Jussie Smollett case: Hoaxes, Lies, and False Flags are M.O. of Leftist Establishment

5,318 Views | 20 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by statefan91
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why did this guy have to stage and fake an "attack" on himself, and then why did the Leftist Establishment media promote and hype the hoax to the maximum, trying so hard to sell it to the pubic? Because you'd have to scour the entire country to try to find a real attack by Trump supporters against Leftists or anyone. It almost never happens. So what does the Left have to do in order to play the "victim"? They have have to stage or fake such an attack.

Meanwhile, there are thousands of cases of harassment and violent attacks (virtually daily) by Leftists against Trump supporters all over the country. Leftists believe that they have the "right" to silence Trump supporters and deny their free speech -- as their allies who run the Big Tech companies are doing.

What is even more significant is that Leftist officials in Chicago have let Smollett off scot free, and now Leftist groups and individuals are praising Smollett for what he has done, knowing that he faked the whole thing. Think about that. They are saying that it is good that he tried to perpetrate this hoax.

What is very important to take away from all of this is that use of these sort of hoaxes is the standard modus operandi of the Left and Establishment -- in order to implement all sorts of actions and policies, including starting wars, passing gun control, etc.

Look at all the illegal wars. The elites need a pretext in order to start the war. So they deliberately lie and cook up a hoax about "Iraqi weapons of mass destruction". Or, they provide chemical weapons to ISIS in Syria, have ISIS carry out a chemical attack, and then lie and blame it on the Assad regime. And the big enchilada...look at 9/11, and who really carried that out.

Remember the Tawana Brawley "rape" hoax and the Duke lacrosse "rape" hoax? Wonder why they perpetrated those hoaxes? Because FBI statistics show that there are virtually zero rapes of black women by white men in the entire United States, every year. Since it never happens, they have to hoax it. On the flip side, there are 10,000-15,000 rapes of white women by black men per year.

What about the elites/communists looking to ban guns? They like to use a school shooting or mass shooting of young children, for the maximum psychological effect. But since these rarely actually happen, they need to stage a real attack, or fake one.

How about preventing a conservative Supreme Court Justice from getting on the court? Pay and coerce several women to come forward with completely bogus "sexual assault" charges -- eg, Kavanaugh.

How about trying to impeach a conservative President? Completely fabricate a ridiculous hoax about that President being a puppet of Putin who is blackmailed because he pissed on Russian hookers in a Moscow hotel -- Trump.

They stage these hoaxes and then hype them endlessly in the Establishment media in order to manipulate peoples' emotions, and then generate a quick knee-jerk reaction to implement the policy or action that they desire -- eg, starting a war, banning guns, censorship of the internet, etc.
metcalfmafia
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do you change your profile picture so often?
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
metcalfmafia said:

Why do you change your profile picture so often?


I've been wondering that too
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Anyways, while there have been a few dozen fake hate crimes since Trump took office, there certainly have been many real accounts of Trump supporters turning to violence. Arguing otherwise is disingenuous at best.
But you're mentioning school shootings as hoaxes so nothing should surprise me. Yes the statistics are often greatly inflated but denying that major shootings have happened the last few years is the delusional.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IseWolf22 said:

Anyways, while there have been a few dozen fake hate crimes since Trump took office, there certainly have been many real accounts of Trump supporters turning to violence. Arguing otherwise is disingenuous at best.
But you're mentioning school shootings as hoaxes so nothing should surprise me. Yes the statistics are often greatly inflated but denying that major shootings have happened the last few years is the delusional.
Name one. Or two.

The only example I can think of is the one time that an anti-Trump protester got punched at a Trump rally back in 2016. But I don't know the whole story there. He may have been provoking the crowd or have initiated the violence himself.
PackBacker07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

IseWolf22 said:

Anyways, while there have been a few dozen fake hate crimes since Trump took office, there certainly have been many real accounts of Trump supporters turning to violence. Arguing otherwise is disingenuous at best.
But you're mentioning school shootings as hoaxes so nothing should surprise me. Yes the statistics are often greatly inflated but denying that major shootings have happened the last few years is the delusional.
Name one. Or two.

The only example I can think of is the one time that an anti-Trump protester got punched at a Trump rally back in 2016. But I don't know the whole story there. He may have been provoking the crowd or have initiated the violence himself.


Someone died in Charlottesville, but I'm guessing you have some unfounded, InfoWars conspiracy to tell us how it wasn't a far right-wing thing.
Y'all means ALL.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PackBacker07 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

IseWolf22 said:

Anyways, while there have been a few dozen fake hate crimes since Trump took office, there certainly have been many real accounts of Trump supporters turning to violence. Arguing otherwise is disingenuous at best.
But you're mentioning school shootings as hoaxes so nothing should surprise me. Yes the statistics are often greatly inflated but denying that major shootings have happened the last few years is the delusional.
Name one. Or two.

