AOC supporter offers brilliant solution to the climate change crisis

5,609 Views | 24 Replies | Last: 4 yr ago by GuerrillaPack
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guys, AOC was wrong. We don't have 12 years before climate change causes the world to end. We only have months, as pointed out by this citizen. It's time for more drastic measures. Or we are all going to die. This is really freaking serious, and it's time we started acting like it.

What is the ultimate cause of climate change? Human beings. We can't allow CO2 emissions to cause sea levels to rise a few inches, causing millions of people to drown. So how do we save the lives of millions of people? We need to kill millions of people. Sorry. Human population is the problem.

And abortion is not enough. It's just not creating the reduction in human population that they...errr, I mean we... need. So what do we do? This concerned citizen has proposed that we need to eat children. That may sound "radical", but it's really not, when you stop to think about it. As you have already noticed, heroic Democrats like the governor of Virginia and many others are already championing post-birth abortions. And another food source will help alleviate the global hunger crisis.

We absolutely must do something to stop this mythical global warming, that is not really occurring. The climate is always changing. So we must stop it from changing. Or else it is going to lead to the apocalypse and kill all of us - somehow.

Give thanks to god Satan that we have communists like AOC and the Democrats who are constantly looking out for us, and never stop thinking of ways to bring us a utopia and save as many human lives as possible.

RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Between you on the far right and the far left on the impeachment thread, this country is absolutely ****ed. The rest of us in the middle just sit back and wait for it to end because we don't matter to any of you people's politicians.
ncsupack1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watched it and sure if the girl was serious or not? But what is troubling is that AOC didn't put the idea down?...but in all seriousness I worry for the country.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:

Between you on the far right and the far left on the impeachment thread, this country is absolutely ****ed. The rest of us in the middle just sit back and wait for it to end because we don't matter to any of you people's politicians.
What is the "far right" promoting that is harmful to the country? Honest question. Not trying to be contentious.

And if you reference the warmongering in the Mid East, promoted by the Zionist/neocon faction of Republicans, I am 100% against all of these wars. And most conservative people (at the grassroots level) are also against these wars. Trump campaigned against the wars. Then he did a 180 degree turn, as on many other issues -- showing that he is another Establishment puppet. Both parties support the war-mongering.

I'm also against the tyrannical police state that has been built, on the pretext of the 9/11 false flag and the phony "war on terror".
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

RunsWithWolves26 said:

Between you on the far right and the far left on the impeachment thread, this country is absolutely ****ed. The rest of us in the middle just sit back and wait for it to end because we don't matter to any of you people's politicians.
What is the "far right" promoting that is harmful to the country? Honest question. Not trying to be contentious.

And if you reference the warmongering in the Mid East, promoted by the Zionist/neocon faction of Republicans, I am 100% against all of these wars. And most conservative people (at the grassroots level) are also against these wars. Trump campaigned against the wars. Then he did a 180 degree turn, as on many other issues -- showing that he is another Establishment puppet. Both parties support the war-mongering.

I'm also against the tyrannical police state that has been built, on the pretext of the 9/11 false flag and the phony "war on terror".


The far right(you and others like you) and the far left as has been crystal damn clear in the impeachment thread are the issues. You love to scream about how terrible the far left is. Just as others here love to scream about how terrible the far right is. If you aren't intelligent enough to see that the issue is the far left and far right, then maybe that explains the nonstop 12 page post that you continue to put out and all the references to these "theories, conspiracies, etc that you talk about. It's so damn clear that the problem with this country is the radicals on both sides yet neither side of those radicals is smart enough or cares enough to admit it and change it.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RunsWithWolves26 said:




The far right(you and others like you) and the far left as has been crystal damn clear in the impeachment thread are the issues. You love to scream about how terrible the far left is. Just as others here love to scream about how terrible the far right is. If you aren't intelligent enough to see that the issue is the far left and far right, then maybe that explains the nonstop 12 page post that you continue to put out and all the references to these "theories, conspiracies, etc that you talk about. It's so damn clear that the problem with this country is the radicals on both sides yet neither side of those radicals is smart enough or cares enough to admit it and change it.
I only posted one time in the impeachment thread. I pointed out that Trump is a puppet, and part of the Establishment. Both parties work together to implement the same globalist/NWO/communist agenda. The supposed "fighting" between them is like WWE wrestling. Scripted theatre. That's what this impeachment is. Just a "show" to distract the masses, giving the illusion of a "fight", and a "difference" between the parties. There is no substantive difference between the parties, mainly because the Republicans are FAKE "conservatives". The Democrats are socialists/communists, and the Republicans are "Democrats lite".

