Next Season

2,977 Views | 42 Replies | Last: 40 min ago by CLTWolf
EthanBarry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
Rett in center, Ryan at short, Nance on Friday's. Everything else needs to be reset, but that's an excellent starting point if you can keep them. I think there's optimism about keeping Nance. I'm expecting 7-8 draft picks: Head, Sherm, McHugh, Wiggins, Nixon, Marohn, Dudan, Consiglio. Keeping an eye on what happens at PC too
kmb717
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Serrano at 2nd or 3rd?
EthanBarry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
I would guess third strictly based on his body type but that's a guess
wolfgators
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EthanBarry said:

Keeping an eye on what happens at PC too


Ah pitching coach
gabeezzell04
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EthanBarry said:

Rett in center, Ryan at short, Nance on Friday's. Everything else needs to be reset, but that's an excellent starting point if you can keep them. I think there's optimism about keeping Nance. I'm expecting 7-8 draft picks: Head, Sherm, McHugh, Wiggins, Nixon, Marohn, Dudan, Consiglio. Keeping an eye on what happens at PC too


You think that rumor about Sogard is even slightly legitimate?
Wolfpack91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gabeezzell04 said:

EthanBarry said:

Rett in center, Ryan at short, Nance on Friday's. Everything else needs to be reset, but that's an excellent starting point if you can keep them. I think there's optimism about keeping Nance. I'm expecting 7-8 draft picks: Head, Sherm, McHugh, Wiggins, Nixon, Marohn, Dudan, Consiglio. Keeping an eye on what happens at PC too


You think that rumor about Sogard is even slightly legitimate?


What rumor?
Redwolf55
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rumor-

He leaves Wright State to become an assistant coach at State and the team comes together.

He is in a better spot now why would he leave to join this fun?
pack2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wolfpack91 said:

gabeezzell04 said:

EthanBarry said:

Rett in center, Ryan at short, Nance on Friday's. Everything else needs to be reset, but that's an excellent starting point if you can keep them. I think there's optimism about keeping Nance. I'm expecting 7-8 draft picks: Head, Sherm, McHugh, Wiggins, Nixon, Marohn, Dudan, Consiglio. Keeping an eye on what happens at PC too


You think that rumor about Sogard is even slightly legitimate?


What rumor?


TheWhiteWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chrysler can't be retained he's ruined several guys
getwicked
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The pitching staff was a mess this year independent of JD and RM.
wolfgators
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the staff needs a shake up or it is more of the same
EthanBarry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
I don't know if Sogard will come or not but financially it's possible. I've heard of the possibility of a move independent of him as well. We'll see, I like Chrysler personally but I get it's probably run its course
pack2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EthanBarry said:

I don't know if Sogard will come or not but financially it's possible. I've heard of the possibility of a move independent of him as well. We'll see, I like Chrysler personally but I get it's probably run its course


Glad you have finally come around. Too many years of (below) average pitching to keep it up. His best year was his 1st year. Usually not a good sign
PGAWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EthanBarry said:

Rett in center, Ryan at short, Nance on Friday's. Everything else needs to be reset, but that's an excellent starting point if you can keep them. I think there's optimism about keeping Nance. I'm expecting 7-8 draft picks: Head, Sherm, McHugh, Wiggins, Nixon, Marohn, Dudan, Consiglio. Keeping an eye on what happens at PC too


Wonder what the odds are you could get one or two of those guys back.

Most guys that are drafted go. Will be curious to see how 5for5 changes things
wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfgators said:

I think the staff needs a shake up or it is more of the same


More of the same? Being one of the best teams in the country year in and year out, making the post season at a ninety percent clip, going to the CWS, putting guys in the pros? The horror!
Wise men speak because they have something to say. Fools speak because they have to say something

346
kmb717
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DeCarlo at Catcher next year looks solid.
JCooke93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Or Outfielder
JCooke93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please
JCooke93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Agree
wolfgators
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf said:

wolfgators said:

I think the staff needs a shake up or it is more of the same


More of the same? Being one of the best teams in the country year in and year out, making the post season at a ninety percent clip, going to the CWS, putting guys in the pros? The horror!



