Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
Yep…Oldsouljer said:Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
caryking said:Yep…Oldsouljer said:Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
The answer to the question is simple…. I'm still looking for Civ to comment…
Civ, you will not agree with this and you will provide data that isn't relevant; however, I'll go...Civilized said:caryking said:Yep…Oldsouljer said:Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
The answer to the question is simple…. I'm still looking for Civ to comment…
Why are we playing games here?
The President has very little to do with either.
If you think that's wrong, explain what policies Trump or any other President implemented that had significant effect on either.
caryking said:Civ, you will not agree with this and you will provide data that isn't relevant; however, I'll go...Civilized said:caryking said:Yep…Oldsouljer said:Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
The answer to the question is simple…. I'm still looking for Civ to comment…
Why are we playing games here?
The President has very little to do with either.
If you think that's wrong, explain what policies Trump or any other President implemented that had significant effect on either.
Biden absolutely has slowed our energy production. You will show things, like leases, etc... that said, production is down in the US, by our domestic drillers.
Biden signed bills into Law that have negatively affected our deficit that turns in debt. Printed money has caused significant inflation; therefore, that's how he has affected things. Now, I don't blame him alone as it took, both Pubs and Dems, to create these bills (except a "BIG" few since he's been office) that he signed into law.
Biden hasn't shown any restraint on signing bills...
A couple of thoughts:Civilized said:caryking said:Civ, you will not agree with this and you will provide data that isn't relevant; however, I'll go...Civilized said:caryking said:Yep…Oldsouljer said:Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
The answer to the question is simple…. I'm still looking for Civ to comment…
Why are we playing games here?
The President has very little to do with either.
If you think that's wrong, explain what policies Trump or any other President implemented that had significant effect on either.
Biden absolutely has slowed our energy production. You will show things, like leases, etc... that said, production is down in the US, by our domestic drillers.
Biden signed bills into Law that have negatively affected our deficit that turns in debt. Printed money has caused significant inflation; therefore, that's how he has affected things. Now, I don't blame him alone as it took, both Pubs and Dems, to create these bills (except a "BIG" few since he's been office) that he signed into law.
Biden hasn't shown any restraint on signing bills...
US oil production dipped sharply during COVID and has ramped back up and now exceeds pre-COVID production. Where is the evidence of consequential slowing of production?
We've gone over the stimulus issue. The government was much too slow to stimulate the economy during the Great Recession and didn't want to repeat that disaster. Was the last COVID stimulus too much? Maybe, but that's only clear in hindsight. Also, every developed nation has struggled with inflation over the last few years and our inflation rate is better than most every other similar nation.
What would Trump have done or not done to consequentially improve inflation when our inflation is already better than most other first-world nations?
caryking said:Civ, you will not agree with this and you will provide data that isn't relevant; however, I'll go...Civilized said:caryking said:Yep…Oldsouljer said:Maybe the better question is, what do interest rates and gas prices have to do with Presidents?caryking said:Please tell us…Civilized said:
What do presidents have to do with interest rates or gas prices?
The answer to the question is simple…. I'm still looking for Civ to comment…
Why are we playing games here?
The President has very little to do with either.
If you think that's wrong, explain what policies Trump or any other President implemented that had significant effect on either.
Biden absolutely has slowed our energy production. You will show things, like leases, etc... that said, production is down in the US, by our domestic drillers.
Biden signed bills into Law that have negatively affected our deficit that turns in debt. Printed money has caused significant inflation; therefore, that's how he has affected things. Now, I don't blame him alone as it took, both Pubs and Dems, to create these bills (except a "BIG" few since he's been office) that he signed into law.
Biden hasn't shown any restraint on signing bills...
Another taste of what things wld be like under a China “led” order vs one primarily influenced/led by the US. https://t.co/2JtPNdBEw2
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) December 21, 2023
hokiewolf said:
Here's a good and very plausible scenario for all you America first folksAnother taste of what things wld be like under a China “led” order vs one primarily influenced/led by the US. https://t.co/2JtPNdBEw2
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) December 21, 2023
We have an emotional relationship, based on our Biblical World View, for Israel. We should support them financially. Israel is perfectly capable of handling themselves militarily.hokiewolf said:
Here's a good and very plausible scenario for all you America first folksAnother taste of what things wld be like under a China “led” order vs one primarily influenced/led by the US. https://t.co/2JtPNdBEw2
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) December 21, 2023
Our relationship with Israel is a lot more strategic than Biblical.caryking said:We have an emotional relationship, based on our Biblical World View, for Israel. We should support them financially. Israel is perfectly capable of handling themselves militarily.hokiewolf said:
Here's a good and very plausible scenario for all you America first folksAnother taste of what things wld be like under a China “led” order vs one primarily influenced/led by the US. https://t.co/2JtPNdBEw2
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) December 21, 2023
Taiwan, on the other hand, we have a vital national interest with them. I'm sure you know what that is…
I actually agree with you here.Civilized said:Our relationship with Israel is a lot more strategic than Biblical.caryking said:We have an emotional relationship, based on our Biblical World View, for Israel. We should support them financially. Israel is perfectly capable of handling themselves militarily.hokiewolf said:
Here's a good and very plausible scenario for all you America first folksAnother taste of what things wld be like under a China “led” order vs one primarily influenced/led by the US. https://t.co/2JtPNdBEw2
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) December 21, 2023
Taiwan, on the other hand, we have a vital national interest with them. I'm sure you know what that is…
Israel is a bastion of democracy and secular rule of law in a region that would otherwise be overrun by Muslim theocracies, Sharia law, and jihadism.