It's no "virtue" to be a compromiser, or in the middle. The Messiah was a "radical". He upset the Establishment of his day (ie, the Pharisees) so much that they murdered him for what he taught. And he said something about being lukewarm. One side is right, and the other is wrong. It's like that on most issues. For example, do you think God is sitting up in heaven saying to himself, "they should compromise and be in the middle on abortion"?? No. God is 100% against ALL abortion. He has a similar uncompromising view on issues like homosexuality, sexual promiscuity, witchcraft and the occult, etc.
RunsWithWolves26
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

RunsWithWolves26 said:




The far right(you and others like you) and the far left as has been crystal damn clear in the impeachment thread are the issues. You love to scream about how terrible the far left is. Just as others here love to scream about how terrible the far right is. If you aren't intelligent enough to see that the issue is the far left and far right, then maybe that explains the nonstop 12 page post that you continue to put out and all the references to these "theories, conspiracies, etc that you talk about. It's so damn clear that the problem with this country is the radicals on both sides yet neither side of those radicals is smart enough or cares enough to admit it and change it.
I only posted one time in the impeachment thread. I pointed out that Trump is a puppet, and part of the Establishment. Both parties work together to implement the same globalist/NWO/communist agenda. The supposed "fighting" between them is like WWE wrestling. Scripted theatre. That's what this impeachment is. Just a "show" to distract the masses, giving the illusion of a "fight", and a "difference" between the parties. There is no substantive difference between the parties, mainly because the Republicans are FAKE "conservatives". The Democrats are socialists/communists, and the Republicans are "Democrats lite".

It's no "virtue" to be a compromiser, or in the middle. The Messiah was a "radical". He upset the Establishment of his day (ie, the Pharisees) so much that they murdered him for what he taught. And he said something about being lukewarm. One side is right, and the other is wrong. It's like that on most issues. For example, do you think God is sitting up in heaven saying to himself, "they should compromise and be in the middle on abortion"?? No. God is 100% against ALL abortion. He has a similar uncompromising view on issues like homosexuality, sexual promiscuity, witchcraft and the occult, etc.


Good grief. I have to quit with you. Keep doing you and keep contributing to the problem that you claim the other side is so responsible for. Have a great week. No more responses to anymore of your long, drawn out, bible this, radical that, conspiracy bull*****
Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wish OTF was still alive so he could eat you up.

In him own words "God almighty"

(Notice capitalized God)
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This can stay open even tho AOC basically ignored a obvious plant but be careful where this goes
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glasswolf said:

This can stay open even tho AOC basically ignored a obvious plant but be careful where this goes
Be careful of what exactly? I thought the only rules on these forums were 1) keep on topic, and 2) no personal attacks against other users. And obviously don't post something like pornography.

Beyond that, what else is forbidden?
statefan91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The group that planted her has already come out and admitted as such
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
statefan91 said:

The group that planted her has already come out and admitted as such
Well what do you propose we do? How else are we going to stop the coming climate change cataclysm that is going to kill us all and end the world? The sea level is going to rise 0.25 of an inch and drown all of us -- under a 0.25 inch tsunami that will cover the highest mountains in the world from the polar ice caps melting. A true extinction-level event.

AOC and our other benevolent communist overlords are only calling us to ban cars and stop using fossil fuels. And for us to be taxed into oblivion and pay carbon taxes to the United Nations. That does not go far enough. We only have a few months before the world ends.

I propose we put a tax on breathing air. And a tax on drinking water. A "life tax" -- a tax for the privilege of our communist/NWO overlords just allowing us to live on this earth that they claim to rule. In addition to the brave solution of eating babies, of course.

Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

statefan91 said:

The group that planted her has already come out and admitted as such
Well what do you propose we do? How else are we going to stop the coming climate change cataclysm that is going to kill us all and end the world? The sea level is going to rise 0.25 of an inch and drown all of us -- under a 0.25 inch tsunami that will cover the highest mountains in the world from the polar ice caps melting. A true extinction-level event.

AOC and our other benevolent communist overlords are only calling us to ban cars and stop using fossil fuels. And for us to be taxed into oblivion and pay carbon taxes to the United Nations. That does not go far enough. We only have a few months before the world ends.

I propose we put a tax on breathing air. And a tax on drinking water. A "life tax" -- a tax for the privilege of our communist/NWO overlords just allowing us to live on this earth that they claim to rule. In addition to the brave solution of eating babies, of course.


Climate change is real. Is it going to affect us or kill us in 12 years? No. But long after you and me are gone it will affect some in your/my family. It's not about our generation or the next. It's about leaving a better world for people after we are long gone.

Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Glasswolf said:

This can stay open even tho AOC basically ignored a obvious plant but be careful where this goes
Be careful of what exactly? I thought the only rules on these forums were 1) keep on topic, and 2) no personal attacks against other users. And obviously don't post something like pornography.

Beyond that, what else is forbidden?
Stop posting stupid unproven stuff. And posting stupid unproven stuff to back up your stupid unproven stuff.
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glasswolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

Glasswolf said:

This can stay open even tho AOC basically ignored a obvious plant but be careful where this goes
Be careful of what exactly? I thought the only rules on these forums were 1) keep on topic, and 2) no personal attacks against other users. And obviously don't post something like pornography.

Beyond that, what else is forbidden?
Stop posting stupid unproven stuff. And posting stupid unproven stuff to back up your stupid unproven stuff.
Are you saying that you are going to censor people who happen to post what you (personally) find to be views or opinions that are "untrue" or "unproven"?

Every single person here will have different opinions about what is "true" or "proven" on almost every subject imaginable. So no matter WHAT subject is up for discussion, you are going to have people taking every side of that issue. And then, hypothetically, you will have to censor those who do not adhere to the "orthodox" view on that subject.

If the end goal is for everyone to learn and to come to the knowledge of things that are "true", the way to achieve that is to have MORE freedom of speech. And to allow debate, and discussion, and disagreements. Not to have a thought police enforcing an orthodoxy.

And if what I'm saying is "false", then what is there to fear from allowing me to have such a viewpoint? Are you saying that I'm so very persuasive, that I am a "danger" to be able to convert other people to my "false" ideology?

Those who actually have the factually correct and "right" views have nothing to fear from an open debate, and from disagreement and discussion. If someone has the facts and logic on their side, then they are willing and eager to allow a free and open debate -- so that those facts and logic can come to light.

The only reason to want to censor an ideological opponent is because a person does not have the facts and logic on their side -- and they want to prevent an open debate when those facts, logic, and arguments can be made.

Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are a conspiracy theorist. Any Democrat is a satanist, new world order baby killer who hates God and the Bible.

Again for the record, My father in law is a retired SOUTHERN BAPTIST Minister for over 47 years. He's a registered Democrat and has voted that way. His Associate Pastor who is the Head of Operation In as Much is a registered Democrat who has voted that way. They both have devoted their lives to preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ and His teachings.

I am a born again Christian of over 43 years. I was raised Pentecostal and still believe that way.

So here is just 3 people that disprove what you seem to be saying.

I'm done with this thread and you.
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glasswolf said:

You are a conspiracy theorist. Any Democrat is a satanist, new world order baby killer who hates God and the Bible.

Again for the record, My father in law is a retired SOUTHERN BAPTIST Minister for over 47 years. He's a registered Democrat and has voted that way. His Associate Pastor who is the Head of Operation In as Much is a registered Democrat who has voted that way. They both have devoted their lives to preaching the Gospel of Jesus Christ and His teachings.

I am a born again Christian of over 43 years. I was raised Pentecostal and still believe that way.

So here is just 3 people that disprove what you seem to be saying.

I'm done with this thread and you.
I have NEVER said that "every" person voting Democrat is "evil". Never once said anything like that.

