Yes, the idea of a spinning magic waterball earth is just a theory. The full Marxist Luciferian Establishment theory of the origin and nature of the universe is that 14 billion years ago all matter in the entire universe was condensed down to the space smaller than the tip of a pen, then "Big Bang" it exploded and everything went flying out in all directions at millions of miles an hour, and we now live on a rock flying through space after a few billion years ago lightning struck the primordial soup and created an amoeba which over millions of years turned into monkeys and apes which are your great great grandfather.

And gullible idiots who hate God have been brainwashed to believe that this is "unquestionable science".

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Yes, the idea of a spinning magic waterball earth is just a theory. The full Marxist Luciferian Establishment theory of the origin and nature of the universe is that 14 billion years ago all matter in the entire universe was condensed down to the space smaller than the tip of a pen, then "Big Bang" it exploded and everything went flying out in all directions at millions of miles an hour, and we now live on a rock flying through space after a few billion years ago lightning struck the primordial soup and created an amoeba which over millions of years turned into monkeys and apes which are your great great grandfather.

And gullible idiots who hate God have been brainwashed to believe that this is "unquestionable science".

---

I hate God? News to me. Guess all that time I spend in church is for nothing. Sad.

What if God created the Earth as a sphere?

MoCoWolf said:

---

I hate God? News to me. Guess all that time I spend in church is for nothing. Sad.

What if God created the Earth as a sphere?

---

The Bible clearly teaches that the earth is not only a flat plane, but also that it does not move and that it is fixed and immovable, and that it is the sun, moon and stars which move about the earth, and not the earth that moves.

Psalm 93:1 - "the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved"

Psalm 104:5 - "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved."


The entire reason that Luciferian Freemasons and Marxists in pseudo "academia" created the heliocentric theory, the globe earth theory, and later the hairbrained Big Bang theory and theory of evolution was as an attack on the Bible. They were trying to create this false idea that "science" has "disproved the Bible"...and therefore we cannot rely on the Bible for truth, and should also reject belief in God.

What route did Japan take to attack pearl habor if the earth is flat?

Wolfpack8602 said:

---

What route did Japan take to attack pearl habor if the earth is flat?

---

He has a map to answer that one! Just wait until you see it.

TheStorm said:

---

Wolfpack8602 said:

---

What route did Japan take to attack pearl habor if the earth is flat?

---

He has a map to answer that one! Just wait until you see it.

---

I'm genuinely curious. I'm not really ever going to believe the earth is flat but I don't mind listen to others opinions.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

I hate God? News to me. Guess all that time I spend in church is for nothing. Sad.

What if God created the Earth as a sphere?

---

The Bible clearly teaches that the earth is not only a flat plane, but also that it does not move and that it is fixed and immovable, and that it is the sun, moon and stars which move about the earth, and not the earth that moves.

Psalm 93:1 - "the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved"

Psalm 104:5 - "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved."


The entire reason that Luciferian Freemasons and Marxists in pseudo "academia" created the heliocentric theory, the globe earth theory, and later the hairbrained Big Bang theory and theory of evolution was as an attack on the Bible. They were trying to create this false idea that "science" has "disproved the Bible"...and therefore we cannot rely on the Bible for truth, and should also reject belief in God.

---

So why do Universities like Liberty, Notre Dame, Presbyterian, Methodist, etc. not teach flat earth in their science curriculum?

MoCoWolf said:

---

So why do Universities like Liberty, Notre Dame, Presbyterian, Methodist, etc. not teach flat earth in their science curriculum?

---

The infiltration by the agents of the enemy (Satan) is deep. Not only in academia, but into virtually every religious denomination, especially at the highest levels and hierarchy/leadership of those organizations - resulting in major false doctrines being taught from the pulpits of 99.99% of Christian denominations. Many churches also teach that the Big Bang theory and theory of evolution are "true" and "compatible with the Bible".