The only example I can think of is the one time that an anti-Trump protester got punched at a Trump rally back in 2016. But I don't know the whole story there. He may have been provoking the crowd or have initiated the violence himself.


Someone died in Charlottesville, but I'm guessing you have some unfounded, InfoWars conspiracy to tell us how it wasn't a far right-wing thing.
Oh, yes. The most important event of the last decade...perhaps even the most tragic event in all of history...the communist lamestream media would have us believe. The reason that all right-wing and conservative viewpoints must now be censored from the internet...right?

I made a whole thread on that incident, and explained/proved with evidence that it was an accident. There is video evidence that Antifa and other leftists were attacking his car immediately before the accident -- smashing the windows and hitting the car with rocks, baseball bats, etc. Also, a leftist professor at unc-ch admitted he was in Charlottesville carrying an AR-15 and that he intimidated the driver of that car. The driver most likely just panicked and hit the accelerator to get away from being attacked, and may have even feared for his life.

Here is that thread: https://insidepacksports.com/forums/4/topics/7538
statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You proved it was an accident? His defense team could've used your help then - https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/driver-deadly-car-attack-charlottesville-white-nationalist-rally-pleads-guilty-n987961

Hopefully you're working with the Justice Project to help get him exonerated!!
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

You proved it was an accident? His defense team could've used your help then - https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/driver-deadly-car-attack-charlottesville-white-nationalist-rally-pleads-guilty-n987961

Hopefully you're working with the Justice Project to help get him exonerated!!
So the court system is infallible? They don't make mistakes? They are never biased? Innocent people are never convicted?

lmao

This case is also now heavily politicized. He could never probably get a fair trial to begin with. The leftist-dominated judiciary will never allow him to get a fair hearing. They have too much "political capital" invested in having him convicted, and using this incident as some kind of "atrocity" (almost a new "holocaust") to demonize the right with.
statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is the leftist dominated judiciary?
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

Who is the leftist dominated judiciary?


Speaking from experience, just let him start threads and post to himself. He couldn't care less about what anyone says unless they agree 1000% with him. Just let him post to himself. Again, speaking from experience.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

statefan91 said:

Who is the leftist dominated judiciary?


Speaking from experience, just let him start threads and post to himself. He couldn't care less about what anyone says unless they agree 1000% with him. Just let him post to himself. Again, speaking from experience.


No, I most certainly do care about others' thoughts. I heavily engage in back-and-forth debate with those who disagree with me. You know that is true.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

Who is the leftist dominated judiciary?


The judiciary system all over this nation who have discovered the "right" to Sodomite "marriage" in state/federal constitutions, and are otherwise basically completely on board with the communist/leftist agenda.
statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do you think a secular government should have a law that prevents two consenting adults from forming a legal union?
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

Why do you think a secular government should have a law that prevents two consenting adults from forming a legal union?


I don't believe in a secular government. You cannot even have laws without God. A "law", by definition, is an absolute standard of morality that cannot change. Man cannot establish a law. All man can do is give his opinion. Man-made governments are rule of the majority or by who has the most power -- with the "laws" constantly changing.

And the U.S. government is ultimately founded upon God's law. The Declaration of Independence explicitly states that the purpose of government is to protect our rights which were "endowed by our Creator".

God gave us the perfect laws and form of government -- i.e., the initial government of the Israelites under the "system of the judges".

God's law says that homosexuality is a crime punishable by death. Do you claim to know better than God?
statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not sure I follow you - are you saying we should have laws that align to Christianity?
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

Not sure I follow you - are you saying we should have laws that align to Christianity?

Absolutely.

What I'm saying is that you can't even have laws without a power higher than man. A "law", by definition, is an absolute standard that cannot change. Man can't establish an absolute standard -- they have differing opinions, and their group opinions on ethical matters change over time.

If God did not exist, and man was the "highest power" in the world, then how could you say that murder or stealing is wrong? According to the theory of evolution and without God, we should all be engaging in a "survival of the fittest" struggle -- in which we can "rightfully" kill or steal from others in order to survive.

If, hypothetically, there is no God, then you are only left with the opinions of man. Some people might think, for example, that murder and stealing is wrong. But others might disagree. And then who's to say who's opinion is right? That's why "secular" man-made governments now mostly use a tyranny of the majority in order to decide upon laws.

Yet we all should agree that things like murder and stealing should ALWAYS be illegal and wrong, for all time -- regardless if man-made governments should at some point in time decide in the future that murder and stealing should be allowed. By the way, they already have done that -- ie, with abortion and socialist taxation and "wealth redistribution".

Our traditional ethical/moral code in the Western world that has existed for thousands of years is based in the laws of the Bible -- eg, laws against murder, stealing, adultery, etc.

