UNC Hires Author of 1619 Project

10,150 Views | 91 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by BBW12OG
PackFansXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
National Review link


Quote:

To land a professorship in American colleges and universities, you have to either have a superb record of academic achievement or espouse radical leftist ideas. The former still prevails in hard sciences (although standards there are beginning to erode), but in many other academic fields, "wokeness" is now the main consideration.

Consider, for example, the decision by the journalism school at the University of North Carolina to offer a professorship to Nikole Hannah-Jones. She was the driving force behind the New York Times' 1619 Project, a piece of propaganda that scholars all across the political spectrum have blasted. Nevertheless, Hannah-Jones was awarded a Pulitzer Prize for it. Now UNC wants her.

What's wrong with the 1619 Project? A lot. Schalin writes, "For instance, she claimed that 'one of the primary reasons the colonists decided to declare their independence from Britain was because they wanted to protect the institution of slavery' as British anti-slavery sentiment grew. There is almost no hint of that in factual history." When called out on this false claim, Hannah-Jones has resorted to evasions and personal attacks. What a model for aspiring journalists.

"The real goal of The 1619 Project," Schalin writes, "was not historical or journalistic, but political agitation. And an angry, underhanded politics at that; Hannah-Jones admitted that her underlying intent is to get 'white people to give up whiteness.'"

Does UNC think she will do anything other than promote leftist activism among its journalism students?


Recall that Biden has embraced this mythology and plans to push it on all American children as factual. President Unity is The Manchurian Candidate.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shouldn't surprise anyone. The lefties, even the ones on this board, embrace that 'wokeness." Even the so called
"independents."

They will see come 2022 midterms how stupid their ideologies are.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This demonstrates that the Marxist Left aim, ultimately, to destroy the United States as a nation. That's why they are attacking the very founding of the nation, as this woman is doing, as having a "racist", pro-slavery motivation. The Left has already been vilifying the Founding Fathers for many years. And this has now escalated to tearing down statues of Thomas Jefferson, and probably not long until they are doing the same to George Washington.

The ultimate target for destruction is the Bill of Rights and our form of government under the Constitution. This is what defines America - our rights and freedoms. The Marxist Left are totalitarians, who want to destroy these freedoms, in order to bring in, ultimately, a worldwide tyrannical system (ie, the "New World Order" agenda).

This is clear now with, for example, the open war by the Left against the 1st and 2nd Amendments, gun rights and freedom of speech. Also, look at how the Left wants to abolish the electoral college. They want to shread the Constitution. This is the radical "change" to America they are now always talking about.

And if it was up to the more radical on the Left , we would also completely abolish our borders, and have free-flowing unlimited immigration from Mexico and South America. We already almost have this anyway, with very ineffective enforcement of laws against illegal immigration. The future goal is to merge the United States into a "North American Union" with Mexico and Canada - where borders are virtually done away with (in many respects), as in the European Union. This will be an incremental step towards a one-world government system.
"Ye are not of the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you." - John 15:19
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Critical Race Theory may be the worst thing to come out of academia in a while and that's saying a lot. Basically, In order to stop racism and be anti racist, you have to introduce new racism to a different race. Crazy.

Race is a lie perpetrated to justify some sort of action against humans who look a little different.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
ciscopack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The people at Plymouth Rock came because of religion; had my cousin been Captain of that ship (the Mayflower), he'd taken them where they wanted to go......New York....down the Hudson. The people at Jamestown/Williamsburg came to make money.

My cousin did Captain many ships (inc. the Mayflower) to the New World before the Spanish killed him. He was the first to bring many products to the New World; many, many product....all kinds of plants, foods and drink and animals; he also brought slaves. He set one that I know of free and he was a black land owner, registered to vote citizen and Patriot in the Plymouth Rock area.

http://family.castedo.com/webtrees/individual.php?pid=I68&ged=Sargent

https://winthropmemorials.org/great-allotment/pages/william-pierce.html


"The captain of the Mayflower (on its first voyage), named Jones, had agreed to take them (the Pilgrims) only across the Atlantic. He is said to have been bribed by Virginian and Dutch colonists not to bring the Pilgrims to Virginia or New Amsterdam. Capt. William Pierce would have landed them where they wished, and if he had commanded the Mayflower on that voyage New England might have been settled in Virginia or New York. The Pilgrims had planned to go to the Hudson river."

