April 19, 1995

Many people think that people like myself (who they smear as "conspiracy theorists", parroting the commie Establishment brainwashing) are just "crazy for no reason" and are "dreaming things up out of thin air".

Do you really want to know what causes a person to become a so-called "conspiracy theorist"? Then take just 4 minutes out of your day and watch this video. It's because we've seen evidence (that other people have yet to see) like this video below, with local news reports right after the OKC bombing talking about two unexploded bombs INSIDE the Murrah Federal Building in Oklahoma City.

A person usually becomes a "conspiracy theorist" upon "waking up" on a particular issue -- ie, discovering some bombshell information/truth about a particularly important event or issue, which often "shatters" their faith in the Establishment, leading them to question the validity of much of the Establishment worldview. The 1995 Oklahoma City Bombing is one of those events that has woken up millions of people.

The fertilizer bomb that per the "official story" caused the building to partially collapse was located in a truck across the street from the Murrah Building. It could not have caused the damage that occurred to the Murrah Building. There must have been bombs located inside the building on the structural columns. And then you have local news reporting on these other (at least two) unexploded bombs that were discovered inside the building that failed to detonate. Of course, these unexploded bombs were only talked about for a short time after the bombing, and then sort of "brushed under the rug" as the Feds took over the cover-up fake "investigation", and the "official story" was conditioned into peoples' minds that "there was only ONE bomb, the truck bomb".

Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols were just patsies (similar to Lee Harvey Oswald). The bombing was carried out by (or with complicity of) criminal elements within our government. There were ATF offices inside this building and all ATF agents were "coincidentally" absent from the building when the bombing occurred (demonstrating prior knowledge).

There is much, much more evidence to add to this story...which I will plan to add to the thread.

In thinking right now of some of the best presentations & documentaries on this subject, off the top of my head I remembered a presentation (and published paper) done by this General Ben Partin, who was one of the top weapons experts in the United States military (Air Force). This is one of the very best and authoritative presentations by a "whistleblower" exposing the truth about the Oklahoma City bombing. I had initially watched it about 20 years ago, and it took a few minutes to find it on YouTube -- obviously because Google/YouTube have rigged their search algorithms to make it much more difficult to find anti-Establishment information. This video was uploaded to YouTube 14 years ago.

I just now looked up this man's biography. I don't know if I forgot this (or never knew), but this man was born in Lumberton, North Carolina and graduated with a degree in chemical engineering from NC State in 1949. He later had a long military career, including as a pilot (not in direct combat) in the Air Force during the Korean War. Later, in the 1950s, Partin worked as a project manager on ballistic missile development for the Air Force and Army, and eventually became the assistant for advanced weapons concepts at Andrews Air Force Base, Md. Per his bio (below), "He was assigned in March 1964 to the Deputy Chief of Staff, Research and Development, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, with duty as a staff development engineer in the Directorate of Development. He participated in the establishment of the Armament Systems Division and formulation of the accelerated ordnance program."

This man was one of the U.S. Military's very top experts on explosives.

Brigadier General Benton K. Partin Biography:
https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/106051/brigadier-general-benton-k-partin/


Here in this presentation, Partin lays it all out how the "official story" on the 1995 Oklahoma City bombing (of a fertilizer bomb located across the street from the building in a truck) is impossible, and that there must have been explosives placed on the structural columns inside the building.

Ben Partin testified at some of the trials on the OKC bombing, including the trial of alleged "co-conspirator" Terry Nichols, per this Denver Post article (from 1997 apparently, when Nichols went to trial).

At the time, it was widely known and discussed that the "official story" was being questioned, with public allegations of a government cover-up -- as evidenced by it being mentioned in this article, covering Partin's view. The article also discusses the allegations that the ATF had prior knowledge of the bombing.

https://extras.denverpost.com/bomb/bomb361.htm

Quote:

---

In Oklahoma City, a retired Air Force general who contends the Oklahoma City bombing involved more than one explosive device testified Wednesday before a grand jury investigating allegations of a government coverup.