But it goes much deeper than just the nature of the earth or cosmology, with false doctrines being taught on MANY crucial issues -- such as churches now accepting homosexuality, saying that "there are multiple paths to God" and that "Jesus is NOT the only way", and teaching that you don't have to repent and that God's commandments have been "abolished" and all you have to do "to be saved" is say one prayer and have an intellectual "belief" that Jesus is the Messiah.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

So why do Universities like Liberty, Notre Dame, Presbyterian, Methodist, etc. not teach flat earth in their science curriculum?

---

The infiltration by the agents of the enemy (Satan) is deep. Not only in academia, but into virtually every religious denomination, especially at the highest levels and hierarchy/leadership of those organizations - resulting in major false doctrines being taught from the pulpits of 99.99% of Christian denominations. Many churches also teach that the Big Bang theory and theory of evolution are "true" and "compatible with the Bible".

But it goes much deeper than just the nature of the earth or cosmology, with false doctrines being taught on MANY crucial issues -- such as churches now accepting homosexuality, saying that "there are multiple paths to God" and that "Jesus is NOT the only way", and teaching that you don't have to repent and that God's commandments have been "abolished" and all you have to do "to be saved" is say one prayer and have an intellectual "belief" that Jesus is the Messiah.

---

So how is the church you attend immune from these issues?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

So why do Universities like Liberty, Notre Dame, Presbyterian, Methodist, etc. not teach flat earth in their science curriculum?

---

The infiltration by the agents of the enemy (Satan) is deep. Not only in academia, but into virtually every religious denomination, especially at the highest levels and hierarchy/leadership of those organizations - resulting in major false doctrines being taught from the pulpits of 99.99% of Christian denominations. Many churches also teach that the Big Bang theory and theory of evolution are "true" and "compatible with the Bible".

But it goes much deeper than just the nature of the earth or cosmology, with false doctrines being taught on MANY crucial issues -- such as churches now accepting homosexuality, saying that "there are multiple paths to God" and that "Jesus is NOT the only way", and teaching that you don't have to repent and that God's commandments have been "abolished" and all you have to do "to be saved" is say one prayer and have an intellectual "belief" that Jesus is the Messiah.

---

Also, one other question, you seem to be a big fan of NC State Athletics, especially some of our Olympic Sports. How do you cheer for a school that has a science curriculum you would not agree with, and for some of these athletes who probably do not hold the same values that you do? How do you square that?

hokiewolf said:

---

I don't know man, my church teaches straight out of the Bible and we have yet to have a flat earth sermon

---

But he covers that by saying 99.9 % are wrong. Can't be trusted on the shape of the earth, but can be on how the earth is made and all that
Amd o want to know how we all emanated from one couple but we have Swedes and their light skinned blonde people and Rwanda and it's dark skinned people?
And none of them ever reached the edge

Packchem91 said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

I don't know man, my church teaches straight out of the Bible and we have yet to have a flat earth sermon

---

But he covers that by saying 99.9 % are wrong. Can't be trusted on the shape of the earth, but can be on how the earth is made and all that
Amd o want to know how we all emanated from one couple but we have Swedes and their light skinned blonde people and Rwanda and it's dark skinned people?
And none of them ever reached the edge

---

According to the preposterous theory of evolution religion, not only all humans but all animals on earth (cats, dogs, birds, etc) came from an AMOEBA that was struck by the primordial soup. That's one trillion times more impossible than a separate race of humans coming from different race of other humans.

But I do actually agree with you on the point that all races of humans could not have some from one couple, Adam and Eve.