What I've said is that the leadership at the highest levels of Leftist movements have malevolent intent.
GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cannibalism to fight climate change? Not as crazy as first thought.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html

Quote:

Swedish scientist says humans should become cannibals to fight climate change because eating human flesh is more 'sustainable' than the meat industry

A solution to tackling climate change is to eat human flesh from dead bodies, a Swedish scientist has claimed.

Professor Magnus Soderlund, of Stockholm School of Economics, believes practicing cannibalism might save the planet if society were to 'awaken to the idea'.

Speaking on Swedish television, he suggested dead bodies would be more sustainable than the meat and dairy industry - or even eating insects - if food sources become scarce in the future

Not so nutty anymore, right? Because a "professor" and "scientist" in his ivory tower of academia said it. Now it has "legitimacy", doesn't it? This might just be a good idea, now! Whenever a so-called "scientist" advocates an idea, or when a "major news reporter" claims something on television in their fancy suit....the supposed and perceived "prestige" of their position automatically gives "legitimacy" to their views.

Behind every parody is an element of truth.
IseWolf22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GuerrillaPack said:

Glasswolf said:

GuerrillaPack said:

Glasswolf said:

This can stay open even tho AOC basically ignored a obvious plant but be careful where this goes
Be careful of what exactly? I thought the only rules on these forums were 1) keep on topic, and 2) no personal attacks against other users. And obviously don't post something like pornography.

Beyond that, what else is forbidden?
Stop posting stupid unproven stuff. And posting stupid unproven stuff to back up your stupid unproven stuff.
Are you saying that you are going to censor people who happen to post what you (personally) find to be views or opinions that are "untrue" or "unproven"?

Every single person here will have different opinions about what is "true" or "proven" on almost every subject imaginable. So no matter WHAT subject is up for discussion, you are going to have people taking every side of that issue. And then, hypothetically, you will have to censor those who do not adhere to the "orthodox" view on that subject.

If the end goal is for everyone to learn and to come to the knowledge of things that are "true", the way to achieve that is to have MORE freedom of speech. And to allow debate, and discussion, and disagreements. Not to have a thought police enforcing an orthodoxy.

And if what I'm saying is "false", then what is there to fear from allowing me to have such a viewpoint? Are you saying that I'm so very persuasive, that I am a "danger" to be able to convert other people to my "false" ideology?

Those who actually have the factually correct and "right" views have nothing to fear from an open debate, and from disagreement and discussion. If someone has the facts and logic on their side, then they are willing and eager to allow a free and open debate -- so that those facts and logic can come to light.

The only reason to want to censor an ideological opponent is because a person does not have the facts and logic on their side -- and they want to prevent an open debate when those facts, logic, and arguments can be made.




This may be the only thing you've posted that I agree with
Francis
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glass, do you just dislike anyone who disagrees with you or is not a democrat?
Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No. That's what makes this country great but this nut job rivals Donald Trump with his conspiracy theories
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And I've not locked anything on this board in a long, long time
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

griff17matt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glasswolf said:

No. That's what makes this country great but this nut job rivals Donald Trump with his conspiracy theories

It's the anti-semitism that gets me. Just blatant with it. Conspiracy theory it up all you want, but I lose you when you go full racist idiot.
Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Francis said:

Glass, do you just dislike anyone who disagrees with you or is not a democrat?
You've not read a thing I've posted have you? I have stated many times that, yes I'm a registered democrat but I've actually voted GOP as many times as I have democrat. Not sure if any of of you GOP voters will ever admit the same
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

Glasswolf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://news.yahoo.com/interruption-aoc-town-hall-revealed-185953942.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca
Payton Wilson on what he thought of Carter Finley: Drunk Crazy Crowded

GuerrillaPack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Glasswolf said:

https://news.yahoo.com/interruption-aoc-town-hall-revealed-185953942.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca
Yes, the woman was obviously trolling AOC and her supporters.

But it's based on a real/genuine argument made by a climate change agenda proponent who is a professor and scientist, who seriously argues that we should resort to cannibalism to "fight climate change".

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7443707/Swedish-scientist-says-humans-cannibals-fight-climate-change.html
Refresh
Page 1 of 1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.