More of the same of not winning a big game when the opportunity is there. And I get it, college World Series,…
ClePack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wolfgators said:

I think the staff needs a shake up or it is more of the same


Bingo. Avent was awesome for us and the school, but this program needs new blood BADLY. Game passed him by a few seasons ago. Can't keep running it back like this. We need some kind of infusion of new energy and strategy
pack2010
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ethan- I believe you said somewhere, before Hart was hired, you had heard/seen some names that intrigued you when it comes to who could replace Avent. Can you share those names? FWIW I am very cool with it being Hart, think he will do well, but just curious.
Pack31
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf said:

wolfgators said:

I think the staff needs a shake up or it is more of the same


More of the same? Being one of the best teams in the country year in and year out, making the post season at a ninety percent clip, going to the CWS, putting guys in the pros? The horror!
brother you cant teach baby's
poexcuse
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EthanBarry said:

Rett in center, Ryan at short, Nance on Friday's. Everything else needs to be reset, but that's an excellent starting point if you can keep them. I think there's optimism about keeping Nance. I'm expecting 7-8 draft picks: Head, Sherm, McHugh, Wiggins, Nixon, Marohn, Dudan, Consiglio. Keeping an eye on what happens at PC too

Remember to use the Ghost Busters flashlight to forget the Post season mess by all those guys.
Find joy …respect the athletes.
TraCha4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think Chrysler needs to go. We need a reset there.
EthanBarry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
pack2010 said:

Ethan- I believe you said somewhere, before Hart was hired, you had heard/seen some names that intrigued you when it comes to who could replace Avent. Can you share those names? FWIW I am very cool with it being Hart, think he will do well, but just curious.


Fitzgerald and Haire
EthanBarry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
I don't have Chrysler numbers in front of my but the quality of arm and depth of them is head and shoulders what we've ever had. Avent had one trip to Omaha pre-Chrysler, with Rodon, two trips with him carried by a bunch of pitchability righties and mega stuff in the pen between Justice, Villaman, Dudan, Smith. They've had real prospects yearly: Swiney, Justice, Villaman, Fritton, etc. I don't think anybody knows how many or which strings Avent pulls compared to Chrysler, which is the main complaint. But as far as I can tell, a lot of the things we don't like pre-dated Chrysler
Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Feel pretty confident Bo and JT return. There is some legit smoke about the Sogard rumors It's Harts team now.
“In America, anyone can become president. That's the problem.”
- George Carlin



JCooke93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Please
PGAWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EthanBarry said:

I don't have Chrysler numbers in front of my but the quality of arm and depth of them is head and shoulders what we've ever had. Avent had one trip to Omaha pre-Chrysler, with Rodon, two trips with him carried by a bunch of pitchability righties and mega stuff in the pen between Justice, Villaman, Dudan, Smith. They've had real prospects yearly: Swiney, Justice, Villaman, Fritton, etc. I don't think anybody knows how many or which strings Avent pulls compared to Chrysler, which is the main complaint. But as far as I can tell, a lot of the things we don't like pre-dated Chrysler


Absolutely agree with what you're saying and for the record I am indifferent on Chrysler. Before this year I was a fan of his. If Sogard is an option obviously would prefer that for multiple reasons.

Just to make counter argument because I love talking baseball. Velocity and stuff is up across baseball in general.

My problems this with Chrysler this year start with you have so many guys with legit stuff and you couldn't turn one of them into a competent bullpen arm. Kitchings, Manuel, Black, JP, Heintz, Ragusa, Hemric, Garino

Not to mention the lack of progression from Consiglio and Heath Andrews who both are extremely talented.