The people that founded the United States were, overwhelmingly, deeply religious Christians. In drafting the original state constitutions and legal codes, they heavily based the law on the laws of God. This is why, for example, sodomy was a crime in virtually every state of the United States up until the 1970s/80s, and in many states all the way up until 2003 when the Supreme Court unconstitutionally overturned those laws. There were also laws in virtually every state on dress codes for men and women, and laws against public nakedness (indecent exposure) -- which are clearly based on the Old Testament laws of God.

statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

statefan91 said:

Not sure I follow you - are you saying we should have laws that align to Christianity?

Yet we all should agree that things like murder and stealing should ALWAYS be illegal and wrong, for all time -- regardless if man-made governments should at some point in time decide in the future that murder and stealing should be allowed. By the way, they already have done that -- ie, with abortion and socialist taxation and "wealth redistribution".

Our traditional ethical/moral code in the Western world that has existed for thousands of years is based in the laws of the Bible -- eg, laws against murder, stealing, adultery, etc.

The people that founded the United States were, overwhelmingly, deeply religious Christians. In drafting the original state constitutions and legal codes, they heavily based the law on the laws of God. This is why, for example, sodomy was a crime in virtually every state of the United States up until the 1970s/80s, and in many states all the way up until 2003 when the Supreme Court unconstitutionally overturned those laws. There were also laws in virtually every state on dress codes for men and women, and laws against public nakedness (indecent exposure) -- which are clearly based on the Old Testament laws of God.
Can you clarify on what you're saying about stealing and how that equates to socialist taxation and wealth redistribution? Are you saying that if we had laws based on Jesus' teachings, we wouldn't have taxes?
statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd love to get more clarification on the above ^
PackBacker07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

statefan91 said:

Not sure I follow you - are you saying we should have laws that align to Christianity?

Yet we all should agree that things like murder and stealing should ALWAYS be illegal and wrong, for all time -- regardless if man-made governments should at some point in time decide in the future that murder and stealing should be allowed. By the way, they already have done that -- ie, with abortion and socialist taxation and "wealth redistribution".

Our traditional ethical/moral code in the Western world that has existed for thousands of years is based in the laws of the Bible -- eg, laws against murder, stealing, adultery, etc.

The people that founded the United States were, overwhelmingly, deeply religious Christians. In drafting the original state constitutions and legal codes, they heavily based the law on the laws of God. This is why, for example, sodomy was a crime in virtually every state of the United States up until the 1970s/80s, and in many states all the way up until 2003 when the Supreme Court unconstitutionally overturned those laws. There were also laws in virtually every state on dress codes for men and women, and laws against public nakedness (indecent exposure) -- which are clearly based on the Old Testament laws of God.
Can you clarify on what you're saying about stealing and how that equates to socialist taxation and wealth redistribution? Are you saying that if we had laws based on Jesus' teachings, we wouldn't have taxes?


I'm sure it's a talking point he saw on Zero Hedge or something.
Y'all means ALL.
PackBacker07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

PackBacker07 said:

GuerrillaPack said:

IseWolf22 said:

Anyways, while there have been a few dozen fake hate crimes since Trump took office, there certainly have been many real accounts of Trump supporters turning to violence. Arguing otherwise is disingenuous at best.
But you're mentioning school shootings as hoaxes so nothing should surprise me. Yes the statistics are often greatly inflated but denying that major shootings have happened the last few years is the delusional.
Name one. Or two.

The only example I can think of is the one time that an anti-Trump protester got punched at a Trump rally back in 2016. But I don't know the whole story there. He may have been provoking the crowd or have initiated the violence himself.


Someone died in Charlottesville, but I'm guessing you have some unfounded, InfoWars conspiracy to tell us how it wasn't a far right-wing thing.
Oh, yes. The most important event of the last decade...perhaps even the most tragic event in all of history...the communist lamestream media would have us believe. The reason that all right-wing and conservative viewpoints must now be censored from the internet...right?

I made a whole thread on that incident, and explained/proved with evidence that it was an accident. There is video evidence that Antifa and other leftists were attacking his car immediately before the accident -- smashing the windows and hitting the car with rocks, baseball bats, etc. Also, a leftist professor at unc-ch admitted he was in Charlottesville carrying an AR-15 and that he intimidated the driver of that car. The driver most likely just panicked and hit the accelerator to get away from being attacked, and may have even feared for his life.

Here is that thread: https://insidepacksports.com/forums/4/topics/7538


So I was correct. Thank you for the confirmation. Thoughts and prayers to the true victim here, the Neo-Nazi who got scared and accidentally ran into a crowded street. I hope his Tiki torch survived the rough run-in with the body of the woman who was killed. Unfortunate she was in the way and he couldn't get to his intended destination.
statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

I'd love to get more clarification on the above ^
Hi guerrilapack can you please clarify on your comments I asked about above?
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.