Retired Brig. Gen. Benton K. Partin challenged the government's contention that the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building was gutted by one Ryder rental truck packed with ammonium nitrate fertilizer, fuel and other explosives.

"My conclusions still were there had to have been demolition charges in the building," Partin said as he left after nearly a full day of testimony. "The so-called 4,000 pounds of ammonium nitrate and fuel oil could not possibly have done the damage."

But Linda Jones, a British bomb expert who testified at convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh's trial, said the damage was consistent with an ammonium nitrate-fuel oil bomb.

Partin's 1995 report on the bombing concludes that explosives were placed "at four critical junctures on supporting columns within the building." Basing his conclusion on an estimate of the blast velocity of ammonium nitrate-based explosives, he said the truck bomb would not have been powerful enough to destroy the building's concrete pillars.

Jones said the blast velocity of ammonium nitrate fertilizer varies with the booster used to detonate it.
Some grand-jury advocates believe the truck bomb may have set off a secret cache of explosives in the offices of the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. They also believe the ATF had prior knowledge of the bombing. The ATF denies the existence of such a cache and any advance knowledge of the attack.

The grand jury was impaneled June 30 after a petition drive by state Rep. Charles Key, R-Oklahoma City, and Glenn Wilburn, an Oklahoma City accountant whose two young grandsons were killed in the blast. Wilburn died of cancer shortly after the panel convened.

In addition to the allegations of a coverup, the two men contended that federal prosecutors overlooked a larger conspiracy in the bombing, which killed 168 people.

---

Two quick notes on the motive and method for the OKC bombing false flag:

1. The motive/purpose of the false flag was to lay the groundwork for a "police state" agenda, and pass laws that begin to erode civil liberties and the Bill of Rights -- with the passage of the federal "Antiterrorism Act of 1996" in response to the bombing, which eroded due process rights among other things. Also, it was to demonize and attack the growing "militia movement" within the United States, and other associated right-wing movements - for example, the "Christian Identity" movement -- eg, by using the patsy Timothy McVeigh and tying him to Elohim City ("Christian Identity" community) and other right-wing groups and ideologies.

2. Note the similarity to the 9/11 false flag. In 9/11, the twin towers and WTC Building #7 were actually brought down via explosives placed inside the buildings (on the structural columns), in controlled demolitions. In carrying out a false flag, in order to better frame a patsy they use a "diversionary false cause" of the attack -- ie, the plane crashes on 9/11, and the fertilizer truck bomb in Oklahoma City. This is because if the true source/cause of the attack is exposed (and then pursued via investigation), it is more likely to lead to the true perpetrators of the attack (ie, the criminal networks associated with the government). Therefore, when carrying out the false flag, they cover up the true source/cause of the crime (bombs within the buildings both on 9/11 and in the OKC bombing), and focus on the "diversionary cause" (planes, the fertilizer truck bomb), so that only that diversion is investigated, which will lead back to their framed patsy (McVeigh, the mythical "muslim hijackers").

GuerrillaPack said:

---

2. Note the similarity to the 9/11 false flag. In 9/11, the twin towers and WTC Building #7 were actually brought down via explosives placed inside the buildings (on the structural columns), in controlled demolitions. In carrying out a false flag, in order to better frame a patsy they use a "diversionary false cause" of the attack -- ie, the plane crashes on 9/11, and the fertilizer truck bomb in Oklahoma City. This is because if the true source/cause of the attack is exposed (and then pursued via investigation), it is more likely to lead to the true perpetrators of the attack (ie, the criminal networks associated with the government). Therefore, when carrying out the false flag, they cover up the true source/cause of the crime (bombs within the buildings both on 9/11 and in the OKC bombing), and focus on the "diversionary cause" (planes, the fertilizer truck bomb), so that only that diversion is investigated, which will lead back to their framed patsy (McVeigh, the mythical "muslim hijackers").

---

Same "diversionary false cause" tactic was also used in the JFK assassination. The REAL shooter(s) that killed JFK were located on the "grassy knoll", with the kill shot(s) coming from in front of JFK (see the Zapruder film showing JFK's head being shot from the front and being knocked to the back and left upon impact of the bullet).

