I agree. Fortunately, for me, my daughters both are in the field in which they received their diploma...Wufpack17 said:caryking said:You can say the same about highly educated people…. Typically, they are the most low information voter, as far as I'm concerned…Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Civilized said:Gulfstream4 said:Wufpack17 said:I still don't know how he's "existential threat to democracy"?Gulfstream4 said:packgrad said:
More toning it down.Days after an attempted assassination, Biden is back to calling Trump a “danger to the country.”
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) July 15, 2024
So much for that whole “toning down the rhetoric” thing.
pic.twitter.com/7DvTBZ1d6w
Biden can't run on his record. All he can do is TDS and hope the low information democrat voter laps it up.
He already lost an election and moved out of the white house once before.
Not agreeing with results doesn't make someone a threat to democracy.
Got to keep the low information voters on board?
We can give the low information voter thing a rest.
Trump gets crushed at the polls if not for low information voters that are the cornerstone of his base. His ability to cleave away from the Democratic Party non-college-educated white voters has been more consequential to his electoral success than any other demographic, and it's not even close.
"Non-college-educated" does not necessarily mean low information. I understand how the typical smug liberal looks down on others. Har-har.
That's so obvious you don't even need to point it out.
Not all non-educated voters are low information voters. But low info voters correlate very strongly with education level, as does news consumption.
But you know that already.
I have no idea what a college education has to do with intelligence. Hell, I'd argue anyone wasting resources on most of these college degrees, aren't very intelligent. But hey, they have a diploma!