"Although it was not until her second voyage that he was captain of the famed Mayflower, Capt. William had more than his share of "firsts". He brought the first cattle to New England from England (ship Charity, 1624). He brought from the West Indies to New England the first cotton (1633) and the first sweet potatoes (ship Desire in 1636). He published the first bound book in English to be printed in North America - Pierce's (Peirse's) Almanac of 1639 calculated for New England and printed by Stephen Day, "an exceedingly illiterate printer," on a press brought to Boston in 1638 by the Rev. Mr. Glover, English clergyman."

"Although the first Thanksgiving Day is commonly considered to have been the celebration following the first Pilgrim harvest in 1621, it has been suggested that Captain William Pierce was instrumental in bringing about the first real Thanksgiving observance ten years later!"

"The winter of 1630-31 was severe, game was scarce, the corn supply was nearly gone, even acorns and ground nuts were concealed by heavy snows. Women of the Colony were set to digging clams; a ration of five kernels of corn a day for each person was ordered. The Colonists were on the verge of starvation and had designated Feb. 22, 1631, as a fast day of prayer."

"Governor Winthrop, anticipating a hard winter, had sent Captain Pierce to England for provisions in the ship Lyon the previous fall. Pierce was delayed when he came upon the ship Ambrose, dismasted, and towed her home to Bristol. The Colonists had about given up hope of his return when the Lyon was spied, in the words of Cotton Mather, "just as Winthrop was distributing the last handful of meal in the barrel."

"The Lyon was loaded with beef and pork, wheat, peas, oatmeal, cheese, butter, suet and lemon juice. The scheduled fast day was joyfully turned into a Thanksgiving day. Mary Lowe in Thanksgiving, edited by Robert H. Schauffer, calls this "the first Thanksgiving day of which any written record remains in the Colonial records of Massachusetts" and adds, "We may justly claim this as the origin of Thanksgiving day." Lincoln writes: "This appears to have been the origin of Thanksgiving day." W. deLoss Love, Jr., in Fast and Thanksgiving Days of New England, calls the 1621 celebration "a harvest festival....not a Thanksgiving at all....not a day set aside for religious worship, but a whole week of festivity." Mary Lowe agrees, stating many deny the 1621 celebration was the first Thanksgiving day and pointed out the lack of any religious service during this week of feasting."

"Described as the most celebrated master of ships to come into the water of New England during the Colonists' early history, Captain William was an intimate and confidant of both Gov. William Bradford and Edward Winslow, a founder of the Colony, thrice governor and later commissioner of the United Colonies of New England."

"According to Lincoln, Captain William was master of the Mayflower on nine different voyages. He certainly was captain was these ships: Paragon, 1622, (owned by brother John); Anne, 1623, third ship to arrive from England; Charity, 1624, carrying Winslow and the first cattle from England; Jacob, 1625; Mayflower, 1629: Lyon, 1630, with Roger Williams and wife; Lyon, 1631, with John Elliot and Governor Winthrop's wife; Lyon, 1632, with Winthrop; Rebecca, 1634; Narragansett, 1634."

"He was in the West Indies in 1635 and the same year rescued refugees from the Connecticut Valley. He sailed to Block Island in the Desire in 1636 and the next year took supplies from Boston to soldiers fighting in the Pequot war. He sailed the Desire from London to Boston in 1638 and the next year sailed her back to London in a record 23 days. In 1641 in the same ship he commanded an expedition carrying dissenters to the West Indies. The Spaniards were hostile and he turned back, stopped at New Providence, an island in the Bahamas, to bring away a congregation there."

"Says Colonel Pierce in his Pierce Genealogy: "Though finding the Spaniards already in possession he stood gallantly in, hoping to rescue his countrymen. When the enemy opened upon him with cannon, he sent his people into the hold for safety, retaining on deck but one man to aid in working the ship. While lying in the caboose watching the sails, the captain and this sailor were fatally wounded by the same shot (July 13, 1641). The Desire headed for home, her noble master finding a fitting grave in the blue sea upon which so much of his life had been spent. His death was much lamented in the two colonies, which had so long known him as a skilful navigator and a Christian gentleman.""