And the Bible, when translated and interpreted correctly, does not teach that. The truth is that only the white race came from Adam and Eve.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

hokiewolf said:

---

I don't know man, my church teaches straight out of the Bible and we have yet to have a flat earth sermon

---

But he covers that by saying 99.9 % are wrong. Can't be trusted on the shape of the earth, but can be on how the earth is made and all that
Amd o want to know how we all emanated from one couple but we have Swedes and their light skinned blonde people and Rwanda and it's dark skinned people?
And none of them ever reached the edge

---

According to the preposterous theory of evolution religion, we all came from an AMOEBA that was struck by the primordial soup. That's one trillion times more impossible than a separate race of humans coming from different race of other humans.

But I do actually agree with you on the point that all races of humans could not have some from one couple, Adam and Eve.

And the Bible, when translated and interpreted correctly, does not teach that. The truth is that only the white race came from Adam and Eve.

---

lol, Good ol 9 pound blond hair, blue eyed baby Jesus.

Packchem91 said:

---

lol, Good ol 9 pound blond hair, blue eyed baby Jesus.

---

If you hate blonde people and people with blue eyes, that's your problem, not mine.

Do you really believe that if you look at one geographical location on the earth 2,000 years ago, that it means the racial make-up of that geographical location will be exactly the same after 2,000 years? For instance, if you were to look at Australia or North America 2,000 years ago, there were only asiatic and dark-skinned aboriginals and no white people.

The racial demographics in Egypt, Palestine, the land of Israel, Iraq and all through the Middle East have changed drastically over the last 2,000 years. Many of the Pharaohs and rulers of Egypt were actually white. Google the "red and blonde haired mummies of Egypt", and look at the pictures.

They DNA tested King Tut, and found that he was racially most similar to Western European peoples. KIng Tut was far more racially similar to modern-day Europeans than modern-day Egyptians.

https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-idUSTRE7704PB/

Quote:

---

Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

August 1, 2011

LONDON (Reuters) - Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.

[...]

The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.

Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.

---

How about that blonde haired blue eyed King Tut?

LOL

^sounds a whole lot like evolution

GuerrillaPack said:

---

Packchem91 said:

---

lol, Good ol 9 pound blond hair, blue eyed baby Jesus.

---

If you hate blonde people and people with blue eyes, that's your problem, not mine.

Do you really believe that if you look at one geographical location on the earth 2,000 years ago, that it means the racial make-up of that geographical location will be exactly the same after 2,000 years? For instance, if you were to look at Australia or North America 2,000 years ago, there were only asiatic and dark-skinned aboriginals and no white people.

The racial demographics in Egypt, Palestine, the land of Israel, Iraq and all through the Middle East have changed drastically over the last 2,000 years. Many of the Pharaohs and rulers of Egypt were actually white. Google the "red and blonde haired mummies of Egypt", and look at the pictures.

They DNA tested King Tut, and found that he was racially most similar to Western European peoples. KIng Tut was far more racially similar to modern-day Europeans than modern-day Egyptians.

https://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyle/half-of-european-men-share-king-tuts-dna-idUSTRE7704PB/

Quote:

---

Half of European men share King Tut's DNA

August 1, 2011

LONDON (Reuters) - Up to 70 percent of British men and half of all Western European men are related to the Egyptian Pharaoh Tutankhamun, geneticists in Switzerland said.

[...]

The results showed that King Tut belonged to a genetic profile group, known as haplogroup R1b1a2, to which more than 50 percent of all men in Western Europe belong, indicating that they share a common ancestor.

Among modern-day Egyptians this haplogroup contingent is below 1 percent, according to iGENEA.

---

How about that blonde haired blue eyed King Tut?

LOL

---

There's white and then there's Nordic, and at Egypt's position on the globe, I do not see any need for those kind of heritable traits being in the royal bloodlines, if for no other reason than they'd need to be able to tan hard and deep at that latitude.

Oldsouljer said:

---

There's white and then there's Nordic, and at Egypt's position on the globe, I do not see any need for those kind of heritable traits being in the royal bloodlines, if for no other reason than they'd need to be able to tan hard and deep at that latitude.

---

"I do not see" is your personal opinion, based on your theory of which kind of traits should exist on places on the earth, for whatever reason. It's not factual, and based in archaeological or historical evidence.