So the criminals in the government concoct an "official story" just brushes under the rug the BLATANTLY CLEAR evidence of shots coming from in front of JFK and on the "grassy knoll" area, and pretends like that all doesn't exist. And then just focuses on the "diversionary false cause", with the lies about it being Lee Harvey Oswald up in a building behind JFK. In reality, Oswald probably wasn't even up in that building and wasn't a shooter at all.

This all shows how easy it is to completely fool a subset of the general public, even if the evidence disproving the "official story" is SO INCREDIBLY OBVIOUS and CLEAR. With the JFK assassination, the evidence is so incredibly conclusive and blatantly obvious that shot(s) came from in front of JFK that killed him. And with the OKC bombing and 9/11, it is also INCREDIBLY OBVIOUS and CLEAR from the evidence that there were bombs within the Murrah Federal Building and the WTC towers. However, many in the general public are just too easily fooled, cannot think critically, and don't think to question the official story and/or are too lazy to investigate for themselves.

On Timothy McVeigh....many of you who are familiar with the OKC bombing may recall that there was solid evidence of other accomplices seen with or connected to McVeigh around the time of the bombing, and particularly one referred to as "John Doe #2". Yet, suspiciously, these accomplices were not pursued by the government.

This is typical with these government black ops and false flags and their patsies. The government always makes it out as if it is a "lone gunman" or "lone nut" who is the "mastermind" and "solely responsible"....such as with Lee Harvey Oswald, etc. This way, it's easier to "tie up" the "official story". Because if they expose and "investigate" all the other people associated with the patsy, it will obviously ultimately lead back to all of his government handlers/accomplices.

There is evidence that McVeigh had CIA connections, and may have even been under "MK ultra" type mind control. Reportedly, one of the first people to visit McVeigh in prison was a top government agent involved in the MK Ultra program (or equivalent program, as "MK Ultra" was no longer the official government name for the program at that time).

In searching for more about McVeigh this morning, I just found the following video (that was uploaded to YouTube 15 years ago). The video mentions a letter written by McVeigh (and published by the NY Times) in which McVeigh says that he was recruited by the CIA out of Ft Bragg "for domestic covert operations". The video also covers that McVeigh was filmed being at a U.S. military base that specialized in training soldiers for use of explosives, a little over a year after he officially was discharged from the Army.

Here is a link to this NY Times article containing excerpts of the letter written by McVeigh to his sister. I used archive.org, to avoid the paywall on the NY Times website:

https://web.archive.org/web/20200515020147/https://www.nytimes.com/1998/07/01/us/excerpts-from-timothy-mcveigh-letter.html

Quote:

---

Now here's what led to my current life: It all revolves around my arrival at Ft. Bragg for Special Forces. We all took intelligence, psychological, adeptness, and a whole battery of other tests. (Out of a group of 400). One day in formation, ten (10) Social Security numbers were called out (no names) and told to leave formation. Mine was one.

The 10 of us were told that out of the select group of 400, we had scored highest on certain tests. We had been selected because of our intelligence, physical make-up (165 lbs. 6 ft. being ''ultimate warrier'' type -- I was only slightly off -- 160 lbs. 6'1 1/2''), and physical abilities. We were to feel special, part of a hand-picked group). . . .

We were all asked to ''volunteer'' (talk about peer pressure!) to do some ''work for the government on the domestic, as well as international, front.'' . . .

What I learned next, both from the briefings, and from the questions and private talks included:

1.) We would be helping the CIA fly drugs into the U.S. to fund many covert operations;
2.) Military ''consultants'' were to work hand-in-hand w/civilian police agencies to ''quiet'' anyone whom was deemed a ''security risk.'' (We would be gov't-paid assassins!)
3.)Many other details -- to verify these last two, see the enclosed article, or watch, again the movie ''Lethal Weapon''. . . .

It also gives you new insight on things like WACO, etc. -- they were murdered by hit-men.

---

The video also includes a clip from a ABC news report of an eyewitness who was personally told by an ATF official that "ATF agents working in the building had been told in advance not to come to work".