"One of the "two colones" referred to certainly was Massachusetts, and the other may be Virginia. Lincoln states that Pierce lived briefly (1623-4) at James City, Va., with his wife Jane and 34 servants and that he served as Burgess from James City to the Virginia general assembly, later moving to Boston. Colonel Pierce, however, gives as William's addresses only Bristol, England, Boston, and Providence in the Bahamas."

ncsualum05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

This demonstrates that the Marxist Left aim, ultimately, to destroy the United States as a nation. That's why they are attacking the very founding of the nation, as this woman is doing, as having a "racist", pro-slavery motivation. The Left has already been vilifying the Founding Fathers for many years. And this has now escalated to tearing down statues of Thomas Jefferson, and probably not long until they are doing the same to George Washington.

The ultimate target for destruction is the Bill of Rights and our form of government under the Constitution. This is what defines America - our rights and freedoms. The Marxist Left are totalitarians, who want to destroy these freedoms, in order to bring in, ultimately, a worldwide tyrannical system (ie, the "New World Order" agenda).

This is clear now with, for example, the open war by the Left against the 1st and 2nd Amendments, gun rights and freedom of speech. Also, look at how the Left wants to abolish the electoral college. They want to shread the Constitution. This is the radical "change" to America they are now always talking about.

And if it was up to the more radical on the Left , we would also completely abolish our borders, and have free-flowing unlimited immigration from Mexico and South America. We already almost have this anyway, with very ineffective enforcement of laws against illegal immigration. The future goal is to merge the United States into a "North American Union" with Mexico and Canada - where borders are virtually done away with (in many respects), as in the European Union. This will be an incremental step towards a one-world government system.
Boy they sure have. 20 years ago this post would've looked insane. Hell 10 years ago. But now it's happening in front of us. Conservatives are the last line before the total collapse of America. But the left dominates news, big tech, big corp America, wall street, entertainment, education, and culture. So it's hard to say how much longer there is a legitimate resistance to all of this.

To add to what you said about border and bill of rights last year GOP campaigned on warning voters about DC statehood, abolishing filibuster, and packing the supreme court as policies the left would try in order to cement a power grab of one party rule. I'm sure many people scoffed at that as campaign rhetoric but here they are trying it. Hopefully the backlash in 2022 is massive and neuters the left in the short term.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I fully expect (hope) that the we flip at least 30 seats in the House. It seems very very possible that the swing will be that big.

The Senate will be back in McConnell's control. Possibly with 3 seat advantage which will be good to offset Collins and Romney.

2024 pick ups will be GOP favored. Win the White House and destroy every liberal fantasy possible. Gerrymander the hell out of every state possible.

You lefties want to expand the SCOTUS...... let's see what happens when we have power if you still want to do that.

Go scorched Earth on their leftist asses and take no prisoners approach. They want to destroy American let's destroy their left wing nut job of a party.
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know you're going to call me a leftist, socialist, etc but aren't you advocating for the right to do exactly what you hate about what the left is doing now? Just asking for clarification. Hoping you can just sum it up in one or two words. Thanks.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

I know you're going to call me a leftist, socialist, etc but aren't you advocating for the right to do exactly what you hate about what the left is doing now? Just asking for clarification. Hoping you can just sum it up in one or two words. Thanks.
Good for the goose. Is that simple enough for you?
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm actually impressed that's all you typed out honestly. I don't subscribe to the good for the goose line but to each their own.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

I'm actually impressed that's all you typed out honestly. I don't subscribe to the good for the goose line but to each their own.
You don't think your party is not going to try this again if they ever get the votes needed?

Manchin and maybe Sinema are the only thing keeping this country from single party rule. They will dismantle every Constitutional Right they doesn't align with their leftist ideologies.

They want this country to be a SOCIALIST Regime with one party rule.

To each their own is a great way of looking at it. One party is for freedom and democracy. The other isn't.

So yeah... to each their own.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

RunsWithWolves26 said:

I'm actually impressed that's all you typed out honestly. I don't subscribe to the good for the goose line but to each their own.
You don't think your party is not going to try this again if they ever get the votes needed?