Even "orthodox" ethnologists say that the white/European peoples are "Caucasians", meaning that they originated from Caucasus Mountain region, just north of modern day Turkey, Iran, and Iraq. "Coincidentally", this is the "cradle of civilization", and of course the area where the the descendants of Adam and Eve are recorded as settling in the Bible. Abraham (the ancestor of Isaac and Jacob) is recorded to have lived in Ur of the Chaldees, which is located in modern-day southern Iraq, and was either a Sumerian or Babylonian city.

Modern-day white people or Europeans migrated into Europe roughly over the time period from around 500 BC to 1000 AD from Mesopotamia (modern day area of Iraq and Iran, land of Israel, etc), most of them traveling north over the Caucasus Mountains before going further north and west into Europe.

Yall know there is an ignore feature, right?

GP, I asked a couple reasonable questions much earlier in this thread, and you either chose to ignore them, or missed them. Would you mind giving them a look? Thanks!

I once lost a friend to falling off the edge of the earth. It's no joke guys. This stuff is super serious.

RIP Roger Dodger

MoCoWolf said:

---

GP, I asked a couple reasonable questions much earlier in this thread, and you either chose to ignore them, or missed them. Would you mind giving them a look? Thanks!

---

I'll take it as a "no". Thanks for playing I guess...

MoCoWolf said:

---

GP, I asked a couple reasonable questions much earlier in this thread, and you either chose to ignore them, or missed them. Would you mind giving them a look? Thanks!

---

The guy won't go out into his driveway on a sunny day to measure the height of the sun...you think he's gonna answer your questions? He's too busy "doing research" (ie: watching youtube channels served to him in his confirmation bias bubble).

MoCoWolf said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

GP, I asked a couple reasonable questions much earlier in this thread, and you either chose to ignore them, or missed them. Would you mind giving them a look? Thanks!

---

I'll take it as a "no". Thanks for playing I guess...

---

Thanks for starting this troll thread, I guess. I've played along with your silly questions enough haven't I?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

GP, I asked a couple reasonable questions much earlier in this thread, and you either chose to ignore them, or missed them. Would you mind giving them a look? Thanks!

---

I'll take it as a "no". Thanks for playing I guess...

---

Thanks for starting this troll thread, I guess. I've played along with your silly questions enough haven't I?

---

Why don't you post that little map of the flat earth of yours so that everybody can get at least one good, hard laugh again?!?

Please?!?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

I hate God? News to me. Guess all that time I spend in church is for nothing. Sad.

What if God created the Earth as a sphere?

---

The Bible clearly teaches that the earth is not only a flat plane, but also that it does not move and that it is fixed and immovable, and that it is the sun, moon and stars which move about the earth, and not the earth that moves.

Psalm 93:1 - "the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved"

Psalm 104:5 - "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved."


The entire reason that Luciferian Freemasons and Marxists in pseudo "academia" created the heliocentric theory, the globe earth theory, and later the hairbrained Big Bang theory and theory of evolution was as an attack on the Bible. They were trying to create this false idea that "science" has "disproved the Bible"...and therefore we cannot rely on the Bible for truth, and should also reject belief in God.

---

I love that we're taking scientific fact from a book written 2000+ years ago. Not only that, but from a book within that book, that is a collection of songs/poems written by humans. And then, we're taking those songs to be concrete evidence that folks knew more 2000+ years ago, and debating them on a website on the internet, using wireless technology, likely on a smartphone, haha.

If only they had thought to include some information about satellites and the internet when they wrote those songs/poems, we could have been much further along scientifically. Wonder if folks in the year 4024 are going to have a collection of Taylor Swift and Drake songs trying to explain how the world really is, and quoting Beyonce as to why "women should run the world."

smitt86 said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

I hate God? News to me. Guess all that time I spend in church is for nothing. Sad.

