New York Times hires openly anti-white racist to Editorial Board (see her tweets)

2,774 Views | 6 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by GuerrillaPack
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Source article. Another article.


Here is the official announcement (from yesterday) by the New York Times of Sarah Jeong joining The Times's Editorial Board.



Examples of her tweets:







wilmwolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She claims she was counter-trolling other trolls. So it's ok to be racist as long as you are racist against racists. What a stupid world we live in.
Just a guy on the sunshine squad.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wilmwolf80 said:

She claims she was counter-trolling other trolls. So it's ok to be racist as long as you are racist against racists. What a stupid world we live in.
Yes, that appears to be the excuse the NYT is officially going with.



But what if the situation was reversed? What if, hypothetically, some prominent company was hiring a white person for such an important job who had made similar derogatory and hateful comments against blacks, hispanics, or asians? Of course, we all know that if that were the case, the Leftist Establishment media would currently have made it a national story and be leading a crusade to have the person fired from their job. The Left leads jihads to fire/destroy people for much less -- such as Christian CEOs or business-owners who oppose homosexuality, etc.

The only logical conclusion we can draw from these blatant double standards is that the Left is a movement that is openly hostile to white people (and Christians and America as a nation, by the way). This is now abundantly clear. Marxist/leftist professors at universities now openly promote the idea that we must "abolish whiteness" (ie, abolish the white race).
NatePait94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ridiculous that they would defend Sarah. Ridiculous.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The lesson here (evidenced from not only this NYT situation but the entire communist/Leftist movement) is that the Left is not a movement that is opposed to "racism" and "discrimination" on principle. Not at all. They openly promote and encourage hatred, racism, and discrimination against whites/Europeans.

A blatant example of this is "affirmative action", which is state-sanctioned discrimination against whites in jobs/hiring, acceptance to colleges, etc. And all over the country, the Marxist-dominated universities are now openly advocating that we should "abolish whiteness", which is a round-about way of admitting that they wish the white race ceased to exist.

The communist Left is a movement that is fundamentally at war with white/European peoples, Christians, and "Western civilization".

The reason for all of this, obviously, is the sacred cow of mass immigration -- because the Left believes that by replacing whites with non-whites via mass immigration, they will be able to take over the Western nations because non-whites predominantly vote for the Leftist/communist/socialist agenda.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tucker covered this:

statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

The lesson here (evidenced from not only this NYT situation but the entire communist/Leftist movement) is that the Left is not a movement that is opposed to "racism" and "discrimination" on principle. Not at all. They openly promote and encourage hatred, racism, and discrimination against whites/Europeans.

A blatant example of this is "affirmative action", which is state-sanctioned discrimination against whites in jobs/hiring, acceptance to colleges, etc. And all over the country, the Marxist-dominated universities are now openly advocating that we should "abolish whiteness", which is a round-about way of admitting that they wish the white race ceased to exist.

The communist Left is a movement that is fundamentally at war with white/European peoples, Christians, and "Western civilization".

The reason for all of this, obviously, is the sacred cow of mass immigration -- because the Left believes that by replacing whites with non-whites via mass immigration, they will be able to take over the Western nations because non-whites predominantly vote for the Leftist/communist/socialist agenda.
Question for you - do you differentiate between a Democrat and a Leftist? If so, how? I'm curious because you seem to be using communist and leftist interchangeably so not sure how 'democrat' fits in.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:


Question for you - do you differentiate between a Democrat and a Leftist? If so, how? I'm curious because you seem to be using communist and leftist interchangeably so not sure how 'democrat' fits in.

Although many people are not aware of this, all "Leftist" movements (the world over) are ideologically based in Marxism. In a nutshell, Marxism is fundamentally a movement with the following aims:

1) Waging war against Christianity and the promotion of a "secular" society (the true purpose of which is to subvert and weaken our society, causing people to become immoral and wicked and unable to resist, and to even accept, the nefarious communist agenda which is designed to enslave and exploit the masses)
2) "Wealth redistribution" to the "oppressed classes" via high taxation (which is actually designed to steal the wealth of and destroy the middle class, and siphon off most of that wealth to the elites that run the communist agenda).
3) Concentration of all power in society in a big central government that controls all aspects of our lives -- including education, press/media and dissemination of information, banking, transportation, land management, etc (the true purpose of this is to be able to enslave the population and keep them indoctrinated/controlled).

The Democratic party is, effectively, the communist party in the United States. Of course they don't openly admit that...for now. But it's obvious that the Democrats push a socialist/Marxist/communist agenda, just by examining the platform and aims of the Democratic party. At this time, the main goals of the Democratic party are tearing down Christian values (eg, fanatical support for abortion, homosexuality, transgender agenda), support for the welfare state and wealth redistribution (eg, Obamacare, Bernie Sanders promising "free" education/etc), opposition to gun rights, promotion of open borders, and now open support for censorship of conservatives.

And, of course, I realize that not all people in the United States who vote for the Democratic party are bad people who are knowingly voting for a communist agenda. Many are just ignorant of the true aims and agenda of the Democratic party.

But it's becoming more and more obvious over the last few years that the Democratic party is socialist/communist -- for example, with Bernie Sanders openly admitting he is a socialist. And now we have Antifa, which is a communist organization, becoming the foot soldiers of the Democratic party on the streets.

All that said, I oppose the Republican party because it is infiltrated and controlled (at the top) by people only pretending to be "conservatives", while actually pushing the communist agenda as well. I support the general platform of the Republican party -- ie, small government, lower taxes, pro gun rights, anti-abortion, control the borders and stop illegal immigration. But the Republican Establishment betrays conservatives on many of these issues -- for example, by not doing enough to stop illegal immigration, and supporting a big powerful government and too much government spending.
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.