The concept of the US pushing Western ideals into regions that are not receptive does not have a track record of success, but us being allied with and otherwise supporting a self-selecting Western-style democracy that's aligned with the US already in such a region makes all kinds of strategic sense.
Yea… Civ speaking truth this morning!jkpackfan said:I actually agree with you here.Civilized said:Our relationship with Israel is a lot more strategic than Biblical.caryking said:We have an emotional relationship, based on our Biblical World View, for Israel. We should support them financially. Israel is perfectly capable of handling themselves militarily.hokiewolf said:
Here's a good and very plausible scenario for all you America first folksAnother taste of what things wld be like under a China “led” order vs one primarily influenced/led by the US. https://t.co/2JtPNdBEw2
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) December 21, 2023
Taiwan, on the other hand, we have a vital national interest with them. I'm sure you know what that is…
Israel is a bastion of democracy and secular rule of law in a region that would otherwise be overrun by Muslim theocracies, Sharia law, and jihadism.
The concept of the US pushing Western ideals into regions that are not receptive does not have a track record of success, but us being allied with and otherwise supporting a self-selecting Western-style democracy that's aligned with the US already in such a region makes all kinds of strategic sense.
Merry Christmas, Civ!!Civilized said:
Sun even shines on a dog's ass some days.
Merry Christmas, boys.
This has actually been my argument as to why the USA should be backing Israel in their war. They are basically our only ally in the area. For that reason alone, we should be doing what we can to help them. There are many other reasons we should back them, but at the end of the day, its basically the only country in the region that holds similar ideals to usCivilized said:Our relationship with Israel is a lot more strategic than Biblical.caryking said:We have an emotional relationship, based on our Biblical World View, for Israel. We should support them financially. Israel is perfectly capable of handling themselves militarily.hokiewolf said:
Here's a good and very plausible scenario for all you America first folksAnother taste of what things wld be like under a China “led” order vs one primarily influenced/led by the US. https://t.co/2JtPNdBEw2
— Rebeccah Heinrichs (@RLHeinrichs) December 21, 2023
Taiwan, on the other hand, we have a vital national interest with them. I'm sure you know what that is…
Israel is a bastion of democracy and secular rule of law in a region that would otherwise be overrun by Muslim theocracies, Sharia law, and jihadism.
The concept of the US pushing Western ideals into regions that are not receptive does not have a track record of success, but us being allied with and otherwise supporting a self-selecting Western-style democracy that's aligned with the US already in such a region makes all kinds of strategic sense.
Civ is having a good day. Merry Christmas CIv back to ya..........I'm surprised it wasn't happy holidays from your side of the pasture.Civilized said:
Sun even shines on a dog's ass some days.
Merry Christmas, boys.
Werewolf said:Civ is having a good day. Merry Christmas CIv back to ya..........I'm surprised it wasn't happy holidays from your side of the pasture.Civilized said:
Sun even shines on a dog's ass some days.
Merry Christmas, boys.
Be that as it may, we can all be grateful that we are part of the 38% not living paycheck2paycheck that have the means for a little splurge like an IPS subscription.Werewolf said:Civ is having a good day. Merry Christmas CIv back to ya..........I'm surprised it wasn't happy holidays from your side of the pasture.Civilized said:
Sun even shines on a dog's ass some days.
Merry Christmas, boys.
SmaptyWolf said:
Great! Now do we need to go through why it's just as vitally important to our national interests to make sure Ukraine doesn't lose their war, why Putin is most definitely not our friend, and why the U.S. withdrawing from NATO would be extremely bad for our national security? Republicans seem to be confused on this topic lately.
Merry Christmas to you!Civilized said:
Sun even shines on a dog's ass some days.
Merry Christmas, boys.
I think not liking Putin and not supporting Ukraine can both exist…. Now, if we could get a better understanding of how the money is being spent that "might" ease some of the angst.Civilized said:SmaptyWolf said:
Great! Now do we need to go through why it's just as vitally important to our national interests to make sure Ukraine doesn't lose their war, why Putin is most definitely not our friend, and why the U.S. withdrawing from NATO would be extremely bad for our national security? Republicans seem to be confused on this topic lately.
Yep, quite analogous situations.
Both sovereign allied democracies in the midst of, and attacked by, autocratic/terrorist US adversaries.
Both attacks were unprovoked and both Israel and Ukraine are simply looking to protect themselves and exist peaceably with adjacent countries.
Ukraine's situation is more dire than Israel since their military is combating Russia instead of a small splinter "government"/terror group.