What if God created the Earth as a sphere?

---

The Bible clearly teaches that the earth is not only a flat plane, but also that it does not move and that it is fixed and immovable, and that it is the sun, moon and stars which move about the earth, and not the earth that moves.

Psalm 93:1 - "the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved"

Psalm 104:5 - "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved."


The entire reason that Luciferian Freemasons and Marxists in pseudo "academia" created the heliocentric theory, the globe earth theory, and later the hairbrained Big Bang theory and theory of evolution was as an attack on the Bible. They were trying to create this false idea that "science" has "disproved the Bible"...and therefore we cannot rely on the Bible for truth, and should also reject belief in God.

---

I love that we're taking scientific fact from a book written 2000+ years ago. Not only that, but from a book within that book, that is a collection of songs/poems written by humans. And then, we're taking those songs to be concrete evidence that folks knew more 2000+ years ago, and debating them on a website on the internet, using wireless technology, likely on a smartphone, haha.

If only they had thought to include some information about satellites and the internet when they wrote those songs/poems, we could have been much further along scientifically. Wonder if folks in the year 4024 are going to have a collection of Taylor Swift and Drake songs trying to explain how the world really is, and quoting Beyonce as to why "women should run the world."

---

Of course I understand that Leftists reject God's word as being divinely inspired truth.

I'm posting the passages of the Bible primarily for those people here in this forum who do believe that the Bible is God's inspired Word and truth.

Not for people like you.

GuerrillaPack said:

---

smitt86 said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

MoCoWolf said:

---

I hate God? News to me. Guess all that time I spend in church is for nothing. Sad.

What if God created the Earth as a sphere?

---

The Bible clearly teaches that the earth is not only a flat plane, but also that it does not move and that it is fixed and immovable, and that it is the sun, moon and stars which move about the earth, and not the earth that moves.

Psalm 93:1 - "the world also is stablished, that it cannot be moved"

Psalm 104:5 - "He set the earth on its foundations; it can never be moved."


The entire reason that Luciferian Freemasons and Marxists in pseudo "academia" created the heliocentric theory, the globe earth theory, and later the hairbrained Big Bang theory and theory of evolution was as an attack on the Bible. They were trying to create this false idea that "science" has "disproved the Bible"...and therefore we cannot rely on the Bible for truth, and should also reject belief in God.

---

I love that we're taking scientific fact from a book written 2000+ years ago. Not only that, but from a book within that book, that is a collection of songs/poems written by humans. And then, we're taking those songs to be concrete evidence that folks knew more 2000+ years ago, and debating them on a website on the internet, using wireless technology, likely on a smartphone, haha.

If only they had thought to include some information about satellites and the internet when they wrote those songs/poems, we could have been much further along scientifically. Wonder if folks in the year 4024 are going to have a collection of Taylor Swift and Drake songs trying to explain how the world really is, and quoting Beyonce as to why "women should run the world."

---

Of course I understand that Leftists reject God's word as being divinely inspired truth.

I'm posting the passages of the Bible primarily for those people here in this forum who do believe that the Bible is God's inspired Word and truth.

Not for people like you.

---

Does your church teach the flat earth?

grantwolf said:

---

Does your church teach the flat earth?

---

Does your church teach that drag queen story time is great for children and that murdering unborn children is a sacred human right?

GuerrillaPack said:

---

grantwolf said:

---

Does your church teach the flat earth?

---

Does your church teach that drag queen story time is great for children and that murdering unborn children is a sacred human right?

---

I'm gonna take that as a "no".

grantwolf said:

---

GuerrillaPack said:

---

grantwolf said:

---

Does your church teach the flat earth?

---

Does your church teach that drag queen story time is great for children and that murdering unborn children is a sacred human right?

---

I'm gonna take that as a "no".

---

So you don't have to answer my questions, but then you feign outrage and get on your high horse when I ignore your stupid questions.