe is on the other foot now. Take your medicine.

Just kidding. I know you won't. You're pretty consistent in your hypocrisy.

---

Losing three straight elections, all for similar reasons, is a fairly large and consistent sample.

This election was mostly a repudiation of the Biden economy. Harris started 3.5 months ago deeply underwater in approval, and somehow got it back to almost a coin flip.

Trump winning this election was the easy part, now he's got to actually govern.

Get back to me at mid-terms, or after Vance wins in 2028, and let's assess party leadership and decision-making and valuing voters.

The good news for us all, as always, is either Trump and Vance kill it, in which case we're all winning, or they don't, and voters can go a different direction in 4 years.

---

The fact that Republicans are likely to control the government, is a damming statement on the current status of the democrat party. It has gone so far left that moderate dems are voting republican.

Dems need to rid themselves of the radicals that have taken control.

---

Really?

Which radicals have taken control?

packgrad said:

---

The View ratings will be through the roof today.

---

Oh the weeping!

hokiewolf said:

---

Bas2020 said:

---

Trump has won Wisconsin and Pennsylvania .

Nevada might be within 20,000 votes but he ultimately wins that also .

Michigan who knows … but doesn't matter .

Now put a cushion of R + 55 in the Senate .

---

The Senate isn't going to be 55. 53 at best. Harris probably wins Michigan and Nevada. It's all down to three cities now, Milwaukee, Detroit, and Philly

---

How's the senate looking this morning ?

Has Kamala conceded yet?

There is talk/speculation that the Democrats may be plotting to do what some democrats (Raskin in Congress) have suggested and pursuing some sort of "legal" action (such as not certifying the election in Congress) in order to attempt to keep Trump from taking office.

FlossyDFlynt said:

---

Im not surprised Trump won. However I am very surprised that (at least as of now) hes going to take the popular vote as well.

---

Some people call that a mandate.

Bas2020 said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Bas2020 said:

---

Trump has won Wisconsin and Pennsylvania .

Nevada might be within 20,000 votes but he ultimately wins that also .

Michigan who knows … but doesn't matter .

Now put a cushion of R + 55 in the Senate .

---

The Senate isn't going to be 55. 53 at best. Harris probably wins Michigan and Nevada. It's all down to three cities now, Milwaukee, Detroit, and Philly

---

How's the senate looking this morning ?

---

It's looking good enough to confirm anyone Trump wants confirmed.

Civilized said:

---

Wufpack17 said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Civilized said:

---

packgrad said:

---

Democrats wanted Trump. They ran ads for him in the primary. They thought they could run their weekend at Bernie's candidate out there and their minions would vote for him again. Their minions would have , but they realized after the debate that wouldn't be enough. So then they usurped their elected candidate and installed their weekend at Bernie's 2 candidate. They tried hiding her. They kept her to a script. Few but only friendly interviews. They dug in on their antisemitic position by not choosing Shapiro.

An absolute disaster all the way around that is reflective of their poor leadership, decision making, and how much they value the American voter.

---

Republicans lost three straight elections because they kept running losing MAGA candidates out there.

So obviously you must think that was reflective of the Republicans' poor leadership and decision-making and how little Republicans value the American voter?

---

Isn't that what you said over and over and over? Hahaha. Shoe is on the other foot now. Take your medicine.

Just kidding. I know you won't. You're pretty consistent in your hypocrisy.

---

Losing three straight elections, all for similar reasons, is a fairly large and consistent sample.

This election was mostly a repudiation of the Biden economy. Harris started 3.5 months ago deeply underwater in approval, and somehow got it back to almost a coin flip.

Trump winning this election was the easy part, now he's got to actually govern.

Get back to me at mid-terms, or after Vance wins in 2028, and let's assess party leadership and decision-making and valuing voters.

The good news for us all, as always, is either Trump and Vance kill it, in which case we're all winning, or they don't, and voters can go a different direction in 4 years.

---

The fact that Republicans are likely to control the government, is a damming statement on the current status of the democrat party. It has gone so far left that moderate dems are voting republican.

Dems need to rid themselves of the radicals that have taken control.

---

Really?

Which radicals have taken control?

---

This could be like that crazy relative question. Every family has one and if you can't identify them then it's probably you.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Has Kamala conceded yet?

There is talk/speculation that the Democrats may be plotting to do what some democrats (Raskin in Congress) have suggested and pursuing some sort of "legal" action (such as not certifying the election in Congress) in order to attempt to keep Trump from taking office.

---

That would be the nail in the coffin for the current Democratic Party. The mandate of the people just spoke yesterday. To ignore the voice of the majority of Americans who just voiced their support of conservatism would be political suicide for any Democrat who has intention of running for political office in the future.

wolf howl said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Has Kamala conceded yet?

There is talk/speculation that the Democrats may be plotting to do what some democrats (Raskin in Congress) have suggested and pursuing some sort of "legal" action (such as not certifying the election in Congress) in order to attempt to keep Trump from taking office.

---

This would be their next play and if they are dumb enough to do that, then God help us all.

---

For sure, if they decide to try that….

few thoughts...

- Congrats to the Republicans. that was more than just a statement.

- i spent most of the night bouncing around between the 3 main networks and the energy shift in the studios were palpable. CNN actually did a decent job of holding together some neutrality but msnbc was like walking the green mile.

- trump could replace 2-4 justices in his next term which i think is a topic that dem's missed out on

- Polls and the MSM. were both cancelled last night?

CoachCase said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Has Kamala conceded yet?

There is talk/speculation that the Democrats may be plotting to do what some democrats (Raskin in Congress) have suggested and pursuing some sort of "legal" action (such as not certifying the election in Congress) in order to attempt to keep Trump from taking office.

---

That would be the nail in the coffin for the current Democratic Party. The mandate of the people just spoke yesterday. To ignore the voice of the majority of Americans who just voiced their support of conservatism would be political suicide for any Democrat who has intention of running for political office in the future.

---

Don't underestimate Trump Derangement Syndrome.

Bas2020 said:

---

caryking said:

---

Biden didn't get 82M votes.

---

I'd like to finally see a congressional deep dive into the fraud of the 2020 election . No way did 20 million people just vanish and suddenly not vote again four years later .

There are a lot of people scared ****less in the DC right now in the DOJ, FBI , IRS, etc .

---

Here you go...

59,028,444 - 62,040,610
69,498,516 - 59,948,323
65,915,795 - 60,933,504
65,853,514 - 62,984,828
81,283,501 - 74,223,975
66,367,690 - 71,290,770 (So Far)

Bas2020 said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

Bas2020 said:

---

Trump has won Wisconsin and Pennsylvania .

Nevada might be within 20,000 votes but he ultimately wins that also .

Michigan who knows … but doesn't matter .

Now put a cushion of R + 55 in the Senate .

---

The Senate isn't going to be 55. 53 at best. Harris probably wins Michigan and Nevada. It's all down to three cities now, Milwaukee, Detroit, and Philly

---

How's the senate looking this morning ?

---

about 52 republicans.

wolf howl said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Has Kamala conceded yet?

There is talk/speculation that the Democrats may be plotting to do what some democrats (Raskin in Congress) have suggested and pursuing some sort of "legal" action (such as not certifying the election in Congress) in order to attempt to keep Trump from taking office.

---

This would be their next play and if they are dumb enough to do that, then God help us all.

---

This is the reason why the Pubs need to hold onto the House. Raskin has made it clear that he will try to invoke section 3 of the 14th amendment, if Trump gets elected...