This is pretty much where I am. I can't stand Putin and not saying I don't support Ukraine, I just wanna know how our tax dollars are being spent over there. I was the same with Afghanistan and the whole Iraq debacle.caryking said:I think not liking Putin and not supporting Ukraine can both exist…. Now, if we could get a better understanding of how the money is being spent that "might" ease some of the angst.Civilized said:SmaptyWolf said:
Great! Now do we need to go through why it's just as vitally important to our national interests to make sure Ukraine doesn't lose their war, why Putin is most definitely not our friend, and why the U.S. withdrawing from NATO would be extremely bad for our national security? Republicans seem to be confused on this topic lately.
Yep, quite analogous situations.
Both sovereign allied democracies in the midst of, and attacked by, autocratic/terrorist US adversaries.
Both attacks were unprovoked and both Israel and Ukraine are simply looking to protect themselves and exist peaceably with adjacent countries.
Ukraine's situation is more dire than Israel since their military is combating Russia instead of a small splinter "government"/terror group.
Outside of not liking Putin, where is out national interest is supporting Ukraine? For me, it's clear with Taiwan. Ukraine, not so much…
caryking said:I think not liking Putin and not supporting Ukraine can both exist…. Now, if we could get a better understanding of how the money is being spent that "might" ease some of the angst.Civilized said:SmaptyWolf said:
Great! Now do we need to go through why it's just as vitally important to our national interests to make sure Ukraine doesn't lose their war, why Putin is most definitely not our friend, and why the U.S. withdrawing from NATO would be extremely bad for our national security? Republicans seem to be confused on this topic lately.
Yep, quite analogous situations.
Both sovereign allied democracies in the midst of, and attacked by, autocratic/terrorist US adversaries.
Both attacks were unprovoked and both Israel and Ukraine are simply looking to protect themselves and exist peaceably with adjacent countries.
Ukraine's situation is more dire than Israel since their military is combating Russia instead of a small splinter "government"/terror group.
Outside of not liking Putin, where is out national interest is supporting Ukraine? For me, it's clear with Taiwan. Ukraine, not so much…
caryking said:I think not liking Putin and not supporting Ukraine can both exist…. Now, if we could get a better understanding of how the money is being spent that "might" ease some of the angst.Civilized said:SmaptyWolf said:
Great! Now do we need to go through why it's just as vitally important to our national interests to make sure Ukraine doesn't lose their war, why Putin is most definitely not our friend, and why the U.S. withdrawing from NATO would be extremely bad for our national security? Republicans seem to be confused on this topic lately.
Yep, quite analogous situations.
Both sovereign allied democracies in the midst of, and attacked by, autocratic/terrorist US adversaries.
Both attacks were unprovoked and both Israel and Ukraine are simply looking to protect themselves and exist peaceably with adjacent countries.
Ukraine's situation is more dire than Israel since their military is combating Russia instead of a small splinter "government"/terror group.
Outside of not liking Putin, where is out national interest is supporting Ukraine? For me, it's clear with Taiwan. Ukraine, not so much…
Tucker: “You thought Democrats were going to dump Biden for Gavin Newsom, but they're not. They're backing Nikki Haley instead.”
— Myrna 💋💄🍺 (@GigaBeers) January 3, 2024
(She’s one of them! 🦹🏻♂️)
pic.twitter.com/CEq77EIw3Q
WAPO reporter doubles down: You didn’t say that you condemn white supremacy though.
— Chris Carapezza (@Chris_Carapezza) January 3, 2024
She immediately regrets it.@VivekGRamaswamy isn’t going to play the game. pic.twitter.com/2NHshriVZa
packgrad said:
Vivek continues dropping bombs.WAPO reporter doubles down: You didn’t say that you condemn white supremacy though.
— Chris Carapezza (@Chris_Carapezza) January 3, 2024
She immediately regrets it.@VivekGRamaswamy isn’t going to play the game. pic.twitter.com/2NHshriVZa
hokiewolf said:
Yeah, all of his policy stances are pretty terrible but at least he owns the libs! He's earned my vote!
hokiewolf said:
Yeah, all of his policy stances are pretty terrible but at least he owns the libs! He's earned my vote!
Haley seems to be the only grow up on the field.Civilized said:hokiewolf said:
Yeah, all of his policy stances are pretty terrible but at least he owns the libs! He's earned my vote!
Hey Hokie you anticipate voting in the Republican primary?
If so which way are you leaning right now?
hokiewolf said:Haley seems to be the only grow up on the field.Civilized said:hokiewolf said:
Yeah, all of his policy stances are pretty terrible but at least he owns the libs! He's earned my vote!
Hey Hokie you anticipate voting in the Republican primary?
If so which way are you leaning right now?
Yep, Hokie supports the candidate that the Democratic donors want the most. They know Biden can't win, so, they start supporting Haley as she's the most likely candidate that will keep the Neo-Libs and Neo-Cons control on our country…hokiewolf said:Haley seems to be the only grow up on the field.Civilized said:hokiewolf said:
Yeah, all of his policy stances are pretty terrible but at least he owns the libs! He's earned my vote!
Hey Hokie you anticipate voting in the Republican primary?
If so which way are you leaning right now?