Manchin and maybe Sinema are the only thing keeping this country from single party rule. They will dismantle every Constitutional Right they doesn't align with their leftist ideologies.

They want this country to be a SOCIALIST Regime with one party rule.

To each their own is a great way of looking at it. One party is for freedom and democracy. The other isn't.

So yeah... to each their own.
Curious that you fearmonger one party rule and also opine for one party rule in the same post based on whether you agree or not with the ideology. Maybe there should be two parties working together rather than this political Tribalism BS
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sorry to disappoint but I don't have a party. I actually look at things from both sides and see them for what they are. I understand that may be hard for someone like you on the far right or someone on the far left to understand. People like you on the far right and others on the far left are the problem. It's the reason NOTHING gets done at any point, ever.
ncsualum05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

I know you're going to call me a leftist, socialist, etc but aren't you advocating for the right to do exactly what you hate about what the left is doing now? Just asking for clarification. Hoping you can just sum it up in one or two words. Thanks.
I understand you and BBW have a rather interesting continual banter.

I am currently advocating for the power to shift back to the right in a big way not to try to cement 1 party rule but in order to prevent a permanent change to this country for the worse. The democrats have a clear agenda it's not like it's hidden or secret. They would absolutely love one party rule and change the rules or constitution anyway they could to make it happen. Maybe there are republicans that would want that power as well but from what I've seen republicans are not willing to go to the same lengths of destruction in institutions that democrats are to gain it.

My basic philosophy is that government is worse and more corrupt the bigger it is. I am for smaller government in general. So I can never vote democrat or left....ever, based on that alone. Ideally I'd rather there be 2 viable parties that when they aren't trying to win an election over each other could actually work together. 2 parties that actually loved the country but just had differing ideas on how to best serve it.

However, we are SOOOOO freaking far away from that now. There are a few exceptions but the democrat party by and large now represent a hatred for America and it's traditions.

Republicans have corruption, abuse of power, and the like there's no doubt about it. I by and large detest most politicians on both sides. But they're more likely to stay out of your life and keep the system in place that you've known your whole life. Democrats are not only corrupt but they are motivated by radical ideology and would not only try to interfere in your life but also seem to be closer and closer to wanting to blow up the entire country.

With republicans you can get upset about redistricting or using the rules in place to vote on a supreme court pick when you don't like it.

With democrats you have much worse things to worry about.

I hope this better explains where I'm coming from.
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I totally agree with you. I feel the far left is certainly trying to change things for selfish reasons. At the same time, I don't want to see the far right take over and try to do stuff just as far right as the far left is trying to do now. My issue is, that some on this board, want everything they want and don't give a damn about anyone else. The only way things work is with give and take. It ain't right for the far left or the far right to control the other 75%.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You sound a lot like me where you lean towards libertarianism a little? If there's a good libertarian candidate on the ballot than I tend to vote for them over the republican candidate. But they seem few and far between.
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here we go.......

All of you so called "libertarians" are nothing but ashamed to admit it democrats. Just own it.
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Again, sorry to disappoint but you've assumed again that you know what party I'm associated with. I am an independent. I vote split party every single election. Thank you yet again for your assumptions.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

Again, sorry to disappoint but you've assumed again that you know what party I'm associated with. I am an independent. I vote split party every single election. Thank you yet again for your assumptions.
ncsualum05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

I totally agree with you. I feel the far left is certainly trying to change things for selfish reasons. At the same time, I don't want to see the far right take over and try to do stuff just as far right as the far left is trying to do now. My issue is, that some on this board, want everything they want and don't give a damn about anyone else. The only way things work is with give and take. It ain't right for the far left or the far right to control the other 75%.
Yes. It's very important to remember though that there is a difference in the parties. Do not fall into the trap of equivalence.



RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ncsualum05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hokiewolf said:

You sound a lot like me where you lean towards libertarianism a little? If there's a good libertarian candidate on the ballot than I tend to vote for them over the republican candidate. But they seem few and far between.
In some respects I suppose I would but I don't consider myself a libertarian. I would never vote 3rd party b/c it's simply not viable but on top of that no candidate has ever impressed me. I am on the right... I try to view things clearly but I do have a bias.