I usually blame the players first but with this many talented guys and not one developed over the course of the year, it raises eyebrows.
ICW Wolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PGAWolf said:

EthanBarry said:

I don't have Chrysler numbers in front of my but the quality of arm and depth of them is head and shoulders what we've ever had. Avent had one trip to Omaha pre-Chrysler, with Rodon, two trips with him carried by a bunch of pitchability righties and mega stuff in the pen between Justice, Villaman, Dudan, Smith. They've had real prospects yearly: Swiney, Justice, Villaman, Fritton, etc. I don't think anybody knows how many or which strings Avent pulls compared to Chrysler, which is the main complaint. But as far as I can tell, a lot of the things we don't like pre-dated Chrysler


Absolutely agree with what you're saying and for the record I am indifferent on Chrysler. Before this year I was a fan of his. If Sogard is an option obviously would prefer that for multiple reasons.

Just to make counter argument because I love talking baseball. Velocity and stuff is up across baseball in general.

My problems this with Chrysler this year start with you have so many guys with legit stuff and you couldn't turn one of them into a competent bullpen arm. Kitchings, Manuel, Black, JP, Heintz, Ragusa, Hemric, Garino

Not to mention the lack of progression from Consiglio and Heath Andrews who both are extremely talented.

I usually blame the players first but with this many talented guys and not one developed over the course of the year, it raises eyebrows.


Most of those guys you mention above have command issues. It starts with recruiting. We have to do a better job of identifying the right guys. 96 doesn't mean **** if you can't command the baseball. In fact college hitters could give a **** in general about velo. It is about stuff. Like Ben McDonald talked about all weekend. It is what makes you different. What do you do differently. 2 of the dudes Carolina throw out there in McDuffie and Decaro command it and have elite change ups. Most of our guys have stock stuff with a lack of
Command.
PGAWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ICW Wolf said:

PGAWolf said:

EthanBarry said:

I don't have Chrysler numbers in front of my but the quality of arm and depth of them is head and shoulders what we've ever had. Avent had one trip to Omaha pre-Chrysler, with Rodon, two trips with him carried by a bunch of pitchability righties and mega stuff in the pen between Justice, Villaman, Dudan, Smith. They've had real prospects yearly: Swiney, Justice, Villaman, Fritton, etc. I don't think anybody knows how many or which strings Avent pulls compared to Chrysler, which is the main complaint. But as far as I can tell, a lot of the things we don't like pre-dated Chrysler


Absolutely agree with what you're saying and for the record I am indifferent on Chrysler. Before this year I was a fan of his. If Sogard is an option obviously would prefer that for multiple reasons.

Just to make counter argument because I love talking baseball. Velocity and stuff is up across baseball in general.

My problems this with Chrysler this year start with you have so many guys with legit stuff and you couldn't turn one of them into a competent bullpen arm. Kitchings, Manuel, Black, JP, Heintz, Ragusa, Hemric, Garino

Not to mention the lack of progression from Consiglio and Heath Andrews who both are extremely talented.

I usually blame the players first but with this many talented guys and not one developed over the course of the year, it raises eyebrows.


Most of those guys you mention above have command issues. It starts with recruiting. We have to do a better job of identifying the right guys. 96 doesn't mean **** if you can't command the baseball. In fact college hitters could give a **** in general about velo. It is about stuff. Like Ben McDonald talked about all weekend. It is what makes you different. What do you do differently. 2 of the dudes Carolina throw out there in McDuffie and Decaro command it and have elite change ups. Most of our guys have stock stuff with a lack of
Command.


Most high school guys don't come in with elite change ups. They don't need it in high school. If they have stuff, command, and multiple pitches they aren't stepping foot on campus.

I have no problem taking stuff and trying to develop it. But that's the key development.
JCooke93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also fire the trainer please
JCooke93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Exactly
PGAWolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just went and read the perfect game write up on those Carolina pitchers

Glauder- 89-91, primary secondary pitch is a flat sweeper (not good), and would occasionally throw a change up to left handed hitters.

Mcduffie was so low rated he didn't have a write up or even a grade by PG.


Decaro was rated 8.5 by PG. Not great.
Page 1 of 2
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.