Trump won by 5.5 points in Arizona. That's enough to cover any split voting. Add in the significant delay, that certainly makes things suspicious.Civilized said:Oldsouljer said:She seems to have something to loudly complain about as do we all. Ridiculously long decision times on the vote, just for starters. As for the courts, don't depend on them to defend election integrity. Just ask the State of Texas about back in 2020 when they tried to get the USSC to do something about states which wouldn't strictly uphold their own election laws.hokiewolf said:
We don't think Kari Lake was a terrible polarizing candidate? She's now lost twice for a seat that could have easily gone Republican. That seems like the most logical reason, seeings how there has been zero proof of election interference other than her loudly complaining and losing in court.
Then who should we depend on to defend election integrity? Dinesh D'Souza?
Social media randos doing their own research?
Of course we should depend on the courts. You may not think it's perfect but it's way better than the other options, especially when it comes to being forced to actually bring evidence instead of posturing and whining and grifting.
Do you think there was consequential, result-altering fraud in the 2024 election?
Also, look at the 2020 mastermind (Mark Elias) in Pennsylvania on the 2024 Senate election. Even though, McCormack was finally included to the Senate invitation, I still think there is a reasonable chance McCormack will not be seated…