My most simple goals for voting in this tumultuous time is for a candidate that will protect the bill of rights, make sure our elections are more secure, and basically keep America America. GOP is the best chance to doing that and it's absolutely not ideal.
PackFansXL
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RWW, I am curious about what you fear the most from the "far right".
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Getting into a woman's reproductive rights, gay Marriage for a couple. Just as I hate the far left wanting to raise taxes on businesses who provide jobs or try to shut people up for their religious views.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

Getting into a woman's reproductive rights, gay Marriage for a couple. Just as I hate the far left wanting to raise taxes on businesses who provide jobs or try to shut people up for their religious views.
LOL...just say you are PRO ABORTION..... yeah.... real libertarian...
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I actually don't have an opinion on it. I just feel it's not the governments right to dictate what a person does with their body.
packgrad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Your two sentences are in conflict. You say one thing in one sentence and then the very next sentence you contradict yourself.
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
packgrad said:

Your two sentences are in conflict. You say one thing in one sentence and then the very next sentence you contradict yourself.
Glad to see I'm not the only one that see that with RWW. He's done it for weeks then he will disappear when called out on it.

Guess we won't hear from him for a few weeks now.

Quote:

I actually don't have an opinion on it. I just feel it's not the governments right to dictate what a person does with their body.
So which is it? You either "don't have an opinion" or "(you) I feel it's not the governments right." You see the dichotomy?

As your leader Sleepy Joe would say..."come on man..."

You have to give it to the lefties. If they weren't talking out of both sides of their mouths they aren't talking.

I know the GOP has hypocrites in the party but wow....those lefties take it to a whole other level. And do it without so much a a care or concern with what they had just said 10 minutes ago.

See above comments! Zero self awareness. Trademark of their party.
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The government should stay out of peoples business as to who they love and what they do with their bodies. At the same time, the government should stay out of trying to tax the wealthy just because they are wealthy or telling religious groups they should or.ahoukdnt do something. That's how I feel.
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You do you boo boo
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

You do you boo boo
LOL.... yeah.... calling you out for your contradictory statements is "me being me..."

Congrats on yet another self own. You are putting together quite the resume' on those!

Civilized
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

Sorry to disappoint but I don't have a party. I actually look at things from both sides and see them for what they are. I understand that may be hard for someone like you on the far right or someone on the far left to understand. People like you on the far right and others on the far left are the problem. It's the reason NOTHING gets done at any point, ever.

Whatever dude.

People that don't align core conservative are one of three things, lefty Biden ****-gaggers, closet lefty COMMUNISTS, or "not a Democrats."

Which one are you, Runs?
BBW12OG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Civilized said:

RunsWithWolves26 said:

Sorry to disappoint but I don't have a party. I actually look at things from both sides and see them for what they are. I understand that may be hard for someone like you on the far right or someone on the far left to understand. People like you on the far right and others on the far left are the problem. It's the reason NOTHING gets done at any point, ever.

Whatever dude.

People that don't align core conservative are one of three things, lefty Biden ****-gaggers, closet lefty COMMUNISTS, or "not a Democrats."

Which one are you, Runs?
Well at least you have come to terms with your station in life. Good for you! Now get the rest of your comrades to do the same and we can have insightful discussions on why you and your brethren want to dismantle our Republic.
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
There's no nuances allowed in arguments according to some here. You can not have a personal opinion on abortion but also believe it isn't the governments right to dictate policy on what you can or can't do in your personal life. There's no contradiction there
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
hokiewolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BBW12OG said:

Civilized said:

RunsWithWolves26 said:

Sorry to disappoint but I don't have a party. I actually look at things from both sides and see them for what they are. I understand that may be hard for someone like you on the far right or someone on the far left to understand. People like you on the far right and others on the far left are the problem. It's the reason NOTHING gets done at any point, ever.

Whatever dude.

People that don't align core conservative are one of three things, lefty Biden ****-gaggers, closet lefty COMMUNISTS, or "not a Democrats."

Which one are you, Runs?
Well at least you have come to terms with your station in life. Good for you! Now get the rest of your comrades to do the same and we can have insightful discussions on why you and your brethren want to dismantle our Republic.
But only in the next 1 year and 8 months!
Originator of the Tony Adams Scale
Last Page
Page 1 of 3
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.